• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"How far would you argue that it was clear from the beginning that the league of nations would fail?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"How far would you argue that it was clear from the beginning that the league of nations would fail?" The league of nations was put up after the Treaty of Versailles in 1920, January 10. Its headquarters were in Geneva. The leagues membership was forty-one in 1919, then fifty by 1924 and sixty by 1934. This league was the idea of the American president of the time Woodrow Wilson, even though they don't join the League. The League of Nations aimed to establish institutions for international diplomacy and arbitration. In this essay I will argue whether it was clear that the league would fail from the beginning. One of the problems that should have made clear that it would be difficult for the League to reach its aims was the fact that it needed as much power as possible and by two of the most powerful countries, America and USSR. ...read more.

Middle

These two departments in the League only met up once a year which made the process of complaints and sorting out problems very long and time consuming. They should have known from the beginning that meeting once every year was not enough and should have thought about how to make the League more stronger. The world wide depression hit Japan hard and resulted with most of the population becoming unemployed, so many Japanese people believed that by invading a new area or territory was a way out of this economic disaster. This was reflected when Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931-1941.The Japanese blew up the Japanese railroad to blame China and to use this as an excuse to invade the city of Shenyang. ...read more.

Conclusion

The league condemned Italy and introduced economic sanctions which didn't work and they completed the conquest of Abyssinia in 1936. This lead to Mussolini being annoyed by the sanctions and brought him and Hitler closer, so many small states lost faith in the League so Hitler then broke the Treaty of Versailles. Since 1935 no one took the League of Nations seriously. I believe the League didn't have much determination to solve the problems mainly because the leading countries like France and Britain had many problems of their own to deal with. Britain and France weren't prepared to drop their own interests to uphold collective responsibility. So the Economic Situation the world was in should have made it clear that it would be hard for the League to get things done. Kellan Garib History Essay Harriet Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    Also organising raids against slave owners and traders. It also challenged the railway in Africa were the death rate was 50%. But League pressure brought this down to 4%. This shows the power that the League had (although many a time it did not show it).

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    The fatal blow came when the Italian dictator, Mussolini, invaded Abyssinia in 1935. In some ways it was similar to the invasion on Manchuria. The origin of this invasion lead back to 1896. In 1896 Italian troops had tried to invade Abyssinia but had been terribly defeated due to poor equipment and tribesmen.

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    Both cases did not support the original purpose of the Delian League and it is clear that Athens has become much more harsh in her treatment of the allies in pursuit of her own cause. However, Athens could have easily argued that the reason for this treatment was to assure preparation for an attack.

  2. Why did the League of Nations Fail?

    weak with the assembly only meeting once a year and major contries having a veto; the League had no way of enforcing actions with no army. This meant that votes had to be unanimous and this could waste time and every country had to in good times in its own country.

  1. AMR essay

    Having Americans helping the Nationalists very much upset the Communist party, and they ceased peace talks. Then Chaing's army completely disregarded some advice given by General Marshall, whom was later made the Secretary of State. When Marshall became the secretary of state he would not allow America to further heavily involve itself with the Cultural Revolution.

  2. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    This would stop countries from bickering over other countries having their men. It also helped the refugee crisis in turkey in 1922, housing hundreds of thousands of people in refugee camps and quickly stamped out cholera, smallpox and dysentery in the camps.

  1. How Far Do You Agree That It Was Clear From The Beginning That The ...

    USA was a growing power and France and Britain were dwindling powers this meant gave the League a bad start, as there was not enough authority and powerful states to uphold the Leagues principles of peace around the world. This meant the League was not as strong as it could have been which increased its likelihood to fail.

  2. Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws?

    Without any military force people saw the League as weak and powerless to do any thing about what they were doing. At no point in the League's history did were any troops used by the League. For example, in the Manchurian Crisis the League members just kept using the excuse

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work