• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the fear of socialism in explaining the rise to power of the Nazis in Germany between 1919 and 1933?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was the fear of socialism in explaining the rise to power of the Nazis in Germany between 1919 and 1933? By the end of 1918 it was clear that the axis powers had lost the Great War. The German people were demoralised and hungry. The nationalistic fervour with which they had greeted the start of the war had gradually evaporated - replaced by a desire for (fair) peace with the Allies. Kaiser Wilhelm II, who had led his people into the debacle, was forced to abdicate. A Republic was declared on the 9th of November and an armistice shortly followed. A democratic constitution was signed in the city of Weimar, which leant its name to the new republic. The nationalist and bourgeois elements in Germany, some still hankering after the return of the Empire under the Kaiser, critically supported the new SPD (Socialist) led Government. They, and majority of the German people, wanted the guarantee of a fair and reasonable peace with the Allies. The government also gave an assurance that the revolution would go no further i.e. that it would not take a revolutionary socialist character. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 had sent shockwaves through the European ruling class. All over Europe, the barbarism of the 'Great War' had radicalised society. ...read more.

Middle

The Treaty of Versailles was not the outcome they had hoped for. As discussed previously, it contained clauses that many Germans deemed intolerable. Support for the government, and by extension the whole system of Weimar democracy, was undermined. In the first election after the Treaty had been signed, parties who supported the Republic lost votes and the parties who opposed it gained votes. The goal of almost all democratic German politicians, most effectively Stresemann, was to ameliorate Versailles. For authoritarian nationalist elements, such as the DNVP and later the Nazis, Versailles and reparation payments were untenable and only its repudiation and the destruction of the republic which fostered it would do. The Treaty itself was harsh - but no more so than the Brest-Litovsk treaty which the Imperial government had offered Soviet Russia. Also, there is no doubt that the German politicians who signed the treaty would have had reservations but what exactly where their options? Signing the treaty or face an occupation of Germany by the allies? Still, this message did not get through to most Germans. The Nazis would obtain support from the patriotic protestant middle class for their opposition to Versailles, as well as Veterans and soldiers - many of who lost their jobs because of restrictions on the size of the German army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most Nazi support came from the middle classes who had been ravaged by the economic collapse in 1924. They also won some support from farmers and people in the rural areas. Hitler, like any arch demagogue, could fit his rhetoric to the audience. In Berlin he would talk of his disdain for "exploitative capitalism", when talking to his industrialist backers his "anti-Communism" would come to the fore. In reality, Hitler had no social or economic plans. His only real goal was complete personal authority. Any propaganda issued was a means to this end. To conclude, "fear of socialism" did produce some support for the Nazi movement, particularly in the "elites" of German society. Most Nazi support however, came from their ability to capitalize on the weaknesses of Weimar democracy, such as its association with the Treaty of Versailles. The Great Depression gave the Nazis the opportunity to offer themselves as the solution to the terrible unemployment and poverty it caused. The cult of the individual around Hitler, coupled with Nazi nationalism and anti-Semitism made them appealing to sections of the German population who had grown weary of the Republic and desired a new "strong man" to lead Germany. What is clear is that the collapse of Weimar democracy and its replacement with a Nazi totalitarian state was a disaster for all Europe, no more so than Germany itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far do you agree that the fear of communism was the main reason ...

    And this led to the Weimar being weak from the start as they were always going to be blamed for the signing of the treaty. Even though the great depression was the main blame for the failing, it is clear that Hitler would no doubt ably of found another angle to attack the Weimar.

  2. How Important Was Hitler's Contribution to the Nazis' rise to Power by 1933?

    People began to realise the Weimar Government was not working so they started to look for a party who had radical solutions to their problems and they decided to rejoin the extreme parties. As more and more people became unemployed the more and more popular that the Nazis came.

  1. "Only the Great Depression put the wind into Hitler's sails" (A.J.P. Taylor) Do you ...

    (a World War I hero), whom he expected the troops to follow, ready to assist in the rebellion. On 9th November he planned to storm the meeting in the Munich Beer Garden and force the three leaders to carry through their original plan. Through violence, (Hitler held them at gunpoint)

  2. The economic depression was the most important factor in Hitler's rise to power, discuss.

    Therefore, even though the budget did in the long term help the economy, it was very damaging as it increased Hitler's support. The failure of the Government to remain strong and appoint a leader who did not have to rule by decree because of lack of support was vital in Hitler's becoming Chancellor.

  1. Did Nazi rule in Germany result in a social revolution.

    The Germans were the higher race, destined for a glorious evolutionary future. For this reason it was essential that the Jews should be segregated, otherwise mixed marriages would take place. Were this to happen, all nature's efforts "to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being may thus be rendered futile" (Mein Kampf).

  2. Life under the Nazis - who was better and worse off.

    This is so as the farms still remained well-organized, as if the land kept being split up amongst the children, it would become more unproductive. The people who thrived the most during the Nazi reign were the big businesses and the middle classes.

  1. To what extent did the Nazis achieve an economic miracle in Germany between 1933-1939?

    of fats and meat, and the rearmament requirement for raw materials, especially lead and copper. Schacht was officially replaced in 1937 after failing to find a solution to the financial crisis. Hitler appointed Goering as Plenipotentiary of the Four Year plan because he would be more compliant with Hitler's policies.

  2. Between 1933 and 1945 Hitler and the Nazi Part were successful in their creation ...

    them remained faithful to the church, seeing the church as an alternative focus from the Nazi regime. In fact by 1935, the Catholic Church organisational structure remained intact, and only 5% of the whole German population were involved in the German Faith movement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work