• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

Extracts from this document...


How Successful Was Roosevelt's New Deal? Roosevelt set out with clear views on what the New Deal was to do, but not so sure as to what measures this would involve. During the time in which he was campaigning for the election, it became clear the Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to use the full power of the United States' Government to relieve Americans from the great depression. His main priorities and characteristics are listed below: > Getting Americans back to work > Protecting their savings and property > Providing relief for the sick, old and unemployed > He believed strongly in an 'active Government' to improve the lives of ordinary Americans > He had plans to spend vast quantities of public money on getting people back to work. As Governor of New York he had already started doing this in his own state > He was not afraid to ask for advice on important issues from a wide variety f experts such as factory owners, union leaders or economists He succeeded to some extent in each of these tasks, but getting the American population back to work was a constant headache for him. When Franklin D. Roosevelt came to power the country was in the worst depression that America had ever had. The lack of confidence, by the American public, caused 659 banks to fail in 1929. AS the banks began closing, the people's confidence plummeted and in 1930, another 1352 banks were forced to close. Even the biggest banks suffered heavily. In December 930 The Bank of the United States, in New York, went bankrupt. It had 400,000 depositors, the majority of whom were recent immigrants. Almost 1/3 of the population of New York saved with it. To make matters worse, 1931 saw many European banks close their doors to customers. A billion dollars of hard cash were withdrawn from banks and put into deposit boxes, or stored at home, as panic set in. ...read more.


The circling ravens perhaps indicate that the N.K.B.D. had complete control over the people. On 12th December 1938 Stalin signed the death sentence of 3182 innocent people and then went to watch a film in the evening and these pyramids are the results of these, as well as other, acts of Stalin. Stalin is gesturing towards the pyramids as if he was proud of his achievements. This source tells us that Stalin killed a great number of people and showed no remorse for doing so. This source depicts Stalin as a monster rather than a man. Source B is a painting, which depicts Stalin mingling with workers, insinuating that he is a man of the people. It is an official Soviet painting, showing that it conforms to the 'Socialist Realism' Policy that Stalin introduced to ensure that all pictures, songs and pieces of writing corresponded with Stalin's views and policies and did not portray them in a negative light. Source B shows Stalin as a sociable and popular character. In the background is a dam, similar to the Dneiper dam, which meant that Russia had the largest Hydro-Electric Power station in Europe. In reality, these projects were often using forced labour, usually inmates in a gulag. In the painting, the workers are happy and are talking to Stalin. This painting has undergone the 'Socialist Realism' policy and so could not possibly show Stalin in a negative light, as the creator would, most likely, have been punished. This painting was created during the 1930's when the first five-year plans were in place. The aim of these plans was to modernise Russia from a backward peasant society into a modern industrial state, which was able to withstand the threat of any future foreign invasion. One of the targets that Stalin set was for the amount of electricity produced to increase to 22 million kilowatts. The dam is shown in the painting was regarded as essential to achieve this goal. ...read more.


This is possibly because what they did or said, or who they were was not important. Stalin simply wanted to show the rest of the worlds that Russia was a democratic nation but it was obvious that this was not the case. Even though the trial is not important as the outcome would have been decided long before anybody was formally, the entire trial has to be annotated to be used for propaganda purposes to 'brainwash' the Russian people that the accused were to blame for the problems of Russia. Source J is mocking Russia as a whole, rather than just the show trials. This is because the cartoonist is saying that no matter how democratic Russia tries to make anything, Stalin is still in control as he has control over everyone. Source I is mocking the actual trials and, although it does illustrate how un-democratic Russia is, the main focus is on the trails themselves. Both sources were written in Capitalist countries and both sources portray the show trials as absurd and un-democratic. They both show that Stalin was in control of Russia and that the outcome of the trials has already been decided. Source J is very serious, as Stalin's posture is one of Authority as he speaks whereas in Source I, the posture of those who are accused is comical, seeking to belittle the democratic element in Russia even more. The reason for this could be that America was not involved in the war until a later date and so could use a comedy to undermine Russia. France was in the war, which at that time was against Germany, and Russia was allied to Germany following the Rapallo Treaty of 1922. This means that the French would be much more hostile towards Russia and so would use a much more serious tone. Source J does not show the accused, and it does not show what will happen to the accused, probably as the cartoon is focussing on Russia's totalitarianist regime by using the show trials as an example, rather than directly mocking the show trials. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess The Impact Of Stalin On Russia And The Russian People.

    4 star(s)

    Stalin also had different effects on different sections of society. One if these were ethnic minorities. In Stalin reign the non-Russian nationalities of the soviet-union were at first allowed to preserve their own cultural traditions and identities. But this policy was then replaced in 1934 with the policy of russification.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Stalin needed to prove to himself and other leading Bolsheviks that he was the successor and equal of Lenin. His economic policies were central to this. The economic transformation of the USSR, taking the revolution forward in a giant lap towards socialism, would establish him as a leader of historic importance.

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    8-9 marks Level 5 You explain how reasons are inter- connected (linked together) 10 marks 7. The following were reasons why Tsarist rule ended in 1917: I. The influence of Rasputin II. The collapse of the army III. Strikes and food shortages Which of these reasons do you think was the most important?

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    To the Party leadership the reason for this failure was due to the local Party secretaries who refused to reform the Party. These secretaries looked after their own allies and purged innocent Party members, instead of responding to central government directives to improve Party efficiency.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    By showing that he cares for every man in the source he shows how manipulative he really was. Stalin uses the source to manipulate the USSR into thinking that he is in fact a person that cares for every man.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    had them dismissed from the party and lost all the privileges that went with the membership. It is estimated Stalin had 500,000 party members arrested, on charges that he had little, or no, evidence to back up. He then turned his attention to the army and the navy, and removed one in five of the officers in the army.

  1. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    Source A implies that collectivisation was voluntary and condemns forced collectivisation where as [c2]in Source C Stalin says it was absolutely necessary making it appear as if there was little choice involved. In source A Stalin attacks attempts by peasants to collectivise using military force furthermore this is reinforced in

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This could be why Bukharin hated him Stalin so. Bukharin man returned to Russia to stand up for himself, but unfortunately was a victim of Stalin's purges. This proves that Stalin must have seen him as a threat and proves that Stalin was paranoid. From studying both these sources, I think that source F is more reliable than source E because source F makes sense.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work