• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Reliable is Schindler's List As A Representation of the Holocaust?

Extracts from this document...


How reliable is Schindler's List as a representation of the Holocaust/Final Solution? Schindler's List is a blockbuster movie based on Thomas Keneally's book, 'Schindler's Ark', which is based on 50 eye witness accounts of the Holocaust. The movie is based around the life of Oskar Schindler, a rich German business man (who is by no means a flawless hero) who risks everything in a bid to save as many lives as possible nearing the end of the Holocaust. Steven Spielberg, a well known Hollywood director, made this movie and tried to keep it as close to the book as possible. He liked the idea of this book as Keneally kept it as close to fact as possible so as he wouldn't debase the original event, but it drew people in emotionally because it was told from an eye witness point of view. Spielberg made this movie to inform people about the Holocaust, but also to make money, so he threw in a mix of fact and fiction, which is why we need to explore this further. We can tell from the film what is fact reasonably easily because of our thorough knowledge of the Holocaust already, and also our source pack is useful here. We are shown how the Jews are treated in great detail in this movie, beginning with them being herded into ghettoes to live, and the conditions in the ghettoes are shown to be appalling. ...read more.


The prisoners did not receive proper nourishment, which is again shown by Turkel, and we know that their 'water was contaminated' (14A, SS officer). The contrast between the conditions for the Nazis and the Jews' living quarters is shown well in the film. We see that Schindler is forever bringing gifts of exotic fruit and cigarettes, luxuries reserved for the rich at that time. There are plenty of parties right next to the camp in Goeth's residence, and Schindler sneaks food to Stein (his Jewish right hand man who has been taken into Goeth's camp) from one of these parties. This underlines the significant difference in the conditions and this is backed up by source 14A. Steven Spielberg's handling of the movie also made it such a good portrayal of the Holocaust. Spielberg claimed that he had 'hungered' to make this movie, but there was a ten year gap between his realization that he wanted to do this and the actual beginning of creating the movie. I believe that this was a good thing, and did indeed help him to make this a better portrayal. The ten year delay meant that he was mature enough to deal with the task and also meant that he knew the characters very well and was able to convey this to the actors involved. ...read more.


responsible movie maker, it was his duty to keep the violence to a minimum, especially at that time, but there are some quite graphic scenes of violence in the film, even if they have been underplayed. In conclusion, I believe that Schindler's List was a reasonably reliable representation of the Holocaust. I believe this because nearly everything that was included in the movie that happened to the Jews can be backed up by our sources and our own knowledge, and the fact that all eye witness accounts included in Keneally's book were consistent. Keneally's critically acclaimed book wanted to stay as close to the facts as possible, as did Spielberg with his film. The fact that Spielberg spent ten years researching the Holocaust and Schindler's Jews means that the movie was going to be very accurate and therefore very reliable. He doesn't portray Schindler as a saint, or show all Jews to be victims, which means that he keeps it very close to the real life situation, as Schindler was a womanizer and had a drinking problem and some Jews actually made money out of the war. Even though he doesn't show what other, non-Jewish people went through, I still believe that the movie was quite reliable, but it is still important to keep reminding ourselves that it isn't a documentary and Steven Spielberg isn't a historian. History Coursework Caoimhe McWilliams Question 3 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Gallipoli movie essay

    between infantry and Lighthorse their bond was obvious by their expressions, words and actions. What impression do you get of the conditions in the beach area? It's a war zone, the men are constantly exposed and in the line of fire.

  2. The Holocaust

    It was in March, 1933, that Nazis made heir first political attack on some minorities. The first nationwide act of discrimination against the entire German-Jewish community was an organized boycott of Jewish, shops, businesses and professional people. Hitler ordered the boycott to begin on the 1st of April 1933.

  1. Rwanda vs Holocaust

    Over 800,000 Rwandans were killed and many fled to neighboring countries like Burundi, Tanzania and Uganda. This was different to the Jewish Holocaust although something that is the same is that they had to wear things that made them stand out from the other ethnic group, in this case the

  2. Olympics More Than Just A Sport

    It is said that Hitler stated "The Americans should be ashamed of themselves, letting Negros win their Medals for them. I shall not shake hands with a Negro... Do you really think that I will allow myself to be photographed with a Negro!?"

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    and not to go too far so that he would not taste the bitterness of the whip too early in his life. Samuel's short childhood was a happy one; he played with other slave children not knowing he was a slave.

  2. What Was The Nature & Purpose of the Holocaust?

    This was solid proof that official government policy was to take away their basic rights. The anti-semitism was spread and enhanced through propaganda. Goebbels' propaganda forced anti-Jewish messages upon German families. They were often refused jobs and humiliated publicly as a result of this.

  1. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    Friel and McGuinness witnessed this change in the representation of Irish history, Making History, itself, demonstrates the type of historical writing O'Brien objected to. Making History and Translations demonstrate the contradictory nature of Irish History. Hugh O'Neill is first introduced as one comfortable with the propriety of the English court;

  2. How reliable is the photograph as a historical source?

    So can we say that in those days at least, the photograph was a reliable historical source? Possibly, if the origins of the photograph can be verified and where there would seem to be no gain from dissimulation. Books such as A Victorian Eyewitness bear testimony to the value of preserving images which would otherwise be lost forever.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work