• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen Plan?

Extracts from this document...


26th September 2003 Ewan Miller Y2 How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen Plan? Introduction: The Role of the British Expeditionary Force (the B.E.F.) was an in important contributing factor to the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, but not the only one. The French's Plan XIV, the out of date Schlieffen plan itself, and the role of the Belgian army all were contributing factors that together resulted in the failure of Germany's Schlieffen Plan. The Background: Germany had anticipated war for a long time, and in 1905 the German Chief of Staff, Alfred von Schlieffen devised a short, decisive plan to win it. The biggest problem with Germany's location was that it was in between France and Germany. In a European war, the Germans knew they could not, and so would have to avoid, dividing their forces and fighting a war on two fronts. Consequently, von Schlieffen's plan counted on Russia's inability to mobilise - he estimated it would take them 6 weeks to do so. Thus, to avoid a war on two fronts, the Schlieffen Plan meant 90% of the German army would cross rapidly through neutral Belgium, and like a scythe advance through northern France past the French army and fortifications on the French/German border, and take Paris and the French army from behind. After France's defeat, the German army could march back through Germany to fight Russia. With France gone, von Schlieffen thought the Russians would be both terrified and their morale would be down, and that Russia would be easily crushed. ...read more.


French ordered his five divisions to make defences at the nearby Mons canal. This bought the BEF one day before conflict with the German First army. When the German army, under von Kluck, reached Mons, he ordered a massive offensive through the woods. The British's fantastic marksmanship with rifles led the Germans to believe they were facing machine guns, and after the offensive, von Kluck had achieved nothing. But the BEF had achieved in holding up the German army, and giving the French army time to move and protect Paris. But the BEF could not halt the entire German advance - only the French army could do that, with the French armies retreating, and knowing that the BEF would have to do the same, or face the whole German army on their own, Sir French ordered a retreat. Von Kluck didn't give chase, but instead concentrated on the casualties he had sustained, though ultimately he killed 8,000 of the BEF's rear guard. Sir John French himself recommended to Kitchener, the British War Minister, that the BEF make a full withdrawal to the coast. Kitchener, however, rejected the suggestion and the BEF retreated to meet the French at the Marne. The Battle of the Marne The battle at Marne was one of the most decisive battles in The First World war, not because it resulted in the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, but because it ended in stalemate. The First battle of the Marne was between 6-12th September 1914. ...read more.


The Russians' early mobilisation left the German right flank unprotected, and because of this, when the Germans changed their plan and instead of going around to the west of Paris, they attacked it from the east, where they faced the French army and the BEF they were beaten. The Schlieffen plan ran war on a timetable. If something changed, the rest of the plan would go wrong. The Schlieffen Plan was flawed even when it wasn't out of date 9 years before. It gambled on factors it had no control over, like the BEF. Instead of asking how the plan could fail, maybe we should be asking how could it have worked? The Belgians and BEF slowed the Germans, the early Russian mobilisation weakened them. The French and BEF beat them. All the causes were linked together. The role of the BEF was a very important factor in the failure of the Schlieffen plan for two main reasons. Firstly, the Schlieffen plan had not counted on meeting the BEF at all, and their morale decreased after facing such well trained troops, and the fact that the BEF gave the French army time to stop the German army at Marne. If the BEF weren't there, the Germans, regardless of whether they marched around to the west or straight to the east of Paris, could have taken both it and the French army from behind resulting in the overall success of the Schlieffen plan. In the end, the Schlieffen plan really did fail. It ended up with exactly the opposite it had intended. It ended up with a stalemate and leaving Germany fighting a war on both sides which it would eventually lose. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Schlieffen Plan fail?

    Some other historians may say that the Germans should have gone through the Netherlands as well as Belgium to get to France faster. Moltke, however, quite rightly saw no real reason to add the Netherlands to Germany's growing list of enemies.

  2. The Failure Of The Schlieffen Plan

    The decision to not go around Paris was fatal as this gave the French army another chance to defend their country. The reason for not going round Paris was because the Germans were running out of supplies this is also a mistake by the high commandment, Finally the Russians mobility was another killer for the Germans.

  1. Explain How The Schlieffen Plan Was Meant To Work

    Russia had mobilised much sooner than the Germans had hoped for. Germany had to move 100,000 of its troops from the western to the eastern front. This weakened the German advance even more in the west. Trains were scheduled to take hauls of German troops back to Germany in order to fight the oncoming Russians.

  2. The Schlieffen plan was a war winning plan that if worked would have properly ...

    quicker way of getting to Paris which meant if something held them back they would have had time to get back in time. Once the Germans had got to Mons they had another shock they were met by skilful but outnumbered British army.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    were useless, as they did not explode or jammed, and all it did was to make the enemy aware of you upcoming presence and allow them time to prepare an adequate defence. New Rapid Recoil Artillery were advanced in that they did not have to be repositioned after every shot but were slow to move when they were transported.

  2. A stalemate developed on the Western Front as a result of the failure of ...

    The French 'Plan 17' failed. The plan was to swiftly attack Germany, defeat them and win back Alsace-Lorraine. However, the French could not get through the German defences at Alsace-Lorraine and many French troops were lost.

  1. The Failure of the Schlieffen Plan - How it was meant to happen.

    * Von Moltke lacked the nerve to take all the troops he needed form the army in Alsace-Lorraine to hold back to eastern front. * Moltke and the German Generals made a fatal mistake. Instead of going west to surround Paris as planned, the 1st army led by General von Kluck went east of Paris towards the Marne.

  2. Was Belgian resistance the main cause of the failure of the Schlieffen Plan?

    Furthermore, it is known that the Germans were believed to have won the battle of Mons, meaning that it may not have been much of a resistance to their advance. Moreover, the fact that Russia mobilised the army much faster than the Germans initially envisioned meant that Germany had to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work