• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources suggest that Kornilov main aim in august 1917 was to crush the Bolsheviks?

Extracts from this document...


Book 8 page 30 A How far do the sources suggest that Kornilov main aim in august 1917 was to crush the Bolsheviks? Source 1 tells us that Kornilov states that he believes that the provisional government, under large pressure from the Bolsheviks is cooperating with the German high command to take Russia out of the war early. He believes that Russia is dying and becoming disheartened at the expected landing of enemy troops on Russian soil. He states that all he wants is for a Constitutional assembly to determine the fate of Russia. However when you compare this to source 3 which was written by a member of the provisional government, he states that Kerensky feared that Kornilov wanted only to become a Russian dictator. ...read more.


Source 2 goes on to defend the July days incident in which the Bolsheviks attempted a coup, and simply says it is yet to be proven that it was not just a simply demonstration. If you compare source 2 to source 1 you will see the conflicting impressions of both the Bolsheviks and Kornilov. Source 1 talk about the Bolsheviks as on the German payroll and attempting to undermine the government, while source 2 talks about the Bolsheviks and how they are treated unfairly by Kornilov and the provisional government. On the other hand source 2 talks about Kornilov as a liar and worth of treason against Russia it also goes on to state that he attempted to blame his coup on the Bolsheviks. ...read more.


The source goes on to tell us that when Kornilov marched on Petrograd with the intention of a coup Kerensky panicked and shouted for someone to help him. If you compare this source with the other two you will realise that this spends more time criticising Kornilov and Kerensky then the Bolsheviks. In conclusion I think that source 1 mainly criticises the Bolsheviks because it was written by Kornilov himself who wanted to blame his coup on the Bolsheviks. Source 2 is written by Lenin and so defends the Bolsheviks and describes the July days as a peaceful demonstration. Source 3 mainly talks about Kornilov and Kerensky's attempts at power because this was written by a Duma member it shows that Kerensky didn't have a lot of support in the government. David Farrell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The Bolsheviks were led by Lenin and wanted to create a revolution, whereas the Mensheviks believed Russia was not yet ready for revolution. Both these organisations were illegal and many members had been executed or exiled to Siberia. By 1903 the activities of these opposition parties, combined with the appalling

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The source states that the man is "privileged"to see Stalin as he is such an "inspired leader".The writer says that in years to come Stalin will be viewed as a God-Like figure by the men of Russia. From what really happened in Russia we can see that Stalin was not the great man as the writer portrayed him as.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    were killed on the night of 17th July in the Ipatiev house where the execution took place. This is evident as Source C mentions, "no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred" and similarly Source D backs it up by clarifying, "all the members of

  2. Russia 1914 To 1917: Coursework : Sources Question

    This is a quote that sums up the message of the source well. It describes how reactions to ill-equipped soldiers and repeated defeats could only result in negative attitudes. The Tsar was becoming increasingly unpopular as it was seen to be his responsibility.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    exile in Siberia; this is a reliable piece of information as I know from my own knowledge on Stalin that he in fact did spend some time in Siberia in exile. In conclusion I think that if one looks deep in the source, one will be able to find useful evidence about Stalin that matches with historical facts.

  2. Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in Petrograd in 1917?

    This industrialisation was largely due to the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Witte, who was very pro industrialisation. Soon Russia was not seen by the other powers in Europe as being quite so backward as it was before and business began to flourish.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    in details as well as in the most important affairs of the factory or barracks. They had become the sole hope´┐Ż The mass lived and breathed together with the Bolsheviks." (Ibid., p. 207.) Party and class The Russian Revolution took place over nine months.

  2. Stalin and Russia - Sources Question

    Also putting the point forward that his five year plan has worked. If we take the section of the painting that shows Stalin is standing with the workers we can see again that Stalin again is standing out, he is right in the middle of the picture showing his importance once again.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work