• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important a reason for the outbreak of revolution in 1917 was Russia's involvement in WWI?

Extracts from this document...


How important a reason for the outbreak of revolution in 1917 was Russia's involvement in WWI? The war lead to Russia seeing a picture of the incompetent tsarist system, unable to provide them the inspiration that they required, and this lead to the first moves which eventually ended in the first bourgeoisie revolution of February 1917. The war abruptly reversed the stabilizing trends of the pre-war period (i.e. the Duma) and totally transformed the political, social and economic situation. In the first place, the war placed a qualitatively new burden of responsibility on the Tsar. It in vested with fateful significance his personal inadequacy and susceptibility to his wife's constant urging that he 'be a man' and assert himself. His decision, in 1915 in defiance of almost universal advice to the contrary, that he would himself take on the supreme command at the front was disastrous, and proved the downfall of the Romanov dynasty; the war was basically the catalyst to the Russian revolutions of 1917. At the beginning of the war, many people were enthusiastic. The only real opponents to Russia entering on France and Britain's side were Lenin and his Bolshevik party, and the government soon arrested them and sent many into exile in other countries. This enthusiasm was also due to the fact that things were looking up on the home front, people were optimistic that the introduction of the 1905 October manifesto would lead to further reform. ...read more.


Huge losses such as those seen at Tannenburg and the Masurian lakes caused huge drops in morale among troops, and the war in Turkey was a substantial factor in the declining conditions on all fronts as Allied supplies could no longer reach Russia. As news of the losses of men and ground reached the home front, there were calls for the removal of inefficient ministers, many of who were merely the lackeys of the Tsar himself. This showed that once the people realized this, there would be an increasing call for the removal of the Tsar, which is eventually what happened. The war lead to the people becoming more and more voiced, and the Duma began to circulate rumours that the Tsar was only prolonging the war for his own purposes. The deciding factor for the Tsar was his own action to try and stem the flow of losses and to try and improve the situation by a very na�ve move of appointing himself as commander-in-chief and going out to the front. Not only had he no experience of this, it also left him as the figure which all the criticism for further losses would be placed on. It was a move on his part which left the country in the hands of the Tsarina and Rasputin, marking the beginning of the very end for the Regime. ...read more.


Rumours that Alexandra was secretly assisting the Germans began to circulate, and some of the Progressive bloc within the Duma began speaking of a coup which would remove the Tsar and his wife. By the start of 1917 the internal situation had become hopeless for the Tsar's government. Rasputin was murdered in December 1916, but this did little to change the attitude of those in power. Some of the governing class hoped that the death of Rasputin would prompt the Tsar to return from the front and the Tsarina to withdraw from public life. Instead, the autocracy stood firm in its convictions and exhibited little concern for the problems facing the country As fuel and food became even scarcer, strikes over took and by February the bourgeoisie movement was beginning the revolutionary process. If it had not been for the war, the revolution would not have occurred. It was the beginning of the end - everything that took place was part of the tsarist regimes downfall. The Tsarina and Rasputin provided intrigue and an unacceptable government for the people of Russia. The Tsars actions on the front, and his leaving of Alexandra and Rasputin left him exorbitantly unpopular and brunt of all the criticism from the actual military side of events. Food shortages caused directly by the war left people desperate and ready to do whatever was needed to get out of the war and rid them of the regime. This all points towards the fact that the war caused the Revolution of early 1917. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    The second paragraph is reliable, as it depicts terrible food shortages, and we know from historical knowledge that this was actually happening in 1916. Source E also shows food shortages, which increases the reliability of both source E and F, as they show the same thing happening around the same

  2. Stalin man or monster

    another, nonetheless in Source F where Bukharin who was also a supporter of Stalin calls Stalin "a narrow minded malicious man." Also the sources reflecting on Stalin's legacies are biased, as they are either by Russia like in source K where everything about Stalin is "brilliant" and is described as a "teacher (and)

  1. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    Tsar Nicholas II came to power in 1894 at the age of twenty six. Nicholas, although he took his responsibilities as Tsar very seriously, knew very little about his people. He relied upon his advisors to inform him on current events instead of finding out himself. Nicholas believed in autocracy.

  2. Stalin's Russia course work What was wrong with Russia before 1917?

    would over throw the middle class (bourgeoisie) and aristocracy. All land property and industry would be taken over and shared equally. Stalin's early life a) Extreme poverty to absolute power b) Georgian- Georgia- southern Russia c) Land of tribalism and blood feuds d)

  1. Events leading to the end of the Tsarist Russia and the 1917 Revolution

    democracy he recently granted, the fact that the majority of the army stayed loyal, and Stolypins mixture of repression and reforms ensure that the threat of revolution subsided and the tsar lived to fight another day, the ideology of revolution remained, but they simply lost their physical presence.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    These sources are written about the influence of Rasputin over the Tsar and Tsarina but whether they actually agree with the first source is what I need to decide. Only source E agrees with Rodzianko's statement but F does also but only to the extent in which it mentions Rasputin going to the Duma with 'petitions'.

  1. Russia's involvement in WW1 was the main reason for the March 1917 revolution - ...

    Russia needed to develop it's industries in order to change from the backward agricultural country into a modern industrialised one and at the same time maintain their important military power. The government invested an enormous amount of money of which a huge percentage came from the Russian people.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Tsar was hugely unpopular due to his weak, hesitant, and reactionary character. He took advice from unreliable individuals such as his wife, Alexandra, and Rasputin. His legislation angered and unsatisfied thousands of workers in Petrograd that led to Bloody Sunday and other protest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work