• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society? Stalin was the Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922 and came to power as the result of the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin followed the principles of Marxism which may defined as the 'theory and practice of the proletarian revolution'. They maintained that liberal capitalism could not achieve human emancipation but only through a 'utopian' community that worked together, without classes, could this be achieved. Stalin placed huge emphasis on these theories being put into practice and he did this through fear and force. The political and cultural aims of Stalin's regime were to identify the totalitarian rule of the Communist party with stability and legitimacy. Stalin lay great stress on religion. According to the Socialists, they viewed religion as the 'opium of the people' and were desperate to remove it from society. A number of different religions could be found scattered across Russia. In the countryside, there was widespread support for the Russian Orthodox Church, in the south and central Asia was the belief in Islam and there were also many Jews about. The Socialists brought about the destruction of religion through means of severe persecution and destruction of religious buildings. In many ways, religion was removed, but Stalin failed to remove it from the people's lives altogether. The persecution did impel people to drift away from religion. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in 'gangs' of orphans and beggars roaming the street, increasing the crime rate. At this point Stalin realised that he had to restrict the freedom of abortion and divorce ('The State is not at all interested in the continuation of divorce proceedings'). This was in order to pull the family back together as he expressed his view that 'the state cannot exist without the family'. He also declared that religious marriage was not forbidden, but it had legal significance. He did this in the hopes that the power of religion would further be reduced. And so, although Stalin placed huge emphasis on the traditional view of the family and working women, this fell in the 1930's from being poplar in the 1920's. In the 1920's there was a huge boom in the field of experimental creativity in the areas of music, art, writing and design but in the 1930's, Stalin attempted to control the creative arts. Artists and writers were no longer allowed to experiment with abstract work but were to produce products of propaganda, which showed a happy and healthy Stalin who was one with the people as well as showing collective farms and a strong industry. This made people totally subservient to the needs of the regime and allowed Stalin to influence more power over the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

But in the long run, Stalin was very successful in removing and objectors and he accomplished this through the use of his ruthless secret police. Stalin also used effective propaganda (as I previously mentioned) in order to gain popularity and support. His methods proved to be very prosperous as people began to recognise him as a great, powerful man but who was one with the peasants and didn't consider himself higher than them. This allowed him put forth his principles easily upon the people as they now trusted him and felt that what he said must surely be right. But, evidently, not all people believed all he said - religious activists and other members of parties. Stalin also made use of the Terror to control the USSR. By this he used 'Purges' to remove any enemies and anyone whom he thought might turn against the party. One problem with this method was that by doing so, he removed nearly 35,000 of his best officers, and this caused great loss during World War 2. And so, in conclusion, I would say that Stalin was successful in changing the outside and the look of Russia as a Socialist country (for example, the effective use of putting down rival parties and removing religion on the outside). But he was unable to change the people and their way of life. People were not prepared to entirely leave religion behind and he could not monopolise the families or the role of women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Almost 300,000 prisoners were set to work on the Belomor Canal with promises that they would be set free when it was completed. The camps consisted of class enemies such as Kulaks, people who slacked off in work and saboteurs.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    a large buffer zone or 'Iron Curtain' on his western border by setting up communist regimes in Rumania, Bulgaria, Hungary, East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia13. These events were understood by the Western powers to be an example of Stalin's desire to impose communism on the whole of Europe.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    This is exactly what happened as by the end of the second Five Year Plans in 1937, Russia came out as a powerful and modern state which matched the industrial forces of Western countries. She no longer dreaded an incursion by them and it was the mixture of this fresh

  2. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    When the land was shared out after the revolution, peasant landholdings had tended to become smaller than before 1917. The large estates and large farms that supplied cities disappeared. They had been divided up amongst the land-hungry peasants. On the majority of these smaller holdings, people ate most of what they could produce.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    He says that the use of terror and executions for the defence of socialism and communism were considerations Stalin had to make when evaluating the best interests of the party and workers. He is trying to remain unbiased and give an argument understanding Stalin and his methods; because of this

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In order for Stalin to make significant changes in industry he needed a lot more workers in his cities. By collectivisation Stalin made more food and because the farms now state controlled more of that food was available to the workers in the cities at a faster rate and for much cheaper than before.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The evidence suggests that Stalin wasn't at all how he portrays himself in the source. The source shows some interesting things that we learn about Stalin, the source portrays that Stalin would do anything to gain public support this includes playing with peoples emotions it also shows that Stalin had

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    Trotsky for example was close to Stalin when Lenin was alive, but as soon as he died and Stalin received some authority he had Trotsky exiled and then murdered. We are also not told of the labour camps as well as the starvation of millions due to collectivisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work