• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework-Assessment 2 Studying Sources Question a) How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? Haig himself wrote source A in June 1916. He writes how a nation cannot expect to win a war without heavy casualties. It is addressed to the public and the nation in general. Haig also wrote both extracts from source B. The first is written the day before the attack and the second was from his report of the first attack. It was also written in 1916 however I would expect it to have been written before Source A because source A seems as though it is explaining the losses from the battle of the Somme. Source B is also addressed to the general public and the general nation. In detail Source A seems as though it is trying to prepare the nation for the losses it is going to bear or maybe it is trying to explain the losses from the battle of the Somme. I would not say that Source A says that Haig did not care about his soldiers lives, he is just trying prepare the nation for necessary casualties in war. He is trying to say however well prepared your soldiers are and how nothing the army can do can stop people dieing inn the war. Source B says how well the preparations are for the first day of the attack. With hindsight we can see just how untrue this source is, but did Haig know this? Haig could have been given false information by the people working under him due to fear or maybe pressure to produce good news. ...read more.

Middle

We can tell this because of the drawings that depict Haig. It also shows the Generals dressed in fine clothes and shiny boots whereas the soldiers look tatty and worn out. It is saying how the generals were not present at the actual attack and is trying to complain about it. At the time of this cartoon morale was starting to drop ad it shows an underlying unsatisfactory towards the generals at that time. In conclusion I think that to a certain extent, these two sources are useful to somebody studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme. It is very useful if they are studying public opinion and reputations but if they are studying historical facts then these would nit be very useful at all. Question d) Do Sources G and H prove that Source F is wrong? Source F is written by an historian called Laffin and is from the book 'British Butchers and Bunglers of World War'. It is a completely one sided, tunnel visioned view of Haig from somebody who comes across as ignorant and stubborn. Laffin seems as though he is unable to weigh up both sides of the argument but instead he takes one side and throws insults left right and centre. If Laffin was one of many well-known historians who had such an extreme view of Haig then people may take him seriously. In a way it almost seems as though he has such a strong opinion so that he gets himself noticed and gets paid to have his name in a book. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe that his source B shows how ill informed Haig was about the casualties and how he doesn't know the full scale to which his soldiers were killed. I f he didn't know how many were killed then he would not realise what he was doing. Source C was probably written around the time of the sixties. At this time public opinion of the generals was not very high. It was easy for the public to blame the generals for all that went wrong during the First World War. Private George Coppard tells us how the barbed wire was not cut properly to the pointy in which light could not shine through it. He describes how as many soldiers were dieing on the barbed wire as they were on the ground. The tone is almost mocking the preparations of the attack and does not have a good word to say about it. Although this seems to be a more truthful account of the offensive it is only truthful to the part of the line that he was fighting on. This does not give an accurate account of the whole line but it can tell us how bad it was in some places along the line. George Coppard could have been influenced by public opinion at the time, which would have swayed his opinions. This source tells us that in some parts of the line there were heavy losses and many soldiers were being killed however it is only true to one part of the line. In conclusion I believe that Haig did care about his soldiers however he was not given the right information by the people working under him and was seen as an easy scapegoat for the public Lee Price Fuller 11manns ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    This greatly eased the odds to which the allies were facing, and after the Spanish Influenza wiping out many German soldiers, the allies were not facing overwhelming odds to winning the war. John Terraine also claimed that 'the allied leaders deserve more credit than they had been given'.

  2. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    Blackadder Goes Forth is a comedy program and therefore tries to make jokes about various points in history and bends the truth to make it a funny program. What the man without the moustache says about the British giving the Germans a good beating is historically true as the British

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    This happened on May 31 and June 1, 1916, between the British Grand Fleet and the German High Seas Fleet. The British Grand Fleet was under the command of Admiral John Rushworth Jellicoe, and the German High Seas Fleet was commanded by Vice Admiral Reinhard von Scheer.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    war, the Cavalry Corps took three thousand prisoners and broke through lines of machine guns and artillery in the process. Although this might well have been true, his critics would still continue by saying that he relied too heavily on his cavalry, and did not put enough faith in infantry, or new technology.

  1. General Haig

    This suggests that he believes that some historians are getting the idea of his father wrong and is also persuading historians that the war had to be fought to the end by using the phrase 'serious historians'. Meaning, those who do not have that view are not serious about the history of his father General Haig.

  2. Free essay

    History why did the british lose so amny lives at the somme

    Here we see whether the losses of British men were inevitable or if they weren't what major problems should have been dealt with to prevent so many men being killed. In Source D3 it tells us that no matter how good the training of the soldiers or no superiority of ammunitions the nation must prepare o see heavy casualty lists.

  1. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    Both sides did not know how to use the new weaponry correctly, for example gas. Gas was a new form of defence, it was a very deadly weapon and it killed alot of people; mustard gas ensured that the lungs had dissolved in a matter of hours causing a slow and painful death.

  2. Haig and the other British generals were incompetent leaders. How valid is this interpretation ...

    This is also a primary source as he has a first hand experience of war. He would have this interpretation because, as a family friend, he would have had access to more information. He was educated at Eton and Oxford and, following Oxford, he entered the Foreign Service and then joined the Grenadier Guards in 1917.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work