• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Nicholas II responsible for the collapse of the tsarist regime?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History seminar Girum Zerihun Mr. Hunt How far was Nicholas II responsible for the collapse of the tsarist regime? For the duration of Tsarist autocracy, Russia was considered by far the most rampant of all European nations. Under indispensable law, the despotic Tsar would be the solitary power ruling over all of the Russian empire. Equipped with such an immense power, the ability for an individual Tsar to practice articulate policies and rule efficiently was critical to Russia's survival. Under a coherent and an unwavering leader, one such as Alexander III, Russia had enough demeanor and agility to prosper as a nation. ...read more.

Middle

Such reactions were stimulated partly due to the abrupt halt of the rapid industrialization that was undergone by Russia during the reign of Alexander III. In addition however Nicholas's policies of tsarism and Russification shaped circumstances in which a large number of liberal and nationalistic groups were becoming gradually more aggravated (Tsarist Russia). Regardless of increasing police scrutiny, numerous well established opposition groups formed against the tsarist regime (history.com). In an endeavor to divert interest from domestic revolutions, Nicholas initiated conflict against Japan in 1905. Nicholas's primary aspiration in engaging in such a war was perhaps to merge and amalgamate the Russian public with the tsarist government. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the superficial "October Manifesto" Nicholas II reluctantly permitted the existence of a Duma (history.com). However this was by no means the beginning of the liberalization of the tsarist regime. Nicholas II aggressively restricted any anti-government activity, regardless of the presence of the selected duma. The Russian public had become increasingly motivated and revolts continued (Tsarist Russia ). The economic and social policies introduced by Alexander III were considerably large advances to a successful nation. Subsequent to his assassination and his heir's incompetence, Alexander's policies were not adequate to significantly change the deep rooted tradition of tsardom. The economic growth had offered unlimited opportunities, however a consistent policy of industrialization was required. This Nicholas was not willing to provide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    The Duma lasted just over two months before Nicholas dissolved it for demanding the right to appoint ministers. The next Duma was elected in 1907 and lasted for five months before it too was dissolved. Nicholas then decided to change the voting system so that he would not get any

  2. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

    She did not have much help, as the Tsar was autocratic, and the Duma did not have much power. Another point is that the Tsar may have made the army even worse because he did not respect them. It was mainly made up of peasants, so they may not have been completely loyal because the Tsar treated them very badly.

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    The Populists later developed a terrorist wing, and in 1881 members from the Populist faction 'The People's Will' assassinated Alexander II. Far from increasing the support for the party in this single act the Populists found they had alienated themselves from other opposition groups, and in the following years Populism abruptly decreased.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Source F is reliable because it is a police report, and I know from my historical knowledge that police reports in Tsarist Russia were made to be accurate representations of what was actually happening. This would suggest that what is written in a police report from this time would describe

  1. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    Clearly the Tsar had not learned his lesson in 1905, for which he was to later pay a dear price. During this period, "a renewed outbreak of assassinations and terrorism prompted the Tsar to empower his prime minister, Peter Stolypin, to eliminate the threat to his position once and for all," according to Walsh.

  2. "Alexander III bequeathed Nicholas II a revolution" (Trotsky) Discuss

    Many other reforms that were Alexander II legacy, moreover the Russians hope for freedom, were also eliminated or suppressed .This in turn created a strong opposition which many historians argued, fuelled the revolution in 1917. In the provinces Alexander III sought to counteract what he considered the excessive liberalism of his father's reign.

  1. How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    of the day to day running of Russia was because of the war, however it was Nicholas' fault that this decision was made and this decision was a big factor in his downfall.

  2. How far did the 1905 revolution weaken then Tsarist regime?

    The Tsar made concessions to gain back support, however this made the Tsar look weak and that the tsarist regime was under threat. The October Manifesto, the Tsar allowed the formation of an elected legislative assembly, the Duma. Technically, this would mean that the Tsar had to share his autocratic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work