• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources agree about what happened in Sharpeville on the morning of 21 March?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 2 (assessment Objectives2 and3) Question one Q: How far do these sources agree about what happened in Sharpeville on the morning of 21 March? Sources A and B both agree that a protest took place on the 21st of March around lunchtime. Both also agree that protesters and police were present. The police were in Saracens armoured vehicles. The sources also state the violence started around the police station. Source A: "There were plenty of police too, well armed," The police clearly expecting violence otherwise they would not be armed. The writers of these sources convey many differences in atmosphere .Source A conveys the atmosphere to be peaceful "It was like a Sunday outing" However, source B it is shown as something out of a gangster movie with lots of shootings. "There was a shooting in the morning in which African was killed and another wounded". This is quiet horrific you would not expect this to happen in broad day light with children and women around, this would defiantly make the atmosphere tense. ...read more.

Middle

The police were present in source A and B in source A they were in their Saracen's three to be precise the police were also armed expecting trouble. The picture is not very valuable because it was taken in the morning, we do not know what happened before it and only one picture was taken; it is a bad angle to look at, as all the people seem to be in one place he cannot really tell what is happening. We know the violence started at lunchtime this has taken in the morning. Source C supports Source A wore but it is unreliable because of the above reasons, therefore it could prove B to be wrong. C disagrees with the atmosphere of B. Source C is peaceful however, source B was described to be violent, this means that source C does not support source B. Source D agrees with source B because the people have besieged the car/van, the people are also holding up their thumbs but seem angry, we cannot see any children. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nearly all those who were later treated in hospital for shots in the back. This clearly shows us they were running for their lives. They also said no one provoked the police, the crowed had good intensions for a peaceful rally the police were the aggressors. The witnesses were kept in separate wards so they could not discuss what happened, this makes this source more reliable because the statements are all of their own and yet they all agree, which could make this a more reliable source. The bishop is a respectable and reliable person because he wrote the truth but he is bias because e is a member of the Anglican Church who was against segregation from the beginning. The opinions of these witnesses are not reliable as evidence because they would not say, "Oh I threw a stone at them to annoy them, then they shot me and the others ". Source F is very bias because they are all anti apartheid the facts are unbalanced they are only putting their view forward and they might want revenge having been injured. Source E is reliable ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Why was the Sharpeville Massacre Produced such different interpretations?

    Source J was written by a white reporter who was an eyewitness that said she saw policemen who were kicking women who were trying to retrieve the dead bodies.

  2. What Happened At Sharpeville On 21 March 1960- Massacre Or Self Defence?

    Whereas in source E it says "he was swinging it around in a wide arc." In source E it does not mention the amount of people that were at the protest; however source F does, "no more than 4000" Source F is likely to be most reliable.

  1. What happened at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960? Massacre or self defence?

    Also, the people shown look to be interested as is said in Source A but it cannot be proven with only two limited photos In black and white. The photos obviously do not have any sound so it cannot be said if the crowds were chanting at all or if there was gunfire.

  2. History on Sharpeville

    We have some evidence suggesting that Source A, is a little more reliable due to Humphrey Tyler, because he was an observer of these events. 2. Study Sources C and D. Do these photographs prove that either Source A or Source B are wrong?

  1. Study Source A, The Long Shadow of little Rock . What can you learn ...

    and when the public finally saw the brutality the Congress had no choice left: but to act. The main factors that contributed into helping end segregation were the media: television, protests of individuals: Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, other contributions were the international problems that America was facing during the time.

  2. South Africa and Apartheid: Have the effects of apartheid disappeared?

    In order to look at how education has changed since the end of apartheid, these factors must be taken into account as well as the graph so with this in mind, I believe that although the source does not necessarily show improvements in education, I believe that it shows signs of improvement which are yet to come.

  1. How far had the Constituent Assembly changed France by October 1791?

    Nevertheless, In July 1790 the Assembly proposed further reforms of the structure of the Church in the Civil Constitution of the Clergy: the number of bishops was reduced to 83 - one per department - and bishops as well as parish priests were to be elected by the active citizens;

  2. Segregation Sources Question

    He defends segregation as moral and something that is not only accepted by both races but benefits them also. The first thing a historian must note when evaluating this source is that it is an exert from a speech. At first glance we notice that Eastland seems to contradict himself

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work