• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"How far would you argue that it was clear from the beginning that the league of nations would fail?"

Extracts from this document...


"How far would you argue that it was clear from the beginning that the league of nations would fail?" The league of nations was put up after the Treaty of Versailles in 1920, January 10. Its headquarters were in Geneva. The leagues membership was forty-one in 1919, then fifty by 1924 and sixty by 1934. This league was the idea of the American president of the time Woodrow Wilson, even though they don't join the League. The League of Nations aimed to establish institutions for international diplomacy and arbitration. In this essay I will argue whether it was clear that the league would fail from the beginning. One of the problems that should have made clear that it would be difficult for the League to reach its aims was the fact that it needed as much power as possible and by two of the most powerful countries, America and USSR. ...read more.


These two departments in the League only met up once a year which made the process of complaints and sorting out problems very long and time consuming. They should have known from the beginning that meeting once every year was not enough and should have thought about how to make the League more stronger. The world wide depression hit Japan hard and resulted with most of the population becoming unemployed, so many Japanese people believed that by invading a new area or territory was a way out of this economic disaster. This was reflected when Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931-1941.The Japanese blew up the Japanese railroad to blame China and to use this as an excuse to invade the city of Shenyang. ...read more.


The league condemned Italy and introduced economic sanctions which didn't work and they completed the conquest of Abyssinia in 1936. This lead to Mussolini being annoyed by the sanctions and brought him and Hitler closer, so many small states lost faith in the League so Hitler then broke the Treaty of Versailles. Since 1935 no one took the League of Nations seriously. I believe the League didn't have much determination to solve the problems mainly because the leading countries like France and Britain had many problems of their own to deal with. Britain and France weren't prepared to drop their own interests to uphold collective responsibility. So the Economic Situation the world was in should have made it clear that it would be hard for the League to get things done. Kellan Garib History Essay Harriet Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    Also organising raids against slave owners and traders. It also challenged the railway in Africa were the death rate was 50%. But League pressure brought this down to 4%. This shows the power that the League had (although many a time it did not show it).

  2. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    The other Treaty was The Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928. Its terms were: * The parties... condemn war as a means of solving international disputes and reject it as an instrument of policy. * The settlement or solution of all disputes...


    the island and made the Samians swear an oath of loyalty to Athens. This case was similar to that of Naxos, as Samos had revolted in order to withdraw from the alliance. Athens used her power to force Samos back under her control.

  2. Why did the League of Nations Fail?

    Second, the powerful members of the League, Britain and France, did not think that they could enforce the sanctions. They believed that if they tried to enforce them that Japan would seize Hong Kong and Singapore. The solution that was reached was to set up a commission.

  1. How Far Do You Agree That It Was Clear From The Beginning That The ...

    USA was a growing power and France and Britain were dwindling powers this meant gave the League a bad start, as there was not enough authority and powerful states to uphold the Leagues principles of peace around the world. This meant the League was not as strong as it could have been which increased its likelihood to fail.

  2. AMR essay

    The Korean War was the first time that American and Communist forces had the opportunity to compete.

  1. Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws?

    Without any military force people saw the League as weak and powerless to do any thing about what they were doing. At no point in the League's history did were any troops used by the League. For example, in the Manchurian Crisis the League members just kept using the excuse

  2. Was the ‘Liberal Internationalism’ espoused in 1919 destined to fail or merely a concept ...

    In order to establish the reasons for the success and failure of liberal internationalism it is imperative that the background climate of the period is understood from different perspectives. Norman Angel believed that 'war in advanced capitalist nations would be unprofitable and therefore unthinkable'2 Before 1914, this was definitely true

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work