How far was Haig responsible for the failings of British war effort on the Western front 1916

Authors Avatar

Pi Scott

 How far was General Haig responsible for the failings of British war effort on the Western front 1916-1917?

         In this essay I am going to tell the responsibility of General Haig in the failings of British war effort on the Western Front. Sir Douglas Haig was born on June 19, 1861, in Edinburgh, Scotland. He was educated at Brasenose College, Oxford University, and the Royal Military College at Sandhurst. Haig commanded the British 1st Corps as part of the British Expeditionary Force sent to France in World War 1 in 1916 replacing the job of Sir John French. General Haig now commanded over 1 million men and it was the biggest army in Britain. The Western Front was the key battle arena in the Great War. Most people believed that the Great War was going to be won on the Western Front this was because most of the troops on both sides are stationed along the Western Front and if the Germans brake through the Western Front they will take over Europe. The fighting method of World War 1 was very memorable because it was the first big war that was fought in trenches, so the war was stalemate. This was a different fighting method to all the fighting method used before so not many people knew what to do. General Haig was a very memorable general because he was criticized by many historians for being a butcher rather than a war winner. This was because under his command many British soldiers were killed.

         The traditional view of General Haig’s role in the battle of the Somme and the 3rd Ypres was that Haig was “Butcher of Somme”. It was like ‘Lions led by Donkeys’. The commanders were ‘Donkeys’, they were incompetent and didn’t take care of their soldiers, the ‘Lions’. The commanders sat in safety behind the lines while they sent their troops charging against enemy machine guns and barbed wire. The soldiers resented their commanders and only obeyed them because otherwise they would get shot. General Haig was an old fashioned and a very religious man. A critic of Haig, Dr. Laffin, said that Haig saw himself as an instrument of god. General Haig never visited the front line so he did not know what the conditions were like. General Haig is also called a ‘Bungler and Butcher’ by critics. This means that Haig was a careless man and sends many people to their deaths. What the critics called Haig was very true in the Battle of the Somme. General Haig also said “Machine gun is a much overrated weapon” this statement is wrong because it was the weapon which killed most people in the War. It killed more people than the artillery or the tanks.

Join now!

          There are some views that are put forward recently that shows General Haig in a more sympathetic light. The reason General Haig never visited the front line was because back then it was not expected for him to visit the frontlines but it was expected for him to stay behind and command the attacks, as Trevor Wilson of Adelaide unit said “Its better for Haig to be at Headquarters receiving information. The basic problem for the western front was to get soldiers out of the trenches and across no-mans land with the least amount of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay