How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain your Answer.

Authors Avatar

How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain your Answer.

The monarchy, referring predominantly to Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were in part responsible for their downfall – the decision of the constitution to abolish the monarchy in 1792. Although as monarchs, Louis and Marie Antoinette made very poor decisions the monarchy’s stability was dubious before they came to power. Louis inherited a country with intrinsic problems, which he did not have the ability to solve.

There is no doubt that the characters of Louis and Marie Antoinette were unsuitable for governing a country and thus contributed to their downfall; however how far can they be blamed for the inherent shortcomings that led to their failure. Louis was pathologically shy and impressionable, not qualities that inspire confidence in a leader. Louis XIV died suddenly without having finished Louis XVI education; he was ill prepared to deal with a country with complex structural problems. France needed a strong and united monarchy to overcome its problems however Louis and Marie Antoinette were neither. Louis and Marie Antoinette were very young when they came to power and neither possessed the traditional qualities of monarchs. Louis was a reluctant leader, who relied heavily on his ministers, ‘Timidity and mistrust of himself were at the centre of his character; and it was soon recognised that, if her were not to be guided by his own inclinations, others could succeed by skill and perseverance in influencing his decisions.’ Although their marriage was intended to secure the relations between France and Austria, Marie Antoinette was subject to great hostility. She was always seen as a foreigner and vicious rumours were circulated. Her reputed frivolous nature and complacency did not improve her popularity. Louis’s inability to control his wife’s expenditure showed him to be lacking in influence both in his marriage and in ruling the state. Louis and Marie Antoinette acted as the entertainment for France as well as the monarchy. The absence of a dauphin was scandalous and Louis’s sexual competence was discussed nationwide, greatly undermining his authority. Louis and Marie Antoinette were not suited to the role of monarchs however the circulated rumours restricted any influence they might have had.

The socio-economic problems of Ancien Regime France were due to its hierarchical structures and the regressive nature of its taxation system. This System had been in place long before Louis’s reign and therefore his influence over it was limited.  The estate system in France was based on the feudal system of medieval Europe. The first and second estates were made up of the nobility and clergyman and the third estate consisted of the peasantry. Despite the third estate having the least money they were heavily burdened with taxation whereas the first and second estates were largely exempt from paying taxes. The regressive taxation inspired much contempt for the peasants and internal tax barriers restricted growth of industry and trade, leading to the increase in food prices. Niall Ferguson’s ‘square of power’ suggests that when people can see that their money is being spent sensibly they are more tolerant of taxation; this was not the case in France. The lack of improvements was largely due to the tax bureaucracy. Privatised tax collection was inept; only half of the tax paid reached the government. Due to the lack of money the government was receiving, a great deal of loans were taken out. The national debt became both chaotic and expensive. With no central bank there was no authority to stabilise debt. Despite a worsening financial state and civil unrest nothing was done, highlighting the incompetence of the French government and Louis’s ineptitude, despite the problems not being directly linked to him

Join now!

The monarchy cannot be held responsible for the deleterious political impact of the enlightenment; however Louis’s attempt at censorship simply exacerbated the situation. The age of enlightenment came about in the 18th century. The inadequacies of Ancien Regime France were blatant and it had become obvious that nothing was being done to resolve these problems.  It was at this time of discontentment scholars began to question the fundamentals of society. As ideas were passed and discussed the movement picked up momentum and soon everybody was questioning things that had previously been accepted. Voltaire, the deist and a philosophe, criticised French ...

This is a preview of the whole essay