• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Source Coursework A Study Sources A and B How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition? Sources A and B are both about prohibition. They explain why prohibition was introduced and the consequences it produced and agree on some points to a certain extent but disagree on others. Both sources are from American history books and therefore have an American view on it. Both sources start with the causes of prohibition and then go onto the consequences it brought. Both sources mainly agree on the consequences brought on by prohibition although source B goes into more detail. Source A explains how prohibition brought about the greatest crime boom in US history because no other law before had gone against the will of so many Americans. Source B goes further and talks about how 30,000 speakeasies opened in New York alone by 1928. 1500 prohibition agents could not enforce prohibition, and avoidance of prohibition turned into big, violent business with the involvement of gangsters such as Al-Capone and Dutch Shultz. Each source begins by stating reasons why prohibition was introduced. This is where they begin 2 disagree, source A describes five interlinked reasons why prohibition was introduced, these are: the bad influence of saloons, wartime concern for preserving grain, the feelings against German-Americans, who were important in brewing and distilling, the influence of the anti-saloon league and the association of alcohol with communism. This is different to source B, which focuses on one main reason for prohibition, the pressure that the women's temperance and anti-saloon league put on congress. They believed that alcohol was the great evil of their time and that they were leading a crusade against it. Source B also goes on to explain how transportation, sale and manufacture were banned in 1919. So although the two sources do not agree on everything there are strong similarities between them. They mainly agree on the areas concerning the consequences that prohibition brought around but disagree on the reasons why it was introduced. ...read more.

Middle

Source H is a chart of statistics published by the Philadelphia Police Department showing the number of arrests for drink related offences from 1920 to 1925. The number of arrested drunks rises dramatically over the years from 14,313 to 51,361 people; however, this again does not prove anything because it does not state how many drunks there were overall so it is possible that the only reason that the number of arrested drunks was rising was because there was more of them. The number of drunk drivers arrested also grows over the years, however the number of people arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct arrested falls. It is possible that this number falls because less people are drinking openly because of prohibition, the reason why there is more drunk drivers is probably because people are driving home rather than walking to avoid being spotted so easily. So these sources are not as useful as they first may seem. They have strong limitations as they only show half the data required to judge the success of prohibition in most cases. The sources could be more useful in proving that prohibition was a success if more information was shown, for example the whole number of drunk drivers there were instead of just those who were arrested. E Study Sources I and J How far does source I prove that the policeman in source J is telling the truth? Both sources J and I are about the corruption that prohibition caused among Americans throughout the 1920s and early 1930s. Source I is a cartoon from the time of prohibition. The title given to the cartoon is "The National Gesture". The image is of seven people with different occupations, such as a prohibition agent, policeman and a clerk. Each person is standing with the same posture they are all facing forwards with their hands out behind them as if ready to take a bribe. ...read more.

Conclusion

Where it is not obeyed it will be enforced." Kramer is determined to make prohibition a success and he has great confidence in it. Sources G and H are both statistical sources, which show information such as how much illegal alcohol was seized, and how many people were arrested for alcohol related offences. It is not possible to tell whether these sources think that prohibition will fail or succeed because the statistics do not give additional information that is needed. For example the number of gallons of spirits seized rises from 414,000 in 1921 to 11,860,000 in 1929, at first this seems like prohibition is being successful but it does not tell us how much alcohol is being produced in the first place but not being seized. So the figures given cannot be justified and therefore these sources are unsure whether prohibition will fail or succeed. Sources I and J both give the same sort of message about prohibition. Source I is a cartoon that is implying that most of the people of America are corrupt. It shows seven people standing with their hands out ready to take bribes. A policeman wrote source J. He is talking about how he was bribed without even knowing about it straight away and how his senior officers were corrupt and willing to support gangsters in exchange for money. The message behind these sources is that prohibition is just fuelling a huge crime wave, which is not stopped at all because the police force is taking bribes and therefore prohibition is never going to work. The majority of the sources believe that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. This is mainly because of the huge crime wave that the Volstead Act produced in 1920 and how most Americans wanted alcohol and prohibition had taken it away from them. Sources C and D believe that prohibition would work but these were published long before prohibition was introduced and therefore the cartoonist would have had no idea what was going to happen. Tom Wright ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Why was prohibition introduced

    In a situation like this Whites turned on Blacks. Black men were seen as filling white men's jobs; instead, the reality was that Black people became a cheap source of labor, often doing menial jobs eg. Cleaning toilets simply to make a living .Poor harvests meant those Americans living in rural areas of the "deep south" were hard hit,

  2. Prohibition - How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is ...

    However, Source I does indicate many things to us. It shows that the officials with authority did take bribes. One can, however, make a gauge that there is evidence that shows that the officer could be telling the truth. This is because Source I shows that officers were taking some bribes and Source J also shows that bribes were taken.

  1. Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen How far do you agree? I ...

    People today may argue they protested too far and in some cases went over the top while others think it was a good idea they did in the first place setup a group like this. Source B of the Article on prohibition shows what anti-saloon league protested for which was

  2. American Prohibition

    The other source is a report from a policeman talking about prohibition in Chicago and receiving a bribe from a man in the street 'he handed me an envelope... inside was $75'. Both sources speak about brides and both support the evidence that bribery was present in the prohibition era

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Despite this, a lot of these states were in the "bible belt" - a group of areas in the USA populated by a large amount of religious zealots, dotted with large numbers of small communities with strong fundamentalist religious traditions.

  2. American History Coursework

    of these states, as they had been accustomed to independently resolving situations such as this, due to the fact that the previous government, the Republicans, adopted a policy of Laissez Faire. Some influential democrats also argued that scheme such as this were not dissimilar to the USSR's methods of dealing

  1. b) Study Sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    This could represent the fact that saloons were seen as evil and dark. The two children are looking very sad and forlorn. They are standing outside the saloon door and are obviously slightly scared of it, which is not surprising as many of the men who would've passed through that door would've been drunk.

  2. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    not taking away money from people, it is still wrong and so none of it will be tolerated. However, this is where the similarities end and the reliability of the source begins to decline. Source F was a speech given in 1920.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work