• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How stable was Russia in 1914

Extracts from this document...


How stable was Russia in 1914 In 1914 Russia was seen to be both stable and unstable. In fact it could be said that there was no stability in parts of Russia, like the cities due to many key problems with the government, the economy and the society. Due to reasons like the economy, political situations and discontented people in society, Russia was unstable. Russians were slowly uprising against the Tsar and his council, and this was a major issue. However Russia was also seen to be quite stable in her rural areas, this was partially because peasants were happy about crop rotations and good harvest. The Tsar saw that many Russians were discontent and in fear of a revolution, he tried to improve situations. The Tsar responded to this situation by appointing member of his government who he thought could vastly improve circumstances in Russia. ...read more.


The Tsars aim was to satisfy people's needs to an extent, by giving them a little bit of "freedom". By this I mean that this was the seen to be "freedom" for them as they began to get what they want, however this was just minor to what would happen if there was a revolution, but to keep them people quiet the Tsar gave them a little "freedom". The reform in education meant that even lower class people in Russia were allowed to go to school. However these changes began to make lower class people want more freedom, they might have believed that due to them being discontent, which could lead to revolution made them have "freedom" then they believed that they could get more. So it was seen that due to society being discontent with situations in Russia she was unstable. ...read more.


In 1914 Russia join the World War however they weren't quite stable, as a result there were many problems, for example poor railway and poor roads. The joining of the war, with Britain and France also showed how circumstances came fourth. She wasn't ready for the war and this also lead to the more Russian instability. Overall Russia at the beginning seemed to be unstable and in turmoil, with Russian people rising up against the Tsar and his council. The Tsar was smart and so he made some changes which would briefly halt the matter of revolution. But as all seemed to be going well (Russia began to stabilize) and that changes began to settle in to wide areas of Russia, that she went to war against Germany. Russia was in serious trouble as she was not quite ready for the war because she was still a bit unstable and also the fact that revolution was inevitable. Kumar Mehta History Miss Long Page: 1 27/1//04 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. to what extent was russia stable between 1906 and 1914?

    Moreover black earth regions were still very backward. As well, it made the Marxist unhappy. Making the Peasant content meant no revolution. Subsequently there was only a certain extent that Russia could be stable to. Economically, Russia was in a lot of danger.

  2. How stable was Russia in 1914?

    As the became more revolutionary the became more educated and low wages, long hours and the fact they could not voice their opinions about their grievances made them seethe with discontent.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    It cost the USSR an estimated 27 million dead. A million died in the siege of Leningrad alone. Vast areas of Russia were annexed by Hitler or completely destroyed in the Nazi's "scorched earth" policy. Almost 50 per cent of all urban living space in occupied territory - 1.2 million

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    says that he should do it 'for your baby's sake' which has the most meaning to him because she means their son Alexis (the haemophilic) who will is the heir to his thrown. Source F suggests the opposite view. Written by Vladimir Roudenev, who investigated the Tsar regime, it says

  1. How Stable was Russia by the Start of WW1?

    However, the Russian people were left with little confidence in Nicholas' leadership. Just before the start of the world war Russia had never before seemed more vulnerable. The Russo-Japanese War, 1904-5 had embarrased and dented Russia's pride, and now only triumph in the World War would help restore Russia's greatness

  2. History - Russia

    However, Source C comes from 1924, six years later than Sources A and B. As a consequence of this, the Sergeyev's findings could potentially have been distorted in the fullness of time. Conversely, there are also a few similarities - for instance, Sources A and B both agree that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work