• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Bizmarck responsible for Prussian domination of Germany by 1866?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Essay- Luke Vaggers 14/10/02 How far was Bizmarck responsible for Prussian domination of Germany by 1866? In 1866 Prussia defeated Austria, which enabled Bizmarck to dissolve the German Confederation and exclude Austria from German affairs for good. However there is a great historical debate over how much of a role Bizmarck actually played in the eventual Prussian domination of a united Germany. There is no doubt that he played an important part but other factors must be considered for instance how important the years previous to 1862 when Bizmarck came to power were. Whether he had a master plan all along and therefore very skilfully brought about unification or whether he was a great opportunist who simply took advantage of events as they happened will be discussed. Undeniably he played a major role but he didn't unify Germany single-handed on his entry to power he was given a great situation in which unification was possible. W.E Moss once said "If Bismarck played his hand with great skill, it was good hand in the first" he was given these good cards in 1862 after years of political, military and nationalistic advancement he was able to take the final step and unify Germany. ...read more.

Middle

Fortunately for him the situation in Germany was quite favourable as well. Nationalism and Liberalism two beliefs quite closely related had been on the increase since 1815 after the successful economic union people were a lot less against union. Most Prussians and the king resented the defeat at Olmutz and so were not really opposed to Bismarck's anti-Austrian policy. Also Prussian liberals in the Lantag were ready to trade in their liberal views in exchange for German unification, also the businessman of the powerful organisation the Nationalverin were for unification. The image that Bizmarck struggled alone to unite Germany is a false one he had the favourable situation both foreign and at home for which unification could take place. The defeat of Austria in the 1866 war is clearly a very important, it gave Bizmarck the ability to dissolve the German confederation and exclude Austria from German affairs. This took Prussia a long way in following the Kleindeutsch plan and the reason for the victory was certainly not all down to Bizmarck but again to the years previous to 1862 and to the minister presidents before. Generations of Prussian leaders had pumped large amounts of money into the army e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

However as always there is also a strong argument against this belief, they believe his real aim was to preserve and extend Prussian control and that he followed the clever policy of "two irons in the fire" meaning that there were always possibilities. They believe he intervened in the Schleswig-Holstein affair because of his hatred of the poles, that he never ensured French neutrality, seen by how wary he was of it being a long war as France could intervene and take all their gains and that he actually hoped to unite Germany peacefully without war if possible. 'The Master' planner view is probably the most unlikely from letters and speeches at the time the idea that he was at heart just a Junker who wanted to keep the same strong society in Prussia is probably more realistic. However the fact of the matter is in 1862 Otto Von Bizmarck came to power and in a matter of years German Unification took place, how much of a part he actually played is part of an endless debate the situation and prospects for Prussia were so good, the analogy that he was given a great hand on his entry into power and all he had to do was play it with good timing is probably quite a good one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    unified Italy would almost naturally emerge by means of common interest and nationalist ideals. The parochial nature of society and the failure of the provisional governments to unite in their actions were inter-dependant. This is because it is the nature of the society which caused the provisional governments to act

  2. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    The war lasted for 7 weeks. Finally Austria was defeated. * After the Seven Week's War, the Treaty of Prague was signed between Prussia and Austria. * In the treaty, both Schleswig and Holstein were under the control of Prussia.

  1. Why has Prussia replaced Austria as the leading Germanic power by 1870?

    He had given each of them something.' Many historians agree with Waller, in that Bismarck's way of using European relationships as well as the Prussian economy to his advantage shows how important he was for Prussian dominance. However, other historians disagree.

  2. ITALIAN UNIFICATION

    He soon got a reputation as a liberal, non-revolutionary politician. In 1850 he was appointed Minister of Agriculture, Commerce and the navy. Cavour then put his economic beliefs into reality by making free trade treaties with France, Britain, Belgium and even Austria.

  1. How far can Germany be held responsible for WWI?

    By researching government documents, many never before seen by normal citizens, Fisher drew that the Kaiser's government cold bloodedly planned the outbreak of WWI from 1912 onwards. "Fischer believes that the First World War was no preventative war, born out of fear and desperation; it was planned and launched by Germany with the aggressive aim of dominating Europe."

  2. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    Many historians, politicians and journalists tend to place the blame on the British, and their poor organization. Historian's R. Ernest Dupuy and Trevor N. Dupuy said; "With the exception of the Crimean War, the Gallipoli Expedition was the most poorly mounted and ineptly controlled operation in British military history."12 In

  1. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    the setting up of the Erfurt Parliament by Prussia; this, again, added up to Austria's weaknesses, as now her Frankfurt Diet was rivalled by the Erfurt Parliament. Although the situation heated up between the two assemblies over the Hesse-Cassel dispute, forcing Prussia to abandon the Prussian Union Plan at the

  2. What contribution did the Zollverein make to the unification of Germany?

    Even in 1830, Prussia's finance minister indicated to Frederick William III that such a union could isolate Austria from German affairs. Hence, in spite of Austria's preeminence in the Bund, Germany's principal political focal point, there was a separate entity around which Kleindeutschland enthusiasts could gather.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work