• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, use source E and F and your own knowledge to support your answer.Both source E and F are from a newspaper article explaining the events of Kristallnacht.

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, use source E and F and your own knowledge to support your answer. Both source E and F are from a newspaper article explaining the events of Kristallnacht. Source E is an article from a British newspaper called the News Chronicle it was produced on the 11th November 1938. The title of the article read POGROM RAGES THROUGH GERMANY INCENIDIARY MOBS WRECK SHOPS SYNAGOGUES. Source F was also written on the 11th November 1938 but is an American newspaper that has produced the article called the New York Times. Both sources have similar views on the events on Kristallnacht but are they important to a historian? The attack on Jews started in November 1938. this was a result of a Nazi German embassy staff, Ernst Von Rath, being shot by a Jewish refugee named Hershel Grynspan. Source E tells us about Kristallnacht the facts in source E has some accurate details as it was the 15th anniversary of the Munich putsch we also know that during Kristallnacht shop windows were broken and the contents of the shop was stolen also that Jewish synagogues were set on fire. ...read more.


Source F is an American article from the New York Times and was published on the same date. The story also has violent language like "perish Jewry!" and "kill the Jews!". Comparing both sources, they have different details of what went on as in source F is says that the Jews were untouched but in source E it says "Jews were chased through the streets". The possible reason why source F is different is because it is from an American newspaper and therefore from an American point of view. Source F shows that there were wrecking squads and lots of destruction this backs up source E's points. On the other hand source E is not fully reliable as it is emphasising the fact that lots of German people took part in the riots, when actually most people stayed out of the way. It mentions that the crowds were apathetic. Source E also says that the riots started when, storm troopers and the Hitler youth, who were celebrating Hitler's 15th anniversary of the Munich putsch, started to get out of control and started to destroy buildings. ...read more.


Source F in the other hand talks about destruction all over the country however source F was published by an American newspaper therefore expressing the views and opinions of the people there and not the actual facts. I have found that source E is reliable to a certain extent as it has some facts that agree with source F but it is only reliable for one part of Germany. Source E is also only reliable for a British newspaper as the language may have been exaggerated to sell stories. Therefore Source E is not useful to a historian for facts of Kristallnacht but it is useful for the opinions of a socialist Britain on a Nazi Germany. Also Britain didn't like Hitler's foreign policy aims this could be why the source was bias. This source is not trust worthy for historians to use about the details of the events as some facts were grossly over exaggerated. The language was exaggerated just to sell the story, it also doesn't match source F and the amount of violence that went on during the night of Kristallnacht. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Source I is from a history book in 1974. This means the facts written down are probably historians making their own judgment of the sources they had. Source I clearly states that it's impossible to set a fire in a building that big on his own. Also, Lubbe was mentally and physically handicapped.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    it was caused purely be the German public in "'spontaneous wave of anger, as a result of the cowardly murder of von Roth...'". The source then challenges the Nazi argument by stating that when looking at the destruction and violent actions, "all of the local crowds were obviously horrified by the Nazis' acts".

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Buffman also clearly completely opposes the acts when he claims that; 'The slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public caused fury among the Nazis'. Buffman is suggesting in this source that Kristallnacht was planned, but the Nazis' are pretending it is spontaneous, which he conveys by claiming that the troops were 'not in uniform'.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    It's basically Goering's word against Halder's, and neither have any proof. When comparing Source F with Source G, Goering says that he didn't set fire to the building, but he doesn't say that he didn't help plan it. Source G may well be telling the truth, and Goering may well

  1. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    She is presented as entirely innocent, in the midst of all the corruption enveloping her, and in this way, the source is depicting the Germans as being blameless in the current situation. Instead, it is shown to be the Nazis who are responsible for the destruction, as demonstrated by the Nazi in the picture with a dead body beneath him.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    It also says that Frau Troost's husband was Hitler's favourite architect and so Frau Troost obviously, greatly benefited financially as her husband was his favourite architect so she may be trying to justify and divert the blame from Hitler. Source 'I' does not agree with source ' H' at all

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    The fact that it is sent to the British Consul, I think, is a cry for help because the Nazis are treating the Jews appallingly and something needs to be done about it Overall, I think that Source D and Source E make it more likely that the account given

  2. Why did kristallnacht take place?

    them with weaponry also that a list of Jewish names and addresses were provided. Also source C was signed "a civil servant" so it is anonymous so that the truth cannot come back to him, and he could stay safe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work