• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was social suffering in causing the Revolution of 1905?

Extracts from this document...


How important was social suffering in causing the Revolution of 1905? In the years leading up to 1905 there was great discontent amongst the Russian people; this discontent was made clear by the revolution of the people in 1905. The discontent began when Alexander III introduced a series of repressive policies. These policies caused major uproar amongst the Russian people and also caused the Tsar to lose a lot of support. His industrialisation policy did nothing for the needs of the people and just left them as they were before, living in dreadful poverty. Consequently a number of illegal political groups formed in order to oppose the Tsar. The situation in Russia got worse when she suffered a severe stage of depression. Tsar Nicholas II did not bother to help matters. To take the peoples attention away from the problems facing Russia, she began a war with Japan, not expecting to be defeated. Instead of the war taking peoples attention from problems in Russia it added to them. There are mixed views regarding what was responsible for the revolution of 1905, some say the war was to blame, others say the events of bloody Sunday was perhaps 'the final straw' and people also believe that social suffering was the cause of the 1905 revolution. The Russian Tsar was a firm believer in the Tsarist ideology of Autocracy, Orthodoxy and nationality which had been securely established in Russia. ...read more.


Nevertheless Alexander III was a progressive Tsar, introducing the policy of industrialisation. This was established to increase Russia's economic output. This policy however did not help anyone in the urban population of Russia, many of them continued to live in deprivation and poverty. As a result the relationship between the people and the Tsar deteriorated. They blamed the Tsar for their poor working and living conditions. Subsequently they were amenable to the idea of revolution. Therefore the discontent caused by industrialisation was a contributory factor to the 1905 revolution. In a state where Tsarist ideology was in place politics were not really present. In the 19th century where there was much suffering and discontent, various groups opposed to Tsarist ideology came into being. The Social Democrats were established in 1898. Their emphasis was placed on the proletariat as the agents of revolution. However in 1903 they split into two different groups, the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. The Mensheviks were prepared for an evolutionary type of revolution whereas the Bolsheviks felt an educated group of revolutionaries could speed up the process. The Social Revolutionaries were another revolutionary group, formed in 1901. They aimed their ideology at peasants. They believed in a socialist society based on the collective ownership of land, and wanted to work to get benefits for the peasants and the industrial workers. They often used terrorist methods and assassinated key political figures. ...read more.


January the 9th 1805 saw 200,000 people taking part in a demonstration at St Petersburg to present a petition, put together by the Liberals, to the Tsar. The people expected their 'Little Father' to help them during this desperate time. The people were turned away but refused to go resulting in complete and total anarchy in Russia. The strikers were fired at and the death toll was 200. A further 800 were seriously wounded and this day became known as 'Bloody Sunday'. The state of Russia from then onwards was absolute chaos. The revolution of 1905 was brought about by many different reasons. Alexander III took away any freedom the people had following the death of his father. Also the policy of industrialisation did nothing to help the people and made social suffering worse for the people. The economic slump at the beginning of the twentieth century saw the Russian people suffer more. Then Nicholas II ruled Russia. He had no interest in politics whatsoever but believed in autocracy, which no doubt would further add to social suffering of the people. To divert the people's attention away from the problems war was declared on Japan which only made the situation worse as the war was not won. 'Bloody Sunday' was the worst thing the Russian people had to endure as so many people lost their lives due to the careless antics of the ruling Tsar and the Russian military. Therefore social suffering was an important factor in causing the 1905 revolution but other factors also contributed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    Alexander II sought a much more effective system of local government and it was on this area of domestic affairs that many historians believe he made the greatest headway. Poor communication and lack of industrialization, especially inn the far-flung and much poorer provinces of Russia meant that the power and authority of the Tsar was neither known not respected.

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of, Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    Evidence had to be presented orally, whereas previously it had been in writing. There was to be complete equality in the eyes of the law, and as far as possible, uniformity across Russia in the administration of justice. The public exposure of trials made corruption and cover-ups much less common.

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    c) Source E must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Just because this account is an eyewitness one doesn't secure its reliability. There are many things that could make this source unreliable considering the situation of its author.

  2. Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution ...

    totally and utterly incompetent when it came to handling power because he believed in the 300 years of Monarchy. The 1905 "so called" revolution was down to spontaneous demonstrations due to the mishandling of authorities. This "revolution" expressed political discontent questioning the regime and also caused pressure for change.

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Not only was the water a main problem in cities but the living condition inside homes and no only the streets were a great problem . Several health problems had occurred due to this.One of the main factors that contributed to the living conditions was the fact that there were sometimes up to five families living under one roof .

  2. Which of the following factors was the most important in the collapse of Tsarist ...

    As families grew the size of the plots that were on offer also shrunk and so life was very hard and it was often difficult to grow as much food as was needed. Nearly half of all children died before they were five and the maximum life expectancy was only fifty years old.

  1. How far do you agree that the 1905 revolution was a revolution without revolutionaries?

    In 1894 Nicholas became Tsar, he was determined to rule as harshly as his father did, but his character was weak, and incompetent. He did not posses the qualities needed to lead Russia through such Turmoil of revolutionary acts, and many revolutionaries saw this as an opportunity to act.

  2. In spite of the Czar's decrees and declarations, Russia, by the beginning of the ...

    He was still convinced he could handle Russia himself. By 1902, the peasants had revolted against Witte's industrialization movements, which were marked by a raise in taxes as Russia spent more than it ever had. Russia was struggling in the European and Asian markets, and with much domestic unrest, Nicholas II did not want foreign affairs muddled as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work