• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - (a) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? Sources A and B are both extracts from American history books written in the 1970's. There are both similarities and differences between the two sources. The most obvious similarity between the two is the fact that both are from American history books from around the same time. One area of agreement between the two sources is that they both refer to the Anti-Saloon League as being important. Source A says that "Among possible explanations [of the introduction of Prohibition] we must include... the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when a large number of men were absent in the armed forces", and Source B says "In 1917 a nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing". ...read more.


Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". These two quotes are in agreement about the crime increase, because Source A says that Prohibition created a great "criminal boom" and "widespread crime", and Source B mentions the many 'speakeasies' that appeared, which were illegal places to drink, and it also mentions the violence involved. In other words, the two sources agree that the key consequence was a crime boost. However, there are also differences between the two sources. One of these is that the first paragraph of Source A is a list of reasons why this historian thinks Prohibition started, whereas Source B only mentions one reason: the Anti-Saloon League. Source A says that reasons for the introduction of Prohibition include "bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans ...read more.


It created the greatest criminal boom in American history", whereas Source B is more indirect and blames gangsters for causing the failure of Prohibition: "Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". A final difference between the sources is that Source A gives out the overall message that Prohibition was bound to fail, whereas Source B generally says that it was working for a while, where it talks about the Anti-Saloon League's "victory" of banning the use of grain, and the fact that the amendment was passed. In conclusion, the two sources only agree about Prohibition to a certain extent, and only in certain areas; there are a fair amount of both similarities and differences between them. The sources tend to agree on the importance of the Anti-Saloon League and the consequences of Prohibition, and disagree on who was to blame for the increase in crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Due to the increased support of prohibition the failure of it did not seem inevitable. Sources A-D all support this view that the failure of prohibition did not seem initially inevitable.

  2. American History Coursework

    statement, as there were some aspects of the New Deal which could be perceived as successes, whilst others could also be perceived as failures. Firstly, an example of an aspect of the New Deal which could be alleged a success would be the Tennessee Valley Authority, or the TVA.

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    Source 10 reveals the extent which prohibition affected American society, which is also supported by source 9. The extract from source 10 states,'10 years ago a dishonest policeman man was a rarity...now the honest ones are pointed out as the rarities.'

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    The author states that 'the law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages' This suggests the quote in not based on reality but is simply a hope for the future, and therefore cannot be considered reliable as it is not supported by any other means.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    One other important reason this figure may have risen so dramatically is that more people were getting cars all the time. In 1920 not that many people had a car so it was not feasible for them to commit the offence.

  2. Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I ...

    At the top of the poster it says 'The Poor Man's Club, the most expensive club in the world.' This poster is saying that women and children are suffering because all the men are spending all the families' money alcohol.

  1. ‘The Labourers’ Revolt (Swing Riots) in the Andover area was more ferocious than anywhere ...

    During the Swing Riots the demands were great in Andover so to get these demands there may have been ferocious riots. Farmers could rarely pay wages to labourers after harvest in Winchester because there was no work being done and therefore no money being made.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    Source D has a clearer message this is probably due to the fact that by 1915 support for prohibition had grown and more people had become aware of the dangers of alcohol. Both posters show a hatred of alcohol and both artists are for prohibition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work