• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Ellis Keddie History Coursework How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin? In the space of one year Russia received two revolutions; the overthrow of the tsar and his regime in February of 1917 and then the Bolshevik revolution in October of the same year. Vladimir Lenin, a man born into a respectable Russian family with several skills, very much influenced the Bolshevik revolution and debatably had an effect on the March uprising of the peasants and working class. In the first revolution of 1917 tsar Nicholas II was thrown from power and The Provisional Government took its place. This was caused by several different factors which all culminated together to form this result. Arguably one of the main factors which caused the tsar to fall from power and fuelled the revolution was the failures in the war. The army fought bravely in the First World War but stood no chance against the Germans as they had little supplies, were badly led and treated appallingly by their aristocrat officers; this caused many to turn against the tsar and his views and go forward in mutiny and protest against him. The strikes and food shortages also led to many of the working class turning against the regime and joining the people against him. Lenin seemed to have no direct impact on the war efforts or the strikes and food shortages at the time as he wasn?t even in Russia, however, it is suggested that his Bolshevik Propaganda published in newspapers like ...read more.

Middle

It is most probable that the soldiers heard about these concepts and they may have contributed to them turning against the war and the government who had sent them there and made them begin to support the Bolsheviks. Also his development, along with Trotsky, of the idea that the proletariat, the working people, could carry through a socialist revolution without going through the so called ?bourgeois-democratic class? (the middle class) as it was too weak. The progression of this idea led to Bolshevik opposition of the Provisional Government, which many of the people liked as they were against the new government?s policies. This also led to Lenin writing up one of his most important piece of propaganda: The April Theses, and was a big contributor to the eventual October revolution. The second Lenin heard the March Revolution was taking place he immediately returned to Russia from exile in Europe, via a specially provided train from the Germans who were hoping he might cause more chaos. When Lenin arrived at Petrograd station he set out the Bolshevik programme in his ?April Theses?. This contained 2 very important and influential slogans: ?peace, land and bread? and ?all power to the soviets? which contrasted sharply with the cautious message of the provisional government. Support for the quick acting and appealing promises the Bolshevik?s were making rapidly increased, in particularly in the army and the soviets. However, an unknown Menshevik writer in 1917 said ?The Bolshevik speaker would ask ?do you need more land? ...read more.

Conclusion

Economic problems including inflation, food shortages and the unsuccessful war increased discontent for the current regime and made it easier for Lenin to get the people on his side and in support. Even though Lenin did not cause these factors; he used them very much to his advantage in gaining support and then seeing through the revolution. In Conclusion, In the February revolution Lenin played a very minimal role and hardly affected it at all, the only way he might have done is if his ideas written in Bolshevik newspapers had been being spread around, which is probable but not exactly certain and maybe only a small percentage of Russians even knew who he was. However his part in the November revolution was much more important. I believe that even though the November revolution was widely labelled as Lenin?s revolution it was not fully down to him and his sole contribution. Lenin certainly had a bigger role in the revolution than anyone else but great historical changes cannot be pinned down to individuals. I very much agree with historian Robert Service?s point written in 1990 that ?there were other mighty factors at work as well in Russia in 1917? Lenin simply could not have or even co-ordinated everything.? He played very much so a catalytic role in the revolution by co-ordinating it, convincing doubters and planning the whole arrangement, his theories revolutionised the minds of the people and without him this sought of revolution would never gone ahead even if he did make up some promises he couldn?t fulfil along the way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    he did, but it seems that Stalin's dream of powerful Russia might of gotten him overexcited and made him do all of these horrible war crimes against the people. Lenin was extremely careful in using the secret police, while Stalin felt more felt more secure to use the secret police

  2. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    The October Revolution ended the phase of the revolution started in February, replacing Russia's short-lived provisional government with a Soviet one. Although many Bolsheviks (such as Leon Trotsky) supported a soviet democracy, the 'reform from above' model gained definitive power when Lenin died and Stalin gained control.

  1. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    The Bolshevik revolution would thrive on these campaigns of 'hate' with the support of a revolution craving proletariat. Furthermore, the role of Trotsky in securing the services of the 'Red Army' proved clinical to the final success of the Bolsheviks.

  2. What problems did Lenin face when he became leader of Russia, after the Bolshevik ...

    It has a totally population of 125 million which was made up of 22 different nationalities. Many of them hated being ruled by Russia. This is what made the country so hard to govern. As there were no elections, as Russia was led by autocracy, people did not get their say in how the government was run.

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    But the Tsarist government rejected collaboration with non-governmental agencies and Nicholas II refused to replace any of his ministers so as to produce a more proficient administration. This forced 236 of the 422 Duma legislatures to unite in a 'Progressive Bloc' made up of the Octobrists, Kadets, Nationalists and the Progressive Industrialists.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    Russia's leader he would have to make changes to the way he ran Russia. The result was The October Manifesto. This meant that Nicholas would become a figurehead, leaving the important decisions to elected politicians (rather like the monarch in Britain)

  1. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    It is Lenin's interpretations of Marxist theory within the agrarian Russian Empire of the early 20th century. Lenin reversed Marx's order of economics over politics, allowing for a political revolution led by a vanguard Party of professional revolutionaries rather than a spontaneous uprising of the working class as predicted by Marx.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    of Bolshevik propaganda he said ?The situation is critical in the extreme. In fact, it is now absolutely clear that to delay the uprising would be fatal?. Conclusively, Lenin was confident in his preparations to position the Bolsheviks at their optimum condition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work