• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far to do agree that Sir Douglas Haig is to blame for the failure at the battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Melanie Taylor: How far do you agree that sir Douglas Haig is to blame for the failures at the battle of the Somme? In the summer of 1916, Britain went into battle against a strong German army in a place called Somme in France. This war would come to be one of the most brutal and memorable battles of all time. In charge of the British army, was Sir Douglas Haig, one of the most controversial war generals ever. The failure at the battle of the somme is predominantly blamed on Haig, however what we are trying to uncover is was Haig really to blame? General Haig has been highly thought of as the main man responsible for the failures. However, upon researching this, I found an interesting statistic in the book[1]?Mud, blood and Poppycock? by Gordon Corrigan. In the battle of the Somme, 1 in 12 soldiers Commanded by Haig died. However, on the German side it was twice as high, as 1 in ever 6 died. This statistic goes to show that Haig's tactics were much more effective than the Germans, and therefore could not have been too bad. ...read more.


If anything, it was the people higher than Haig who should be taking the blame for this disaster of the Somme. Haig did not want to push forward then, he wanted to wait for a more suitable time to attack. However, as he was ordered to, he had to do what he was told. General Haig had a very rose tinted view of things, it could be said. Haig prepared for what he thought was the worst that could happen, however the Germans outdid those expectations, and went above and beyond Haig's wildest thoughts. The fight back of the Germans was unpredictable. It is said that[2]?The disaster of 1 July was because an attack on such a huge scale and of such ferocity was unprecedented. Its outcome could not have been anticipated.? With this said, it can be assumed that Haig was not to have known about the preperations the Germans had in place against the Brits. In a source that I found for myself, I found out that[3]the British troops ran rehearsals for the attack which they though were realistic, however they were not depicting that the Soldiers were not truly prepared for the attack that was coming. ...read more.


Sir Henry Rawlinson had very different ideas to Haig, however (perhaps) because Rawlinson was younger and had less experience to back up his suggestions, Haig decided to disregard them and carry on with his own failing battle plans. This shows that Haig, no matter how much he knew his own plans were failing, was still not prepared to disregard them for ones of younger yet smarter people. Conclusively, the evidence that I have gathered depicts that Haig was responsible for the failures of the Somme as if he hadn't have been so stubborn and listened to others then he may have succeeded more. Also, his lack of experience as a general and old style tactics really lowered every chance they had of succeeding in the war. With all this considered, I believe it is not ?taking the easy route out to find someone to blame,? I genuinely believe that Haig was responsible. I will not conclude that he was fully to blame, as I do think that there were other contributing factors, but with the evidence I have looked at Haig seems to be the sensible person to blame as after all, his decisions were crucial, an he made them wrong. ________________ [1]Mud Blood and Poppycock ? Gordon Corrigan [2]School source [3]http://patrick-hinton.suite101.com/did-douglas-haig-fail-in-world-war-one-a92774 [4]School source. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    What was really needed was to be pro-defensive, and let the enemy come to you. This way, you could counter strategies more easily, and improve conditions for soldiers. Unfortunately, this way of thinking did not convince the allied generals until near the end of the war; and was used well in battles such as Cambrai and of the Hindenburg line.

  2. How much were generals such as Douglas Haig to blame for the huge number ...

    It was the inventions such as the machine-gun, barbed wire, and the magazine-fed-rifle that made advance so difficult. And as Haig's education had been before the wide spread use of these, he did not account for them when planning. Haig did however make some very critical mistakes.


    running England and to that he sent all the members of the parliament home and ruled without them for the next eleven years. It had not been easy for him as he was always been short of money. He had to think of way of getting money without asking the parliaments help.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    However, since the rain had made the ground so bad, the bombardment made the ground into a swamp. The second phase of the operation was another success for Haig. He pushed the Germans back five miles and inflicted heavy losses on them of two hundred and fifty thousand men.

  1. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    Also, most of Haig's experience was with the cavalry. However, this cannot be blamed on Haig, but the person who appointed him. Haig is not responsible for this failure. The main part of Haig's experience was with the cavalry. Haig's previous reliance on horses seemed to stretch through to the First World War.

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    The energy and morale played a big roles, as the British had quite high morale and energy as they were succeeding and driving away and destroying the Germans and also forcing them to change tactics, however it was opposite in the German corner as they were loosing me and planes rapidly.

  1. Were the police to blame for Jack the Ripper not being caught

    The letter is to notify Lusk why 'offering reward for the discovery criminals was discontinued.' This probably would have been sent because George Lusk was head of the Mile End Vigilance Committee, and might of asked why they weren't using a reward system.

  2. General Douglas Haig

    The phrases 'It was high time my father was given credit' leads me to believe that they had a close friendly relationship and wanted to praise one another. Source F is another balanced source that points out both the positive and negative qualities of Haig.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work