• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Ellis Keddie History Coursework How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin? In the space of one year Russia received two revolutions; the overthrow of the tsar and his regime in February of 1917 and then the Bolshevik revolution in October of the same year. Vladimir Lenin, a man born into a respectable Russian family with several skills, very much influenced the Bolshevik revolution and debatably had an effect on the March uprising of the peasants and working class. In the first revolution of 1917 tsar Nicholas II was thrown from power and The Provisional Government took its place. This was caused by several different factors which all culminated together to form this result. Arguably one of the main factors which caused the tsar to fall from power and fuelled the revolution was the failures in the war. The army fought bravely in the First World War but stood no chance against the Germans as they had little supplies, were badly led and treated appallingly by their aristocrat officers; this caused many to turn against the tsar and his views and go forward in mutiny and protest against him. The strikes and food shortages also led to many of the working class turning against the regime and joining the people against him. Lenin seemed to have no direct impact on the war efforts or the strikes and food shortages at the time as he wasn?t even in Russia, however, it is suggested that his Bolshevik Propaganda published in newspapers like ...read more.

Middle

It is most probable that the soldiers heard about these concepts and they may have contributed to them turning against the war and the government who had sent them there and made them begin to support the Bolsheviks. Also his development, along with Trotsky, of the idea that the proletariat, the working people, could carry through a socialist revolution without going through the so called ?bourgeois-democratic class? (the middle class) as it was too weak. The progression of this idea led to Bolshevik opposition of the Provisional Government, which many of the people liked as they were against the new government?s policies. This also led to Lenin writing up one of his most important piece of propaganda: The April Theses, and was a big contributor to the eventual October revolution. The second Lenin heard the March Revolution was taking place he immediately returned to Russia from exile in Europe, via a specially provided train from the Germans who were hoping he might cause more chaos. When Lenin arrived at Petrograd station he set out the Bolshevik programme in his ?April Theses?. This contained 2 very important and influential slogans: ?peace, land and bread? and ?all power to the soviets? which contrasted sharply with the cautious message of the provisional government. Support for the quick acting and appealing promises the Bolshevik?s were making rapidly increased, in particularly in the army and the soviets. However, an unknown Menshevik writer in 1917 said ?The Bolshevik speaker would ask ?do you need more land? ...read more.

Conclusion

Economic problems including inflation, food shortages and the unsuccessful war increased discontent for the current regime and made it easier for Lenin to get the people on his side and in support. Even though Lenin did not cause these factors; he used them very much to his advantage in gaining support and then seeing through the revolution. In Conclusion, In the February revolution Lenin played a very minimal role and hardly affected it at all, the only way he might have done is if his ideas written in Bolshevik newspapers had been being spread around, which is probable but not exactly certain and maybe only a small percentage of Russians even knew who he was. However his part in the November revolution was much more important. I believe that even though the November revolution was widely labelled as Lenin?s revolution it was not fully down to him and his sole contribution. Lenin certainly had a bigger role in the revolution than anyone else but great historical changes cannot be pinned down to individuals. I very much agree with historian Robert Service?s point written in 1990 that ?there were other mighty factors at work as well in Russia in 1917? Lenin simply could not have or even co-ordinated everything.? He played very much so a catalytic role in the revolution by co-ordinating it, convincing doubters and planning the whole arrangement, his theories revolutionised the minds of the people and without him this sought of revolution would never gone ahead even if he did make up some promises he couldn?t fulfil along the way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Significant Was Leon Trotsky's Role In the October/November Russian Revolution In 1917

    Included in this group of future agitators was Leon Trotsky. This uprising of the radical groups is reasonably justified given the government continued to make the same mistakes that the Tsar had, leaving no explanation for the Provisional Governments existence at all.2 The government itself was highly bourgeois in its

  2. What problems did Lenin face when he became leader of Russia, after the Bolshevik ...

    It has a totally population of 125 million which was made up of 22 different nationalities. Many of them hated being ruled by Russia. This is what made the country so hard to govern. As there were no elections, as Russia was led by autocracy, people did not get their say in how the government was run.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This shows that the writer of source D blames the Tsar's neglect of his duties for Russia's problems. Sources C and D disagree about whether the Tsar cared about his duties to Russia or not. Sources C and D also disagree about whether or not the Tsar is to blame for Russia's problems.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    The 1905 revolution was infact the first of two revolutions were other parties tried to take Russia from under Tsar Nicholas rule. But it failed because Tsar Nicholas still had the support of his army, which helped protect him. But now Tsar Nicholas released that for him to survive as

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Although most of it is true, it cannot be very reliable as at this time Bukharin knew that eventually Stalin was going to have him executed and therefore just tried to get him message across in the most exaggerated way possible.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    to gain more public support, this could just be another approach of gaining support. Over all, the fact that Stalin had written the sources proves that it can not provide any useful evidence of Stalin at all, thus it is untrustworthy.

  1. The February Revolution 1917.

    and can't admit to themselves that they cannot deal with situation and that it is out of their reach. 'Tsarism collapsed at the beginning of 1917 because Nicholas was a weak Tsar who did not listen to his advisors' I think after studying all the sources, that there were other causal factors which forced the Tsar Nicholas to abdicate.

  2. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    ongoing crises to have set the masses in their 'revolutionary mindset', the third and in many way largest revolution - that of the peasants - probably would not have happened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work