• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How have perspectives on the meaning of history changed over time?

Extracts from this document...


Sarah Whiteway 14/11/02 How have perspectives on the meaning of history changed over time? Perspectives on the meaning of history have varied greatly overtime. As Keith Jenkins explains in his work, 'Re-thinking History', there are two clear distinctions of history: firstly there is history as a reference to the past events and secondly, history as the records and writings of the past. In recognising that history, 'is a discourse about, but categorically different from, the past', a clearer understanding of what history is may be reached. Additionally, in acknowledging this, one may hope to appreciate the changing perspectives of history over time. These changing perspectives can be attributed to common factors such as changing ideologies, changing experiences and changes in the means of recording history. The Greek historians, among them Herodotus, Thucydides, Polybius and Tacitus, display distinct perspectives of history than that of contemporary historians. That is not to say that their historiography is not useful, for it reflects the understanding of the importance oh history at that time and identifies the evolution and development of historical perspectives over time. This is especially evident in the writings of Herodotus, the 'Father of History' as he acknowledges history as a means of 'presenting the renown of actual deeds', as John Warren explains in History and the Historians. ...read more.


This reflected the Enlightenment belief that history was not simply an account of previous events and their consequences, but rather an investigation into motives, ideas and concepts surrounding these events. Although he denounced Edward Gibbon's historiography, seeing him not as a true respecter of history, but rather a distorter of history in order to fit his own theories, Ranke exemplified that the Enlightenment was not a unified movement but rather a development from previous historical styles. In recognising that the history at the time would not 'instruct men for the profit of future years', but 'merely...show(ed) how, essentially, things happened', it can be seen how Ranke's perspective on history envisaged a more effective approach that had not been fulfilled previously. This recognition marks the beginning of the evolution of modern history, as outlined by the Catholic intellectual Lord Acton in the late 19th Century, claiming that Ranke 'is the representative of the age which instituted the modern study of History. He taught it to be critical, to be colourless, and to be new'. During the 19th Century Karl Marx emerged, determined to change the ideals of his homeland Germany, and much of the world. He was opposed to nationalism, the power of the state and the politics of the elites, and looked upon society in horror at the dominating and growing prospects of industrialisation and capitalism. ...read more.


This perspective recognises the complexity of history and the history of perceiving 'history'. Postmodernism, as the name suggests, surfaced from the end of modernist theory and all that is stood for. This view is not only reflected in postmodernist history but also in art, music and literature. Postmodernism rejected the modernist views, and questioned that history was fundamentally structured by the distortion of history. In recognising that history has been written through the study of other distortions, postmodernist historians not only questioned history but also refused to accept the accuracy and truthfulness of history. This clear opposition is evident in Hayden White's Metahistory, where he writes of his belief that the composition of a historian's work is as much fabrication as it is actuality. This perspective can be seen in George Iggers explanation of White, where he suggests White argues that 'an historical text is in essence nothing more than a literary text, a poetical creation as deeply involved in the imagination as the novel'. Many different perspectives have evolved over time, which reflect the changing attitudes of society and culture. In comparing the contemporary postmodernist view to that of the Greek historians Herodotus and Thucydides, or Christian historians Eusebius and Bede, the transformation of perspectives is most significant. In recognising that interpretations of history have varied greatly in over two thousand years, it is interesting to try to comprehend what history will mean and what it will be perceived as in the following centuries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How would you describe the emergence and meaning of Eurocentrism in relation to European ...

    What reasons did imperialists give for their expansion into the New World, Africa etc? The reasons given were threefold: political, economical and ideological. Stuart Hall discusses these reasons in The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power and uses Spain to illustrate his point: 'Spain for example wanted to get

  2. How and why has the use of the buildings that house the Quay Arts ...

    beers now being offered, but new trends were setting examples; and it had become 'fashionable' to drink not only these new ranges of beers, but to also turn to other alternatives. Fine wines and spirits are an example of these, and with the variety and society now creating a more

  1. Towns Through Time

    It is an official enquiry by the General Board of Health and written by William Ranger; therefore, it must have some reliability. It was also written in the nineteenth century so Ranger would have known exactly what it was like.

  2. How Did the Views and the Arguments put forward by Supporters and opponents of ...

    He is saying that the founding people of America (pioneer stock) had escaped from Europe because of Catholics. On the other hand, Catholics would argue that there is a, 'Freedom of Religion' which is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, and if the Klan claims to be true Americans they

  1. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    seen in his particularity over the origins of certain Latin characters introduced by Claudius. He is even snobbish, for example, in his details of the lineage of Curtius Rufus, who is not noble born. It is these specific details that make Tacitus' narrative different from Thucydides'.

  2. Objective histories.

    The above argument partly depends on the acceptance of Saussure's linguistic theory, which is not necessarily true and which is by no means universally accepted as such by linguists themselves. E.H.Carr in What is History? (1961, p11) argued in opposition to G.R.Elton, that written history is not governed and shaped

  1. Causes and consequences of the English Civil War

    I have saved the best topic for last. Religion was the most important thing to have in that time period. Being an Atheist was unheard of. In England you were either a Catholic or a Protestant.

  2. The History of Bradford. How Undercliffe Cemetery display the values of the Victorians.

    This displays a man who had gone against some ways of how a Victorian had lived, firstly he wasn?t an upper class gentlemen yet he is the one who worked his way to the top. This grave helps me apprehend that not everybody followed all the rules in the Victorian

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work