• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for many year and managed to survive a revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for many year and managed to survive a revolution, these are some of the reasons that people argue he was in a secure position of control, however his downfall questions this believe, as does the many strikes and problems he suffered. To understand exactly how secure Nicholas was many events and facts must be analysed. Nicholas himself was a deeply religious man, it was clear that the most important thing to him was his family. When he was made Tsar he was the first to admit that he wasn't ready to take on the position. This clearly shows that he wasn't in a secure position from the start of his reign. He was also described as a very untrustworthy man and he changed his mind a lot. An example of this was when he went back on his word about the Dumas and limited their powers, this is explained further below. ...read more.

Middle

This led to their surrender in 1905. With news of the surrender the already unhappy people of Russia felt humiliated, especially due to the fact that Japan was an inferior country. The war was an inevitable cause of the 1905 revolution and the incompetence of the government was not forgotten, this meant that even 9 years later the position of Nicholas was not totally secure. It could be argued that the 1905 revolution was the main event which hindered the position of the Tsar by 1914. This is because his own people stood against him and were clearly unhappy with him in power. It also led to the Dumas which was a parliament given to Nicholas' opposition groups. However the 1905 revolution was not a complete failure because Nicholas managed to maintain all of his powers and came out of it in a secure position. Also the people of Russia were shown that the government was strong; this was because they had the support the army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall the Dumas made Nicholas more secure in the short term when the first started in 1905; however once they became ''an ineffectual body'' by 1914 the position of Nicholas was extremely vulnerable because there was a lack of support but huge amount of strikes. To conclude the position of Nicholas II was made stronger by 1914 in some respects due to him coming out strong of the 1905 revolution, having control of the Dumas and improvements to the country through industrialisation with Witte's reforms. However all of these things in some ways also hindered Nicholas' position because the revolution showed that people were against him, the Dumas led to a huge amount of strikes by 1914 and Witte's reforms led to the 1905 rise against him. Also Nicholas' untrustworthy personality and surrender in the Russo-Japanese war led to him being hugely unpopular. Therefore Nicholas' position was not secure in 1914 however it wasn't completely vulnerable because a revolution did not take place in Russia for another 3 years. Elizabeth Lund 11MD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    The Duma lasted just over two months before Nicholas dissolved it for demanding the right to appoint ministers. The next Duma was elected in 1907 and lasted for five months before it too was dissolved. Nicholas then decided to change the voting system so that he would not get any

  2. How and why did the tsar nicholas II survive the 1905 revolution?

    Even though the mutiny is contained, this is yet another public relations disaster and Vakulenchuk becomes a Bolshevik hero, aggravating those who were against the Tsar, to become even more bitterly against him. Inevitably, people already in opposition with the Tsar continued to grow in anger, whilst the killing of

  1. Why did Nicholas II survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of 1917?

    This meant that not only were the majority of the army unwilling, they were also disloyal to the Tsar, as most had come from the factories where socialism was growing and there was great dissatisfaction with the autocracy. For these men, the shooting of 40 striking workers on 11th March

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Or discontent fuelled by the horrors of a war yet to come."4 The peasants were still unhappy, as no serious attempt was made to share out land, regardless of Stolypin's reforms. The Tzar began to break the promises he made in the October Manifesto.

  1. How secure was the Tsar's powers up to 1904?

    Therefore workers again found them selves outside society and with no alternative but to support revolutionaries.

  2. Describe how events in Russia1914-17 led to the downfall of the Tsar Nicholas II

    Hoping reform would come from above. In reaction, guards fired into the unarmed crowd; when news of one hundred dead and hundreds more wounded escaped, public opinion almost universally turned against the old regime. People believed it was the Tsar who gave the orders and the "Little Father" image was completely destroyed.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Despite the way the workers were treated, Stalin still managed to industrialise Russia from the low economy it was, this made Stalin look like a great man. Stalin used monstrous acts to industrialise Russia and take control of the Soviet Union.

  2. "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree ...

    The Tsar bought over the peasants by the November Manifesto in which he pledged to progressively reduce and then abolish the mortgage repayments of their lands. Economic reforms were carried out by Stolypin to try and improve the peasants' living standards.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work