• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important Were The Following In Causing The Second WorldWar? Hitler's foreign policy and Appeasement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Important Were The Following In Causing The Second World War? * Hitler's foreign policy * Appeasement ' We have peace for our time' Chamberlain, 30 December 1938 This quote if from Chamberlain after he had again appeased Hitler and given into his demands of the Sudentland. Yet at the same time he was building up his armies for a likely war and therefore his words are very deceptive. It is in analyzing the two main causes of the Second World War that we can understand how important Hitler policy and appeasement were in sparking off the war. Hitler's main aims in his foreign policy were to reverse the decisions of the Treaty of Versailles which he believed was unfair, to re-arm Germany, to unite all German-speaking people, to create living space (lebensraum) and to defeat Communism or Bolshevism. Looking at these aims, many of these arguably express a sense of war. Firstly, the aims were forbidden according to the Treaty Of Versailles. This meant that for Hitler to gain back everything his country had lost from the Treaty and create living space, he would have to invade other countries, which could easily escalate into a war. ...read more.

Middle

Even so, it later became apparent that the only way to defeat Hitler's policy was to wage a war against him, which many did not want. Hitler's foreign policy become even more of a cause when he begins to achieve them. For instance, insisting on taking the Sudetenland showed that he was willing to fight Czechoslovakia. When instead all of Czechoslovakia was invaded and this nearly resulted in a war, it showed that Hitler's aims were uncontrollable and irrational because Czechoslovakia is not a German speaking country. Another example is the Anschluss with Austria, which seemed to be forced by Hitler who used his troops to ensure that the people voted for an Anschluss. This further showed that Hitler was intent on achieving his aims and would resort to war if possible. Mainly Britain but other countries responded to Hitler's aims by appeasing him. This meant they would accept Hitler's aims if they seemed reasonable and fair in order to prevent war occurring. One of the main aspects of Hitler's policy where this can be seen is when they agree that Hitler can take part of the Sudentland. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the end therefore it seems more likely that appeasement contributed more to the Second World War than Hitler's foreign policy. Even though both causes are linked because appeasement is the response given to his policy, Britain and other countries did not anticipate Hitler's unreasonable demands until it was too late. This was revealed when he insisted upon having all of the Sudentland. Arguably Britain and France only realized the full extend of Hitler's policy when they were forced to go to war over the invasion of Poland. If Britain and France had stopped Hitler when he re-militarized the Rhineland and easily defeated his armies, they would have probably prevented him from increasing his demands and thus have prevented World War Two. Therefore, Hitler's aims were inevitable since he believed that Germany was treated unfairly by the Treaty of Versailles. So even though Hitler's aims were a main cause, the key to preventing him achieving this aims was not solely due to appeasement because this only made Hilter's demands worse and delayed the war, not stop it. Jahanara Abedin 10A 17th January 2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Was appeasement a mistake?

    It got quite a lot of different supplies form Austria, such as soldiers, gold and iron. Then for Czechoslovakia it gained coal and military hardware factories. This made Germany's defences stronger as well; it gave them more power to take places over and to defend their own country.

  2. Was the policy of appeasement the most important reason for the outbreak of the ...

    Also, it was "a league of some nations" which meant that some of the most important nations were absent such as the USSR who joined quite late and the USA who would have strongly helped the League as Woodrow Wilson invented the idea of a peace keeping body.

  1. Was Appeasement A Mistake?

    The prime minister Neville Chamberlin said, "When I think of those four terrible years [the First World War], and I think of the seven million young men who were killed, the thirteen million who were maimed and mutilated, I feel it was my duty to strain every nerve to avoid a repetition of the First World War" (Source 7.)

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    Basically appeasement is seen as a sign of weakness in the opponent's eyes. Though the situation was hard, neither Britain nor France stood up once for another country. They believed in too much. They trusted a man with and evil mind.

  1. How did Appeasement lead to the outbreak of the Second World War ? The ...

    Up to that point they had been the worst of enemies. This was a very rare event for the two countries which took Britain and France to surprise. Britain had hoped that Russia would fight against Germany for Poland but now they were signing a pact!

  2. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    (Evidence needed here) The system of collective security, which was in part demanded by the British Public, came in the form of The League Of Nations. This was to be a system in which international disputes between nations would be settled by negotiation.

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    The British people and Chamberlain strongly believed in the policy of appeasement and were shocked when it did not work. Chamberlain had total faith in the policy of appeasement and believed that eventually Hitler could be controlled. As Chamberlain said in 1939 at the outbreak of World War 2 "Everything

  2. Overview of Appeasement and Hitler's Foreign Policy (Causes of World War II)

    Britain and France (and Italy in this case), however did not take any significant action. Both denounced Hitler's announcement, and threatened to take action against further disturbances to the status quo (the stresa front), but such talk did not put down Hitler.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work