• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does Source I prove that the policeman in Source J is telling the truth?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - (e) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources I and J. How far does Source I prove that the policeman in Source J is telling the truth? Source I is a cartoon image from the time of Prohibition. It is illustrating the artists opinion, which is that America (Chicago) was corrupt. The hand gestures from different people including a clerk, a city official, a magistrate, a politician, a policeman, and a Prohibition agent are to show that many different levels of America's people were relying on gangster payroles. Source J quotes a policeman who is also talking about America's corruption, when he says that his "superior officers" were also, as well as himself, involved in the acceptance of bribes. ...read more.


Source A can be used to back up the idea that the police were reluctant to enforce Prohibition to their full ability: "No earlier law produced such widespread crime." If the police had been enforcing Prohibition properly (and perhaps not choosing to ignore some drinkers as they sympathised with them, as undoubtedly some of the police drank alcohol themselves), then there wouldn't have been such a crime problem. Source I is likely to be strongly exaggerated as it is propaganda which sends out the message that everyone was corrupt. It was very unlikely that everyone was corrupt. However, it must contain elements of truth, otherwise people wouldn't have been able to relate to it. ...read more.


However, this could be interpreted differently. The policeman in Source J may well be lying, and he may have really accepted the bribe and not been forced into having it. If so, then Source I could actually be backing this up and saying that the police accepted bribes, but only behind their backs in secret because they don't want anybody to know if this is true, like the policeman in Source J. In conclusion, Source I can only agree with Source J, it cannot actually prove that the policeman is telling the truth as it is only a cartoon and does not give proof of anything - it is not statistics, photographic evidence or a witness account. It is also a fact that one source can never actually prove another to be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition - source based.

    The source is implying that the children are being neglected because of their fathers drinking problems. The children are poorly dressed also. This is accompanied by another continuing caption saying "And our shoes and stockings and food are in the saloon too, and they'll never come out."

  2. Prohibition - How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is ...

    One can assume that they're queuing in order to receive their handout, or 'back-hander'. This means that they were receiving bribes. The fact that this was the 'national gesture' means that everyone in the country was doing it. Therefore, this questions the integrity of all people in the USA.

  1. Study sources I and J, How far does source I prove that the policeman ...

    He is trying to say that there was nothing he could do as he was being outnumbered and 'disposed' of almost. He makes himself seem like he was almost 'bullied' into drinking the alcoholic beverage as he says, 'You couldn't pay for anything and 'the bottle was there and you were supposed to drink'.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    Source G supports this viewpoint, showing an increase on the total number of arrests for drinking-related offences, of 37,243 between the years of 1920 and 1925. Source G then also supports the view that failure of Prohibition was inevitable, as people were continuing to consume alcohol and we are not

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Also as this is only a number of the people, we could see that as some people gave bribes and so were not arrested which would show hoe ineffective and unsuccessful Prohibition was. They also hide the corruption which may show that many more were found, but not reported.

  2. Jarrow source based coursework

    It is telling us how much death rates and infant mortality has gone up from 1919 to 1931 and to 1936 .it is useful because it lets us compare Jarrow's death rates and infant mortality to the national average and lets us see what is happening through the years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work