• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - (a) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? Sources A and B are both extracts from American history books written in the 1970's. There are both similarities and differences between the two sources. The most obvious similarity between the two is the fact that both are from American history books from around the same time. One area of agreement between the two sources is that they both refer to the Anti-Saloon League as being important. Source A says that "Among possible explanations [of the introduction of Prohibition] we must include... the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when a large number of men were absent in the armed forces", and Source B says "In 1917 a nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing". ...read more.


Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". These two quotes are in agreement about the crime increase, because Source A says that Prohibition created a great "criminal boom" and "widespread crime", and Source B mentions the many 'speakeasies' that appeared, which were illegal places to drink, and it also mentions the violence involved. In other words, the two sources agree that the key consequence was a crime boost. However, there are also differences between the two sources. One of these is that the first paragraph of Source A is a list of reasons why this historian thinks Prohibition started, whereas Source B only mentions one reason: the Anti-Saloon League. Source A says that reasons for the introduction of Prohibition include "bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans ...read more.


It created the greatest criminal boom in American history", whereas Source B is more indirect and blames gangsters for causing the failure of Prohibition: "Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". A final difference between the sources is that Source A gives out the overall message that Prohibition was bound to fail, whereas Source B generally says that it was working for a while, where it talks about the Anti-Saloon League's "victory" of banning the use of grain, and the fact that the amendment was passed. In conclusion, the two sources only agree about Prohibition to a certain extent, and only in certain areas; there are a fair amount of both similarities and differences between them. The sources tend to agree on the importance of the Anti-Saloon League and the consequences of Prohibition, and disagree on who was to blame for the increase in crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Due to the increased support of prohibition the failure of it did not seem inevitable. Sources A-D all support this view that the failure of prohibition did not seem initially inevitable.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    Source C shows the effects alcohol has on men on the wife and child, while source D solely shows the effects on children. Both artists are trying to show how prohibition will be a great help to everyone and how it will make peoples lives much better and that everyone will benefit from prohibition.

  1. ‘The Labourers’ Revolt (Swing Riots) in the Andover area was more ferocious than anywhere ...

    During the Swing Riots the demands were great in Andover so to get these demands there may have been ferocious riots. Farmers could rarely pay wages to labourers after harvest in Winchester because there was no work being done and therefore no money being made.

  2. American History Coursework

    This resulted in many distinctive modifications such as the outlawing of child labour, as well as championing fair wages for the ordinary factory workers. This was greeted with an incredibly positive reception by many of the workers, and rightly so.

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    In my opinion I feel that I can only trust sources 11, 12, 13 to a certain extent. Al Capone was indeed a very popular figure, almost in a celebrity status. All three sources project Al Capone as admirable, noble and respectable.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    After discussing the reliability of both sources, I can come to the conclusion that Source E is the most reliable as evidence about prohibition. Both my own knowledge, and other sources support this. Source E is a balanced and written from an un-opinionated perspective, the author recognises the failure of

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Prohibition stated that you could not buy alcohol, but drinking some which had not been bought was alright. In that sense the hands behind their backs show that they are not doing something that bad, but in the eyes of the law this was a criminal offence.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    In 1925, 57,703 people were arrested for crimes involving drinking. Again this is still an increase from 1923 but not nearly as big an increase as that between 1920 and 1923. From these to sources it seems to me that more people were drinking, making, buying and selling more alcohol

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work