• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, use source E and F and your own knowledge to support your answer.Both source E and F are from a newspaper article explaining the events of Kristallnacht.

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, use source E and F and your own knowledge to support your answer. Both source E and F are from a newspaper article explaining the events of Kristallnacht. Source E is an article from a British newspaper called the News Chronicle it was produced on the 11th November 1938. The title of the article read POGROM RAGES THROUGH GERMANY INCENIDIARY MOBS WRECK SHOPS SYNAGOGUES. Source F was also written on the 11th November 1938 but is an American newspaper that has produced the article called the New York Times. Both sources have similar views on the events on Kristallnacht but are they important to a historian? The attack on Jews started in November 1938. this was a result of a Nazi German embassy staff, Ernst Von Rath, being shot by a Jewish refugee named Hershel Grynspan. Source E tells us about Kristallnacht the facts in source E has some accurate details as it was the 15th anniversary of the Munich putsch we also know that during Kristallnacht shop windows were broken and the contents of the shop was stolen also that Jewish synagogues were set on fire. ...read more.


Source F is an American article from the New York Times and was published on the same date. The story also has violent language like "perish Jewry!" and "kill the Jews!". Comparing both sources, they have different details of what went on as in source F is says that the Jews were untouched but in source E it says "Jews were chased through the streets". The possible reason why source F is different is because it is from an American newspaper and therefore from an American point of view. Source F shows that there were wrecking squads and lots of destruction this backs up source E's points. On the other hand source E is not fully reliable as it is emphasising the fact that lots of German people took part in the riots, when actually most people stayed out of the way. It mentions that the crowds were apathetic. Source E also says that the riots started when, storm troopers and the Hitler youth, who were celebrating Hitler's 15th anniversary of the Munich putsch, started to get out of control and started to destroy buildings. ...read more.


Source F in the other hand talks about destruction all over the country however source F was published by an American newspaper therefore expressing the views and opinions of the people there and not the actual facts. I have found that source E is reliable to a certain extent as it has some facts that agree with source F but it is only reliable for one part of Germany. Source E is also only reliable for a British newspaper as the language may have been exaggerated to sell stories. Therefore Source E is not useful to a historian for facts of Kristallnacht but it is useful for the opinions of a socialist Britain on a Nazi Germany. Also Britain didn't like Hitler's foreign policy aims this could be why the source was bias. This source is not trust worthy for historians to use about the details of the events as some facts were grossly over exaggerated. The language was exaggerated just to sell the story, it also doesn't match source F and the amount of violence that went on during the night of Kristallnacht. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    It states that 'It is established beyond any doubt that, given the brief time available to Lubbe, it would have been impossible for any one man to set the building alight on this scale'. It goes on to say 'let alone a man without knowledge of the place, and seriously handicapped, both mentally and physically, as Lubbe undoubtedly was'.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Also, it is possible that Goering might have been purposely blaming Goebbels, because of the on-going conflict between them as they fought for Hitler's attention. Source I, too, has its limitations. It is a secondary source, and since the interview with Troost was carried out in 1971, long after the war, one has to question the reliability of her memory.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Obviously, the Nazis had already thought of expelling the communists by exploiting the Reichstag Fire situation. Source E was Franz Halder hearing Goering's own words. Goering said, "The only one who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it."

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    This supports his original opinion that this was not a spontaneous attack, as the SS men and Stormtroopers had already 'been provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs' before it even started. The source is completely challenging the Nazis', making them out to look immoral and corrupt.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Study Sources F and G. How similar are the messages of these two cartoons? Explain your answer with reference to the detail in the cartoons. Both of the sources, source F and source G, are cartoons on 'Kristallnacht' which were both published after the event.

  2. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    There is no need to lie in this source so it shows the truth and is reliable. It shows the build-up to Kristallnacht and therefore supports source C. However, it doesn't mention the SA. Source E tells us that this is the "true report" on Kristallnacht.

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    How useful are Sources F, G and H in explaining the reactions of Germans to the 'Final Solution' ? (5) Study Sources I and J. In what ways do these sources contradict or support the view that ordinary Germans knew about and supported the "Final Solution"?

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Question Two Source C gives the impression that the Nazis were responsible for Kristallnacht but they tried to make it looks as though it was caused by the public in a "spontaneous wave of anger". It begins by describing the account as expressed by the Nazi press who claim that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work