• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far to do agree that Sir Douglas Haig is to blame for the failure at the battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Melanie Taylor: How far do you agree that sir Douglas Haig is to blame for the failures at the battle of the Somme? In the summer of 1916, Britain went into battle against a strong German army in a place called Somme in France. This war would come to be one of the most brutal and memorable battles of all time. In charge of the British army, was Sir Douglas Haig, one of the most controversial war generals ever. The failure at the battle of the somme is predominantly blamed on Haig, however what we are trying to uncover is was Haig really to blame? General Haig has been highly thought of as the main man responsible for the failures. However, upon researching this, I found an interesting statistic in the book[1]?Mud, blood and Poppycock? by Gordon Corrigan. In the battle of the Somme, 1 in 12 soldiers Commanded by Haig died. However, on the German side it was twice as high, as 1 in ever 6 died. This statistic goes to show that Haig's tactics were much more effective than the Germans, and therefore could not have been too bad. ...read more.


If anything, it was the people higher than Haig who should be taking the blame for this disaster of the Somme. Haig did not want to push forward then, he wanted to wait for a more suitable time to attack. However, as he was ordered to, he had to do what he was told. General Haig had a very rose tinted view of things, it could be said. Haig prepared for what he thought was the worst that could happen, however the Germans outdid those expectations, and went above and beyond Haig's wildest thoughts. The fight back of the Germans was unpredictable. It is said that[2]?The disaster of 1 July was because an attack on such a huge scale and of such ferocity was unprecedented. Its outcome could not have been anticipated.? With this said, it can be assumed that Haig was not to have known about the preperations the Germans had in place against the Brits. In a source that I found for myself, I found out that[3]the British troops ran rehearsals for the attack which they though were realistic, however they were not depicting that the Soldiers were not truly prepared for the attack that was coming. ...read more.


Sir Henry Rawlinson had very different ideas to Haig, however (perhaps) because Rawlinson was younger and had less experience to back up his suggestions, Haig decided to disregard them and carry on with his own failing battle plans. This shows that Haig, no matter how much he knew his own plans were failing, was still not prepared to disregard them for ones of younger yet smarter people. Conclusively, the evidence that I have gathered depicts that Haig was responsible for the failures of the Somme as if he hadn't have been so stubborn and listened to others then he may have succeeded more. Also, his lack of experience as a general and old style tactics really lowered every chance they had of succeeding in the war. With all this considered, I believe it is not ?taking the easy route out to find someone to blame,? I genuinely believe that Haig was responsible. I will not conclude that he was fully to blame, as I do think that there were other contributing factors, but with the evidence I have looked at Haig seems to be the sensible person to blame as after all, his decisions were crucial, an he made them wrong. ________________ [1]Mud Blood and Poppycock ? Gordon Corrigan [2]School source [3]http://patrick-hinton.suite101.com/did-douglas-haig-fail-in-world-war-one-a92774 [4]School source. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    What was really needed was to be pro-defensive, and let the enemy come to you. This way, you could counter strategies more easily, and improve conditions for soldiers. Unfortunately, this way of thinking did not convince the allied generals until near the end of the war; and was used well in battles such as Cambrai and of the Hindenburg line.


    He wanted to make sure that no king could ever rule again without calling a parliament. Charles's two chief ministers, Strafford and Laud were imprisoned; Strafford was soon executed for treason (going against the king). I think that Parliament went over the limit when they ordered Strafford to get executed

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    military history, and, but for lack of reserves, the British might have achieved a breakthrough. As it was, the British drove a five mile salient into the German lines. German counter-attacks, however, compelled the British to yield most of the newly won ground.

  2. Were the police to blame for Jack the Ripper not being caught

    much as they can, (or that they aren't, but want the public to think they are'. However, if the police used the advice of one letter which was to use fingerprints, they could've found his prints on a crime scene, then search for him.

  1. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    The Navy also lost three destroyers, auxiliary crafts and a steamer. These also show that Dunkirk was a great disaster. The second part of Source E says: "Tired, dirty, hungry they came back - unbeatable." This shows that against all odds, the BEF were supreme and indomitable.

  2. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    Haig had to work with poorly trained men during World War One. This was a large difference compared to the highly trained BEF with whom he worked with previously. The people he had to work with during these later days had no understanding of war and were unskilled in fighting.

  1. How much were generals such as Douglas Haig to blame for the huge number ...

    He thought that a cavalry breakthrough after an initial artillery bombardment could be adapted to all battles. In an article he wrote "Aeroplanes and tanks are only accessories to the men and the horse, and I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use

  2. General Haig

    However, this source is not entirely reliable because these are all probable ideas from one man, and they are his conclusions as of what Haig was and why he did things in the way he did. It is still quite useful though as it does support Keegan's interpretations in some

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work