• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - (a) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? Sources A and B are both extracts from American history books written in the 1970's. There are both similarities and differences between the two sources. The most obvious similarity between the two is the fact that both are from American history books from around the same time. One area of agreement between the two sources is that they both refer to the Anti-Saloon League as being important. Source A says that "Among possible explanations [of the introduction of Prohibition] we must include... the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when a large number of men were absent in the armed forces", and Source B says "In 1917 a nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing". ...read more.


Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". These two quotes are in agreement about the crime increase, because Source A says that Prohibition created a great "criminal boom" and "widespread crime", and Source B mentions the many 'speakeasies' that appeared, which were illegal places to drink, and it also mentions the violence involved. In other words, the two sources agree that the key consequence was a crime boost. However, there are also differences between the two sources. One of these is that the first paragraph of Source A is a list of reasons why this historian thinks Prohibition started, whereas Source B only mentions one reason: the Anti-Saloon League. Source A says that reasons for the introduction of Prohibition include "bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans ...read more.


It created the greatest criminal boom in American history", whereas Source B is more indirect and blames gangsters for causing the failure of Prohibition: "Gangsters... had turned the avoidance of Prohibition into big, violent business". A final difference between the sources is that Source A gives out the overall message that Prohibition was bound to fail, whereas Source B generally says that it was working for a while, where it talks about the Anti-Saloon League's "victory" of banning the use of grain, and the fact that the amendment was passed. In conclusion, the two sources only agree about Prohibition to a certain extent, and only in certain areas; there are a fair amount of both similarities and differences between them. The sources tend to agree on the importance of the Anti-Saloon League and the consequences of Prohibition, and disagree on who was to blame for the increase in crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Due to the increased support of prohibition the failure of it did not seem inevitable. Sources A-D all support this view that the failure of prohibition did not seem initially inevitable.

  2. American History Coursework

    It prevented many super-corporations from exploiting their workers' desperation for capital, and ensured that the requirements of the workers could no longer be neglected. Due to the fact that a mammoth increase in the profits of companies was not reflected in the wages of workers during the boom period, many workers would have felt fairly distressed.

  1. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    He said how saloon keepers would always welcome police officers and would expect them to drink not enforce the law, and if you tried to enforce the law you would be stationed somewhere else where there is nothing, and that it was all a conspiracy and his superior officers were

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    Also the police is talking about Chicago were many famous gangsters were known for their acts of violence people like Al Capone were very famous at the time. Capone used a mixture of violence and bribery tactics. However source I only shows that the law enforcers were willing to be bribed and were corrupted.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    increase in people drinking or alcohol being manufactured, as the Volstead Act banned this. (e) Study Sources I and J How far does Source I prove that the policeman in source J is telling the truth? Source I is a cartoon titled 'The National Gesture'.

  2. Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I ...

    Source F was more of a plan on how Prohibition should work. Not how it actually worked, as we know it was a disaster. Overall, I consider it impossible for Source F to be at all reliable as it was written before prohibition started and was written by someone who had to be biased towards prohibition.

  1. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    Source D is more poignant and emotive than Source C. It is a poster that was published in 1915. It shows a couple of children standing outside a saloon with the slogan "Daddy's in there". This makes you feel sympathetic towards the children.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    remedying the situation to the point at which the law would have been obeyed to a fair extent. Source A states that "By 1917, twenty-three states had already introduced a ban on alcohol" - this suggests that even before the law was made national, many Americans wanted the introduction of prohibition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work