• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - (a) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? Sources A and B are both extracts from American history books written in the 1970's. There are both similarities and differences between the two sources. The most obvious similarity between the two is the fact that both are from American history books from around the same time. One area of agreement between the two sources is that they both refer to the Anti-Saloon League as being important. Source A says that "Among possible explanations [of the introduction of Prohibition] we must include... the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when a large number of men were absent in the armed forces", and Source B says "In 1917 a nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing". ...read more.

Middle

Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". These two quotes are in agreement about the crime increase, because Source A says that Prohibition created a great "criminal boom" and "widespread crime", and Source B mentions the many 'speakeasies' that appeared, which were illegal places to drink, and it also mentions the violence involved. In other words, the two sources agree that the key consequence was a crime boost. However, there are also differences between the two sources. One of these is that the first paragraph of Source A is a list of reasons why this historian thinks Prohibition started, whereas Source B only mentions one reason: the Anti-Saloon League. Source A says that reasons for the introduction of Prohibition include "bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans ...read more.

Conclusion

It created the greatest criminal boom in American history", whereas Source B is more indirect and blames gangsters for causing the failure of Prohibition: "Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". A final difference between the sources is that Source A gives out the overall message that Prohibition was bound to fail, whereas Source B generally says that it was working for a while, where it talks about the Anti-Saloon League's "victory" of banning the use of grain, and the fact that the amendment was passed. In conclusion, the two sources only agree about Prohibition to a certain extent, and only in certain areas; there are a fair amount of both similarities and differences between them. The sources tend to agree on the importance of the Anti-Saloon League and the consequences of Prohibition, and disagree on who was to blame for the increase in crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Due to the increased support of prohibition the failure of it did not seem inevitable. Sources A-D all support this view that the failure of prohibition did not seem initially inevitable.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    It supports source A about the effects and consequences of having prohibition introduced and discusses the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and how they managed to put pressure on congress into introducing prohibition. The source also mentions how the gangsters used this ban to smuggle in alcohol.

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    Sources 1-7 overall, indicate very strong support for prohibition. Prohibition worked in some rural areas, in limited ways. Source J can support this point. The supporters of prohibition could point out that there were fewer deaths from alcoholism and few arrests for drunkenness, this point however can be contradicted by source B and D both which claim the opposite.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This is implied by the language he used. Source I does show that source J is telling the truth, but the fact that they have put the Prohibition Agent before Police just shows the corruption of the people who believed in the system.

  1. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    This makes you feel sympathetic towards the children. The source does not actually show the man either; this makes you feel more critical of him. The source is implying that the children are being neglected because of their fathers drinking problems. The children are poorly dressed also. This is accompanied by another continuing caption saying "And our shoes

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Sources C and D - 2 very well known cartoons in favour of prohibition, inadvertently prove that prohibition could never work - both have the general message that men who go to saloons are willing to spend large amounts of money, indulge in "evil" and destroy their families in order to drink.

  1. American History Coursework

    Whilst seemingly every business was prospering from the boom, the problems in the agricultural industries were amassing beyond control - the income from farming had dropped from $22billion to $13billion between 1919 & 1928, & nothing was done to assist due to the Republicans lack of intervention (Laissez Faire).

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

    In the smaller picture a women is crying and the child opposite her is looking into an empty bowl. The writing above them says, "The saloon is well named "The poor mans club" - its keeps its members and their families always poor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work