• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Roosevelt responsible for his election victory in 1932?

Extracts from this document...


2. How far was Roosevelt responsible for his election victory in 1932? In some ways Roosevelt was responsible for his election victory but in some ways he won it simply as people did not want to vote for Hoover, he was disliked at the time. This helped Roosevelt as either way he would have won. However there are two sides to this argument as I will explain. Firstly, many historians believed that people voted for Roosevelt as Hoover was disliked at the time and they didn't want Hoover to win, also Roosevelt's Campaign put a good impression on people. This made it a lot easier for Roosevelt to win the election as many voted for him. Roosevelt was responsible for his election victory in several ways. Roosevelt was a popular governor of New York and carried out very successful policies such as spending state money to solve problems this helped him as people liked what he did and they new what he could do. ...read more.


He was willing to spend money on them. This gained and increased his votes. Roosevelt had new policies that would bring about relief and recovery for the USA population; some historians believe that the Americans were overwhelmed by these policies; in effect the policies appealed to the American public which then led again to more votes for Roosevelt. However, on the other hand other issues were responsible for Roosevelt's election victory. The main point was that he was disliked and 15.8 million voted for him this gave Roosevelt a better chance as he had a lot more than this. Hoover had an inability to deal with the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression, this led to people losing confidence in Hoover therefore this decreased his votes and increased Roosevelt's votes. Hoover tried to help the economy and big businesses as a whole but he failed which led to less votes. Because Hoover was failing so many times and was incapable of doing many things American people didn't want this, they wanted someone who would help them not let them down. ...read more.


Too little too late did act. However it didn't act quick enough to solve American problems. This now made people have less faith in Hoover's government as it didn't follow neither reach its promises. Hoover believed in "rugged individualism". This meant that if you were in trouble you should help yourself and not expect others to help you he had a saying "prosperity is round the corner". Lots of people lost faith in the republicans because of this, they didn't believe in rugged individualism. In comparison Roosevelt and the democrats promised a new deal that aimed to recover the American economy. As you can see either way Roosevelt was going to win the election. Both sides of the argument are explained and show's us clearly that Hoover was responsible and Roosevelt was responsible for the election in 1932. Overall I would say that both Roosevelt and Hoover were to blame for Roosevelt's election in 1932. Because Hoover was disliked this made people want to vote for Roosevelt, however the Americans liked Roosevelt so therefore I think they are both equally to blame for Roosevelt's election. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful?

    Instead of worker committees there would now be single managers in their place and they would be responsible for meeting the factories targets. This allowed the communists to reward the managers who were doing well or punish the ones who weren't.

  2. How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain ...

    The regressive taxation inspired much contempt for the peasants and internal tax barriers restricted growth of industry and trade, leading to the increase in food prices. Niall Ferguson's 'square of power' suggests that when people can see that their money is being spent sensibly they are more tolerant of taxation; this was not the case in France2.


    Explain the different ways in which the short term and long-term causes contributed to causing the great depression. Ans. The great depression was an aftermath of the Wall Street crash on 29th October, 1929. It was a period of recession that greatly affected not only America but also many other countries of the world.

  2. Roosevelt's New Deal

    Normally a photographic source is reliable but it can be argued that it could have been set-up in order to accentuate unemployment amongst the black, who still in the late 1930's were experiencing great racial prejudice. There is a great amount of irony in this photo, since this poster was

  1. Research Project On President Hoover and Roosevelt

    He won with 444 electoral votes and 40 states to 87 electoral votes and 8 states! After World War One, Hoover was involved with helping to provide food to Europe; he was praised for his excellent work both by Europe and United States.

  2. Why did Roosevelt win the 1932 elections?

    Along with the destruction of international trade, businesses too collapsed as they relied a lot on raising money by selling goods or borrowing, which was becoming difficult. The great depression was simply chaos. The public expected the government to help with welfare and financially, above all, look for a resolution to the depression.

  1. Life did get better for many Americans in the 1930s. How far was Roosevelt ...

    Another one of Roosevelt's measures was "The Federal Emergency Relief Administration" which provided $500 million to help the poor in certain States of America. This money paid for Nursery Schools, soup kitchens and small-scale employment schemes, this helped Roosevelt because people would think he is caring and by being kind

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    The interview was given in 2004, thirty-four years after the boycotting and therefore all the facts may not be corroborated by critiques. The facts may therefore have been somewhat hyperbolised, in order to gain attention from the public, and to dramatize the situation so that he gets more appreciation for his work during the time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work