• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society? Stalin was the Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922 and came to power as the result of the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin followed the principles of Marxism which may defined as the 'theory and practice of the proletarian revolution'. They maintained that liberal capitalism could not achieve human emancipation but only through a 'utopian' community that worked together, without classes, could this be achieved. Stalin placed huge emphasis on these theories being put into practice and he did this through fear and force. The political and cultural aims of Stalin's regime were to identify the totalitarian rule of the Communist party with stability and legitimacy. Stalin lay great stress on religion. According to the Socialists, they viewed religion as the 'opium of the people' and were desperate to remove it from society. A number of different religions could be found scattered across Russia. In the countryside, there was widespread support for the Russian Orthodox Church, in the south and central Asia was the belief in Islam and there were also many Jews about. The Socialists brought about the destruction of religion through means of severe persecution and destruction of religious buildings. In many ways, religion was removed, but Stalin failed to remove it from the people's lives altogether. The persecution did impel people to drift away from religion. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in 'gangs' of orphans and beggars roaming the street, increasing the crime rate. At this point Stalin realised that he had to restrict the freedom of abortion and divorce ('The State is not at all interested in the continuation of divorce proceedings'). This was in order to pull the family back together as he expressed his view that 'the state cannot exist without the family'. He also declared that religious marriage was not forbidden, but it had legal significance. He did this in the hopes that the power of religion would further be reduced. And so, although Stalin placed huge emphasis on the traditional view of the family and working women, this fell in the 1930's from being poplar in the 1920's. In the 1920's there was a huge boom in the field of experimental creativity in the areas of music, art, writing and design but in the 1930's, Stalin attempted to control the creative arts. Artists and writers were no longer allowed to experiment with abstract work but were to produce products of propaganda, which showed a happy and healthy Stalin who was one with the people as well as showing collective farms and a strong industry. This made people totally subservient to the needs of the regime and allowed Stalin to influence more power over the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

But in the long run, Stalin was very successful in removing and objectors and he accomplished this through the use of his ruthless secret police. Stalin also used effective propaganda (as I previously mentioned) in order to gain popularity and support. His methods proved to be very prosperous as people began to recognise him as a great, powerful man but who was one with the peasants and didn't consider himself higher than them. This allowed him put forth his principles easily upon the people as they now trusted him and felt that what he said must surely be right. But, evidently, not all people believed all he said - religious activists and other members of parties. Stalin also made use of the Terror to control the USSR. By this he used 'Purges' to remove any enemies and anyone whom he thought might turn against the party. One problem with this method was that by doing so, he removed nearly 35,000 of his best officers, and this caused great loss during World War 2. And so, in conclusion, I would say that Stalin was successful in changing the outside and the look of Russia as a Socialist country (for example, the effective use of putting down rival parties and removing religion on the outside). But he was unable to change the people and their way of life. People were not prepared to entirely leave religion behind and he could not monopolise the families or the role of women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Also, gigantic modern industrial complexes were built for many of the USSR's workers. Some industrial enterprises set up their own shops, bringing in food from farms, and the peasants supplied towns with milk, eggs, vegetables and meat from their private plots.

  2. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    * Itching to move forward towards the establishment of a Socialist Society. So they warmly welcomed Stalin's 'Left-Turn' (adopting ideas from the left-wing of the party) in his policies for modernisation and industrialisation of the USSR. * The Five-Year Plans represented a significant step towards achieving the goals of the revolution.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Tomsky ordered him out, and Stalin left, shaking with anger. Moments later a shot rang out. Tomsky, the good Bolshevik that he was, was opposed to individual terror. He had chosen to kill himself with his pistol rather than to kill Stalin.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    The revolution caused disturbance in education. Young communists called the 'Komosomo' beat up teachers and richer students. Many teachers lost their jobs. School taught social and political work and got rid of tests; the students would assess their own progress.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source J is practical, it shows the Supreme Soviets as it really was, everyone agreeing with Stalin and claiming that what he believed in was true. However Source I only shows how ridiculous the show trials were, source J goes as far as showing the new constitution after Stalin's show trials were over.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    The production of coal increased again more than doubled from 64.3 million tons in 1933 to 128 million tons in 1937. Meanwhile, as far as improvement in agriculture is concerned, the beneficial method of collectivisation brought a dramatic increase in grain production - from 69 million tons in 1933 to

  1. Stalin man or monster

    It not only ensured that the communists where portrayed in good light but that they also played an integral part in helping the people. It could also be used to show unity and solidarity between the communist nations to the allies.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    In conclusion, I think that there were many achievements, accomplished by the Five Year Plans and there is no doubt that these achievements brought Stalin glory. However, I also think that the achievements made the USSR people aware that Stalin did this to make the USSR a much secure place

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work