• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources back up the view that crystal night was a spontaneous act by the German people

Extracts from this document...


How far do these sources back up the view that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous act by the German people? Kristallnacht, a massive nationwide pogrom in Germany and Austria, took place on 9/10th November. The target was Jewish citizens and it foreshadowed the events of the holocaust. Jewish properties were destroyed and more than 30,000 Jews were arrested. Was this a spontaneous (unplanned and unstructured) act by the German people or was it orchestrated by the Nazi government? Several sources are available to help answer this question; however, one must take into account the origin of the source, as people's views can be influenced by their positions. Sources A, C and D originate from the Nazi party. The Nazis would want to portray Kristallnacht as a spontaneous act by the people rather than an organised move by the government. Josef Goebbels wrote sources C and D. One is from the Nazi newsletter and the other is from Goebbel's private diary. ...read more.


At no point does it give a direct order but gives palpable hints about Hitler's wishes. Although Heydrich tries to make out that the instructions are a "precaution" in case the "expected" does occur, it indicates there is a degree of pre-planning involved. The Nazis would not have written it in so much detail unless they were sure it was going to happen. Source G is an account by a Jewish Rabbi. One must bare in mind that out of anger, he may have exaggerated the treatment from the Nazis increasing the source's unreliability. However, the fact that this is first hand evidence and he had no real reason to lie makes this source quite strong. He states that he had his home destroyed by SA (SA? Does he mean SS or SD?) And that the street was thick with SA troops. He also says that passers by shouted "down with the Jews." This source gives the impression that Kristallnacht did involve the German people but the main "demonstrators" were actually Nazis. Source F is similar to Source G. ...read more.


The following morning the citizens were shocked when they saw the carnage. Witnesses told him how Nazis made the people jeer and spit at the Jews. This is without a doubt the strongest source as it is by a neutral and it is built up with "reliable testimonials." To conclude, the sources do not back up the view that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous act by German people although the Nazi sources try to portray that it was. Nazi sources are notoriously unreliable. Sources C and D, although written by the same Nazi do not agree and Source A is too detailed to make one believe that the Nazis did not plan Kristallnacht. Source F's strength is that it was written by a person who was actually there but that person is a Jew and may have exaggerated their statement, as with Source G. Source H is the most reliable as it is by a neutral and firmly supports the claim that Kristallnacht was not a spontaneous act by the German people. One can therefore conclude that the government orchestrated it. Chris Buley Holocaust coursework History AS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far were the German people responsible for the Holocaust?

    The deputies of Hitler played an important if not the most important role in PR and its application to the Nazi regime as it gradually became more and more abominable. The first of many attempts to 'impress' The F�hrer by means of anti-Semitic acts were the Nuremberg Laws put into place in 1935.

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    This relates well to what actually happened as the league were slow in doing something about the invasion, as by the time they could do something, Italy had already invaded Abyssinia. Another way in which it proves the league is to blame is by having Italy almost falling off of the cart.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    made to look like ordinary members of the public. It states that "the activity of the fire brigade being [was] confined to spraying water on adjoining buildings" and that there was "arrest and transportation to concentration camps"; it implies arresting people, ordering the fire brigade and transporting them requires organisation so it could not have possibly been spontaneous.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Tsar Nicholas used the Jews as scapegoats for all of Russia's problems during his reign, and this clearly links in to what Hitler was doing at this point. He too was using the Jews as a scapegoat for all of Germanys problems.

  1. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Also, it is possible that Goering might have been purposely blaming Goebbels, because of the on-going conflict between them as they fought for Hitler's attention. Source I, too, has its limitations. It is a secondary source, and since the interview with Troost was carried out in 1971, long after the war, one has to question the reliability of her memory.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    It shows the Nazi's violence used towards Jews and I think that the SS and the SA are responsible for 'Kristallnacht'. Source G gives a slightly different message but still implies that the Nazis are responsible. We see a Nazi officer holding a baseball bat in his hands.

  1. History Sourcework - 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far ...

    these all come from non-Germans, who are of the opinion that, the SA or SS carried out the attack on the Jews and their property's. Source C is a report from an American consul in Germany who witnessed the events of kristallnacht unfold in front of him.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    is no evidence to show that she actually saved a single Jew. I personally think this source is reliable because it was written whilst the events in question were occurring("on December 2 1942") and so would have been fresh in the writer's mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work