• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war Efforts on the Western Front 1916 - 1917?

Extracts from this document...


How Far was General Haig responsible for the Failings of the British War Effort on the Western Front 1916 - 1917? The British war effort on the western front, 1916 - 1917 are widely viewed as an awful failure. The efforts and tactics of General Douglas Haig have been the subject of many arguments over the past eighty years. Some regard him as the figure who led Britain to victory, whereas others see him as the "Butcher of the Somme" who led thousands upon thousands of men to their death. Whether he is solely responsible or not remains undecided. However, by analysing his mistakes and failures, it may be possible to form a strong conclusion and decide whether or not Haig can be entirely blamed. General Haig was born to a wealthy family in 1861. He was educated at Clifton and Brasenose College, Oxford and entered the Royal Military College at Sandhurst straight afterwards. He fought in the cavalry in battles such as the Boer war. This, it would seem, provided him with the experience to lead troops into battle; but was it the relevant experience that the job required? His old fashioned style of training was not compatible with the development of technological weapons and his out of date tactics did not consider the technology used by the opposition or the onslaught of the arms race. ...read more.


As no one knew how to fight like this, the old tactics were relied on. This was much the same as the situation with the new weaponry. No one knew how to use these new weapons and a lack of understanding lead to contempt of the weapons. As no one knew how to use them, there was no one to teach the skills. This meant that advances in technology were put aside and the old way of fighting was used against the highly trained Germans. This, also, is not Haig's fault, although he did fail to adapt his tactics after many failed battles. Haig, therefore, only played a small part in this failure. Haig was appointed Field Marshall at the age of 54. This means that his training was extremely out dated (particularly due to the arms race), and this was likely to affect the tactics that he used. His experience was in wars such as the Boer war. These were won easily due to the oppositions lack of organisation and lack of what was then, modern weaponry. This suggests that Haig was not ready for the modern way of fighting. Also, most of Haig's experience was with the cavalry. ...read more.


Is it fair, therefore, to blame Haig completely for these failures? Is it possible to view Haig as a failure considering that Britain did win the war? Some would argue that he was a failure due to the mass loss of life that occurred under his instruction. However, Haig had warned people of this: "... The nation must be taught to bear losses... The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists..." This would suggest that Haig was not a complete failure. It seems that the British people just didn't comprehend the extent of the loss of which they had been forewarned. He cannot be seen as responsible for this. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that Haig was responsible for the failings of the British war effort on the western front 1916 - 1917. However, it is impossible to lay the blame solely on Haig. His superiors failed to act despite the intolerable death toll and despite the loss of life, Haig was allowed to continue using his costly tactics. Also, it is impossible to identify Haig as a complete failure as he did eventually help Britain to win the war. However, his failings were unacceptable and he was unworthy of the gratifications he received when he returned from the war. He was, however, worthy of the title "The Butcher of the Somme". ?? ?? ?? ?? Oliver Newland History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    French that they would do whatever was in their power to aid their allies. Haig would have felt it would be necessary to honour the allegiance, as this could be beneficial during and after the war. So, with justification, he called on the tanks to 'surprise [the Germans] to break the stalemate'.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    I believe that George had not had all the information in source I and that was the purpose for his change in opinion. I also feel that in Source J, George had been given all the relevant information and consequences of Haigs actions, and that if he had kept to

  1. 'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the leadership of Douglas ...

    Haig achieved that fatal blow towards the end of the war. The blow that won a war could not have been achieved had not the improved tactics of Haig's BEF been applied. Did Haig deserve his reputation as a callous general?

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Yet, in the first few months of 1918, it seemed that the Germans had mysteriously acquired a functioning whetstone. The Germans launched three offensives in the early months of 1918, those of Michael, Georgette and Blucher-Yorck. Each made huge gains in France, and Michael reached within five miles of Amiens, the main communications centre of France.

  1. World war 1

    Haig's strategy during the Battle of Somme; this gain shows that Haig did not care about his men and supports the view even further. The book also states, 'He knew he had no chance of breakthrough but still sent men to their deaths', this is talking about the four months of attack after the 1st July.

  2. General Haig

    This shows that Captain Blackadder feels that the General is insane in sending them out to battle which will ultimately end up in death. Also it quotes "We're going over the top...after sitting here since Christmas 1914, during which millions of men have died and we've advanced no further than an asthmatic ant carrying some heavy shopping."

  1. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    The Derby Scheme used door-to-door visits. Lord Kitchener was on posters saying "Your country needs you!" Many institutions helped to recruit for the war. Groups of friends from factories, football teams, banks etc were encouraged to enlist together and called the "Pals Battalions".

  2. How far to do agree that Sir Douglas Haig is to blame for the ...

    This could not have been helped by Haig. Haig's idea was to move forward and progress all the time, therefore they couldn?t build permanent shelter; It wasn't possible. This was just the nature of the job they had to do, their momentum?s were low and damaged, Haig could do nothing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work