• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Bizmarck responsible for Prussian domination of Germany by 1866?

Extracts from this document...


History Essay- Luke Vaggers 14/10/02 How far was Bizmarck responsible for Prussian domination of Germany by 1866? In 1866 Prussia defeated Austria, which enabled Bizmarck to dissolve the German Confederation and exclude Austria from German affairs for good. However there is a great historical debate over how much of a role Bizmarck actually played in the eventual Prussian domination of a united Germany. There is no doubt that he played an important part but other factors must be considered for instance how important the years previous to 1862 when Bizmarck came to power were. Whether he had a master plan all along and therefore very skilfully brought about unification or whether he was a great opportunist who simply took advantage of events as they happened will be discussed. Undeniably he played a major role but he didn't unify Germany single-handed on his entry to power he was given a great situation in which unification was possible. W.E Moss once said "If Bismarck played his hand with great skill, it was good hand in the first" he was given these good cards in 1862 after years of political, military and nationalistic advancement he was able to take the final step and unify Germany. ...read more.


Fortunately for him the situation in Germany was quite favourable as well. Nationalism and Liberalism two beliefs quite closely related had been on the increase since 1815 after the successful economic union people were a lot less against union. Most Prussians and the king resented the defeat at Olmutz and so were not really opposed to Bismarck's anti-Austrian policy. Also Prussian liberals in the Lantag were ready to trade in their liberal views in exchange for German unification, also the businessman of the powerful organisation the Nationalverin were for unification. The image that Bizmarck struggled alone to unite Germany is a false one he had the favourable situation both foreign and at home for which unification could take place. The defeat of Austria in the 1866 war is clearly a very important, it gave Bizmarck the ability to dissolve the German confederation and exclude Austria from German affairs. This took Prussia a long way in following the Kleindeutsch plan and the reason for the victory was certainly not all down to Bizmarck but again to the years previous to 1862 and to the minister presidents before. Generations of Prussian leaders had pumped large amounts of money into the army e.g. ...read more.


However as always there is also a strong argument against this belief, they believe his real aim was to preserve and extend Prussian control and that he followed the clever policy of "two irons in the fire" meaning that there were always possibilities. They believe he intervened in the Schleswig-Holstein affair because of his hatred of the poles, that he never ensured French neutrality, seen by how wary he was of it being a long war as France could intervene and take all their gains and that he actually hoped to unite Germany peacefully without war if possible. 'The Master' planner view is probably the most unlikely from letters and speeches at the time the idea that he was at heart just a Junker who wanted to keep the same strong society in Prussia is probably more realistic. However the fact of the matter is in 1862 Otto Von Bizmarck came to power and in a matter of years German Unification took place, how much of a part he actually played is part of an endless debate the situation and prospects for Prussia were so good, the analogy that he was given a great hand on his entry into power and all he had to do was play it with good timing is probably quite a good one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. What contribution did the Zollverein make to the unification of Germany?

    The economic unity of the German states was not the only factor in German Unification. Whilst the members of the Zollverein were partly surrendering their sovereignty to the Prussians in the 1830s and 1840s, many fellow German buffer states felt the threat of a French invasion and looked to Prussia for military protection.

  2. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    The war lasted for 7 weeks. Finally Austria was defeated. * After the Seven Week's War, the Treaty of Prague was signed between Prussia and Austria. * In the treaty, both Schleswig and Holstein were under the control of Prussia.

  1. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    ruler whereas the radicals disagreed and wanted the eventual formation of an Italian republic. It can be seen that this was a more important factor than having a universally accepted national leader because if the provisional governments had cooperated then there was no need for a national leader because a

  2. Why has Prussia replaced Austria as the leading Germanic power by 1870?

    The plan was to slowly gain territory through small wars, like with the Danes for Schleswig, then make peace and non-intervention treaties, like with Italy and the small states in 1866, before attacking his main enemies, France and Austria, to become the most dominant power in Europe.

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    He stated "The Dardanelles could be forced with enough warships and minesweepers in a three stage plan. First, we would neutralise the Turkish forts guarding the entrance, then clear the Turkish minefields, and finally, drive into the Sea of the Maramara the Turkish troops."

  2. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    This was not only a blow to Austrian prestige, therefore influencing public opinion in the German states, but, in my opinion, it also prevented a future fear of an Austro-Russian alliance as it had happened in the past, forcing Prussian climb-down at Olmutz.


    Mazzini never accepted the monarchial united Italy and continued to fight for a democratic republic until his death in 1872. Count Camillo Benso di Cavour (1811- 1861) He was born in Piedmont while it was still under Napoleonic rule. He was the second son of a rich noble family and

  2. How far can Germany be held responsible for WWI?

    Fisher alleged that domestic factors were the chief moving force behind German foreign policy, which was looked upon by the Kaiser and his government as a key tool in diverting attention away from domestic discontentment. Ritter however concludes that Germany only wished to support Austria Hungry, her only firm ally,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work