• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Was Gorbachev Responsible For The End Of Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Was Gorbachev Responsible For The End Of Soviet Union? Many factors influenced the end of the USSR and it is far too simplistic to say that a certain factor was wholly Gorbachev's fault or was wholly free of Gorbachev's ideas. For example, the ideas of perestroika, glasnost, and his actions were generally caused by Gorbachev. However, elements of nationalism, the economy and unpopularity only contain a few examples of Gorbachev not being directly responsible. Some factors to do with the end of the Soviet Union had nothing to do with Gorbachev. There are also cases where Gorbachev is shown to be trying to keep the USSR intact. Another element to consider is that various factors affected the stability of the Soviet Union to varying degrees. It is only by debating these topics can we come to a judgement on how far he was or was not responsible for the end of the Soviet Union. There are examples of Gorbachev weakening the Soviet Union. Zubok in particular argues that Gorbachev's personality helped to destabilize the USSR. This is a valid argument because the strength of a nation to prosper is dependent on the strength of character of its leader, for example Stalin was a leader of strong personality (for all his flaws) and his country did prosper for a short time. There is the belief that Gorbachev was of "weak character" (ZA P62). This quote is particularly useful because it is a quote of Chernyaev, a strong supporter of Gorbachev who is now arguing the opposite of what someone with his ideals of Gorbachev would be. The piece is corroborated to some extent by Yeltsin who says Gorbachev was the lover of "half measures and half steps" (AtG P262), which infers that Gorbachev would not commit fully. Zubok also gives the prevailing view that Gorbachev suffered "naivety" (ZA P73) and that he had "overreached himself" (ZA P73). ...read more.

Middle

This would stress an already weakened system due to perestroika to the point of breaking. Following the fall of the Berlin wall, the "self confidence of people power [was] immeasurably enhanced" (R+FotSE P131) and this would encourage more demonstrations, as people knew they had a chance to succeed. Because of glasnost, the Afghan war became televised and this galvanized the government's unpopularity, just as the televised Vietnam War had a detrimental effect on the US administration. Historical research permitted by glasnost had a negative impact on the Soviet Union, strengthening hostility to the regime. The massacres of poles at Katyn, and the discovery of mass graves in the Ukraine and Belorussia all alienated people from the regime, which weakened the USSR because the government no longer had a strong power base. The Nazi-Soviet Pact "galvanized Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania into nationalist protest" (R+FotSE P119). Other examples of the "excesses of the Stalin era" had the effect of reviving the "nationalist campaigns of the non-Russian bloc" (R+FotSE P119). The rise of nationalist movements in a country is not a sign of strength but of weakness. Following the broadcasting of the Supreme Soviet on television, an "entire population awakened" (AtG P246) politically. This population had access to western thought because of openness, such as human rights and democracy. The principle of democracy undermined the Soviet position because it advocates the creation of more than one party, which goes against the basis of Soviet power. These examples show glasnost having a negative impact on the USSR. It can be debated that glasnost had decisive advantages, such as politicians actions would now be open to the public to view, making leaders accountable to the people. This is a vital element to democracy and in this respect glasnost would strengthen the new democracy in the USSR, making the country more stable. Also openness is beneficial in exposing corruption, as in the Tehelka case in India. ...read more.

Conclusion

These demonstrate that Gorbachev was deeply concerned with keeping the USSR intact. This can be further demonstrated by the Union Treaty in which he tries to preserve the USSR. Another example would be the economic blockade of Lithuania following its calls for independence, a measure designed to force it to stay in the Union. These measures do demonstrate that Gorbachev tried to keep the USSR intact, but for all this, it still broke up. His policies weakened the Union but did not cause the USSR to break-up directly. Gorbachev certainly caused the weakening of the USSR, in the form of his actions, perestroika and glasnost. Other factors such as nationalism, economic factors and unpopularity also contributed to the weakening of the Soviet state. However these factors did not cause the immediate end of the USSR. Rather the end of the Soviet Union can be attributed to the failure of the August coup and the subsequent of Yeltsin. Gorbachev did not cause the coup directly, so the end of the USSR cannot be attributed to him. In this respect, the opinion of Zubok: "without Gorbachev, the dismantling of the cold war could not have happened as quickly as it did" (ZA P93) is not valid. The quote can be inferred to say that Gorbachev created the conditions for the coup, but the actual act in itself Gorbachev was not associated with. It is interesting to note that had the August coup not occurred, the Union Treaty would have come into effect and the USSR would have strengthened, perhaps enough to silence separatist voices in the Baltic states, though this would be an extreme case. The failed coup itself lead to the break-up of the Soviet Union as it secured the rise of anti-Soviet forces such as Yeltsin, who subsequently went on to abolish key aspects of the USSR such as the CPSU. Gorbachev was not responsible for the end of the USSR, only responsible for the weakening of the Soviet Union, it was the coup that gave the "final blow" to break-up the USSR. 15th January 2004 1 of 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the relationship between the USA and USSR change between 1975 and 1990

    This meet broke down as the USA refused to give up their Star Wars programme. However Gorbachev confirmed to Regan that the USSR would withdraw from Afghanistan and that no more Russian nuclear tests would take place if the US did not test any either.

  2. Explain why the USA and the Soviet Union did not trust eachother after the ...

    On the 8th of May the Germans had fully surrendered and the occupying forces moved into the country. Both Germany and Berlin was split up into four sectors. Britain, France, America and the USA were each give a sector. Communist and Capitalist were now living side by side in the same city.

  1. To what extent were Fulgencio Batista's weaknesses the cause for Fidel Castro's rise to ...

    - Additionally, population grew, but had no access to education, health or housing facilities. People wanted a change. The government responded with more terror and repression. -Afro-Cubans suffered greater unemployment, poorer health care and earned lower wages: they felt discriminated, so they joined guerrilla groups.

  2. Explain the part played by external pressure (for example, economic sanctions and international isolation ...

    cricket, rugby and athletics. Increasingly South Africa was cut off from International sports. After South Africa left commonwealth there were no more participations in the UN, 1964 onwards and because of this South Africa was banned from the Olympics. This increased disruptions of South African teams abroad.

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis: Was President Kennedy the Saviour of the Cuban Missile Crisis?

    In return for the removal of all Soviet missiles from Cuba, Kennedy agreed to remove some of the hundreds of US missiles in Europe that were targeted at the Soviet Union. Accordingly, in November 1962 the Soviets dismantled their weapons on the island and a few months later the US government reciprocated by withdrawing missiles from Britain, Italy and Turkey.

  2. How did the Red scare and McCarthyism become such a dominant force in the ...

    He never produced any evidence to back his claims, but still ruined many lives. He attacked many people, of all different backgrounds and lives. E.g. Charlie Chaplin, who left USA, and moved to Switzerland, Lee. J. Cobb and Paul Robson.

  1. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    the Vietnam War * Following the expulsion of the French from Vietnam in 1954 the country was divided into communist North (Ho Chi Minh) and non-communist South (Ngo Dinh Diem) * Provision made for elections to reunite the country under a single government --> never held * A civil government

  2. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    was a continual reminder to East Berliners of their low standard of living. The wall would prevent all these things from occurring. A further key feature was that Kennedy provoked the USSR by pulling more troops into West Berlin. The soviet tanks did not allow any crossings into the East.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work