• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far to sources G and H agree about the chances of success for the British attack at Ypres in 1917? Explain your answers.

Extracts from this document...


How far to sources G and H agree about the chances of success for the British attack at Ypres in 1917? Explain your answers. As you can see both of the sources have agreed and disagreed in many aspects. They tend to agree on the small matters and disagree on the major points and opinions. I am going to analyse the sources and then write about all of the points in which they agree and disagree. Gough's account talks about the torrential rain that fell before, during and after the battle took place. "The number of tanks... were rendered almost powerless by the heavy and continuous rain." He then goes on to tell us about the adverse conditions that his soldiers had to work in, and about the difficult job his soldiers were going to have getting past the fire of the pill boxes which where not accounted for because intelligence didn't manage to pick them up. ...read more.


Source H written by A J P Taylor talks again about the adverse weather conditions that the army had to fight in. He tells us about the German front line being also ready and when the attack came around they never got near to thee front line because of the everlasting rain, which fell. He gives descriptions about what happened to what he set out on to the battlefield "The ground churned up by the shellfire turned to mud. Men struggling to advance, sank up to their waists... Haig sent in tanks. They also disappeared". And in the end of this source Taylor goes on t say that in the end the battle was not to get to Zeebrugge and Ostend but to kill as many Germans as possible and to shake up there morale. ...read more.


Gough also disagrees about the way in which they have lost resources. Taylor talks more about the loss of the men, guns and the morale of the men. But Gough only talks about the loss of lives due to the lack of morale and belief in there effort. But overall, these sources give a very negative impression of how Britain was doing at Ypres. A combination of situations put the allied forces with a slim chance of victory against Germany right from the very start. Sources G and H vary slightly in their descriptions and thought of the 3rd battle, and so I feel that it is air to say that they agree to a large extent. Points that each source mention do not constrict the general opinion that they both give, and that the others talk about. So from this evidence I think that sources G and H agree with each other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig in sources

    Some of those offer very different interpretations of Haig's ability as a commander. Before Haig became a commander and chief of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) during the First World War. He was sent to India with his regiment, he experience active action in Sudan (1898)

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    When looking at all the evidence available to us it is clear that although evacuation was not a "great" success as there were a great deal of setbacks, such as the children who did not go and children who returned home it was quite successful as the government did secure the objective of reducing civilian casualties.

  1. Do these sources agree or disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's ...

    The morale was at such a low point because Haig was continuing to use the same attritional tactics, which resulted in 'appalling casualties'.

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    These extremes of class dissimilarity elevate the situation further, as opposed to a less significant variation. However, this extremity is relevant to the reliability of the source. It is secondary, as it is an interview held in 1988. Apparently, the interviewee (the mother of the host family)

  1. 'The British offensive on the Sommewas doomed to be a disaster from the start ...

    arrived at the trenches in a hail of machine gun fire they then had to cut their way through twenty yards of mangled barbed wire as well. However even as they saw their fellow soldiers fall the British soldiers did not duck or run, for they feared resisting their generals almost as much as they feared their enemies.

  2. The Third Battle of Ypres

    The water table was near the surface, even at the height of summer, and this reclaimed land was extremely vulnerable to shellfire that would destroy the drainage system and allow the land to flood. There was no layer of gravel and flooding would rapidly turn the whole battlefield into mud once the shelling started.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work