• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Sir Robert Peel's Irish policy (1841-45)?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was Sir Robert Peel's Irish policy (1841-45)? Sir Robert Peel's strong-nerved and far-sighted approach to Ireland's social discontent demonstrated all the best attributes of the innovative politician that he was. However, the minimal effect felt by Irish people highlights the eventually fatal inefficiency of his leadership. Peel's policies were largely based on the principle of "coercion and conciliation": at first he took an authoritarian stance, and only later looked to be persuasively appeasing. In doing so, Peel hoped to promote Unionism, and hence to instil in the Irish a sense of loyalty towards Britain. He aimed to stop Ireland's radical threat by winning over the Irish Catholics, and to create a convincingly secure long-term relationship between the two governments. Tragically, it was this last aim that Peel, and many of his successors, found most elusive. The challenge posed by Ireland's resistance to British rule necessitated willingness on Peel's part to gain the support of the country's people. The Catholic population made up over seventy percent of the main, and with the vote granted them by 1829's Emancipation, they had become a vital election target. It was widely understood that the Catholic clergy guided and inspired the laity, and Peel recognised their vital place in Irish society. ...read more.


Daniel O'Connell's Repeal Association was the focus of this movement. Popular for its constructive resentment of British rule, the Association could be joined for as little as 1d per year, and hence attracted huge membership. Plans to set up an independent Irish Parliament in Dublin provoked fears that it would be used to repeal the Act of Union, persuading Peel to act promptly and resolutely. By the summer of 1843, the Repeal movement was growing strongly, posing an unprecedented threat to British control. The situation exposed Peel's authoritarian side. He announced that any attempt to abolish the Union would be met with unrelenting force, a move encouraged by reactionaries such as Lord Wellington, who urged Peel to "attack remorselessly." However, rather than confront the country as a whole, Peel targeted what he perceived to be the route of the problem: O'Connell himself. Banning the Repeal Association's next mass meeting, Peel had O'Connell arrested, tried and imprisoned for sedition. The action, at the county of Clontarf in October 1843, diminished O'Connell's reputation and sent out a clear message to Ireland's Republicans: rebellion would not be tolerated. The so-called 'monster' meetings, which had in the past attracted upwards of a million people each, faded radically, and O'Connell, who had surrendered to British arrest, would never have the same influence again. ...read more.


The funding supplied to the Catholic seminaries paled in insignificance to the money provided annually to the Anglicans; being all too obvious to the Irish public, this would forever embitter them against Peel and, for all their inventiveness, against his policies. Furthermore, from the Irish Famine alone, one can see that this final, and most important, objective failed. It was a fatal blow, both for the Irish people, and for Peel's political career. Having confirmed Catholicism's diminished status by proclaiming his support of the 'Home' churches, Sir Robert Peel always faced an uphill struggle to win back the approval of the Irish public. His policies were well-funded and well thought out, but lacked the effectiveness needed to seriously impact on Ireland's people. Whilst being driven by the correct intention, the Maynooth and Colleges Bills exposed Peel's inability to engage with the Irish public. Other political manoeuvres, such as the introduction of Lord Heytesbury, appeared to be hollow gestures; certainly, their impact was minimal. From this perspective, it appears that Britain's true objective in Ireland was not to provide long-term prosperity to the ailing population, but to guarantee England's short-term safety, and to deter other potential rebels. In this sense, Peel was successful. But, as the Irish Famine affirmed soon afterwards, Ireland's public had been poorly served by Britain's Government. It is no wonder that they wanted their own. 7/3/2005 Luke Bullen SPC ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    15 were executed in early May. The barbarity with which prisoners and civilians were treated incited anger and resentment against the British in all classes in S. Ireland. Those who went into prison mild nationalists often came out hardened revolutionaries.

  2. The emergence of Unionism

    Their necessary social integration (being in the minority) had made them more dependant upon their catholic neighbours emotionally and economically. They did on the other hand have influence at Westminster and were well intergrated with British conservatives, where they were said to have direct access to the corridors of power.

  1. How far do the sources support the view that Irish Nationalism was an 'increasingly ...

    This shows cultural nationalism to not only be distinctly separate from constitutional nationalism, but also critical of it. It shows that the Gaelic League campaigned against all forms of 'West-Britonism', like Mitchell in Source one. Therefore, cultural nationalism would claim that constitutional nationalism to be a dangerous deviation from the goal of nationalism.

  2. Why were some forms of opposition more successful than others in the period 1798-1921?

    The fact that these two Bills actually got this far bears testimony to the fact that people were beginning to debate how the union should be composed, not whether there should be one.

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    But what I think it did was it masked other differences. And other differences were that those who had been in control of the Republican movement during the 1960s were working towards a reformist, rather than a revolutionary program, were not militant enough, were antagonizing Catholics through the use of Marxist jargon, and therefore were not going to succeed.

  2. "The Failure of the British to Solve the Irish Question Arises From Ignorance and ...

    which shows a very ignorant approach by the British and how little respect they had for the Irish. In 1886 the first Home Rule Bill was defeated in the Commons due to the defection of 96 liberals. By 1892 the Liberals had returned to power, after a short spell out

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work