• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society? Stalin was the Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922 and came to power as the result of the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin followed the principles of Marxism which may defined as the 'theory and practice of the proletarian revolution'. They maintained that liberal capitalism could not achieve human emancipation but only through a 'utopian' community that worked together, without classes, could this be achieved. Stalin placed huge emphasis on these theories being put into practice and he did this through fear and force. The political and cultural aims of Stalin's regime were to identify the totalitarian rule of the Communist party with stability and legitimacy. Stalin lay great stress on religion. According to the Socialists, they viewed religion as the 'opium of the people' and were desperate to remove it from society. A number of different religions could be found scattered across Russia. In the countryside, there was widespread support for the Russian Orthodox Church, in the south and central Asia was the belief in Islam and there were also many Jews about. The Socialists brought about the destruction of religion through means of severe persecution and destruction of religious buildings. In many ways, religion was removed, but Stalin failed to remove it from the people's lives altogether. The persecution did impel people to drift away from religion. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in 'gangs' of orphans and beggars roaming the street, increasing the crime rate. At this point Stalin realised that he had to restrict the freedom of abortion and divorce ('The State is not at all interested in the continuation of divorce proceedings'). This was in order to pull the family back together as he expressed his view that 'the state cannot exist without the family'. He also declared that religious marriage was not forbidden, but it had legal significance. He did this in the hopes that the power of religion would further be reduced. And so, although Stalin placed huge emphasis on the traditional view of the family and working women, this fell in the 1930's from being poplar in the 1920's. In the 1920's there was a huge boom in the field of experimental creativity in the areas of music, art, writing and design but in the 1930's, Stalin attempted to control the creative arts. Artists and writers were no longer allowed to experiment with abstract work but were to produce products of propaganda, which showed a happy and healthy Stalin who was one with the people as well as showing collective farms and a strong industry. This made people totally subservient to the needs of the regime and allowed Stalin to influence more power over the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

But in the long run, Stalin was very successful in removing and objectors and he accomplished this through the use of his ruthless secret police. Stalin also used effective propaganda (as I previously mentioned) in order to gain popularity and support. His methods proved to be very prosperous as people began to recognise him as a great, powerful man but who was one with the peasants and didn't consider himself higher than them. This allowed him put forth his principles easily upon the people as they now trusted him and felt that what he said must surely be right. But, evidently, not all people believed all he said - religious activists and other members of parties. Stalin also made use of the Terror to control the USSR. By this he used 'Purges' to remove any enemies and anyone whom he thought might turn against the party. One problem with this method was that by doing so, he removed nearly 35,000 of his best officers, and this caused great loss during World War 2. And so, in conclusion, I would say that Stalin was successful in changing the outside and the look of Russia as a Socialist country (for example, the effective use of putting down rival parties and removing religion on the outside). But he was unable to change the people and their way of life. People were not prepared to entirely leave religion behind and he could not monopolise the families or the role of women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    By 1937 an approximate 18 million people were sent to labour camps while 10 million died and by doing this Stalin injured the USSR immeasurably. This allowed Hitler, the leader of Germany, to invade the USSR while it was very weak and powerless.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin was always aspiring to be better then everyone else and did this by removing every person who posed as a threat to him. In source F Bukharin is speaking about Stalin's ambition to be the best, 'If someone speaks better then he does, the man is for it!

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Source I, is an American source and is clearly biased as they were against communism. Thus is would be very obvious that they would want to criticise the Soviet Union's methods. The source portrays the courtroom at Stalin's show trails.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Also, there was a steady built up of hospitals and nursing rooms were built in each region in Russia to take care of her rising population with so many hard working workers. All factors considered, I have come to a conclusion that I disagree with the idea of Stalin's glorification

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In order for Stalin to make significant changes in industry he needed a lot more workers in his cities. By collectivisation Stalin made more food and because the farms now state controlled more of that food was available to the workers in the cities at a faster rate and for much cheaper than before.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    These targets were ridiculously high and very ambitious; they expected industrial production to double in just 5 years. The first five-year plan was to concentrate on heavy industry, such as coal, iron, oil and steel; it also concentrated on making capital (machinery).

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    This tells you what the British public is thinking, as they have not got any concrete information out of the USSR, therefore anything they hear is rumours. The USA reporter has got 'truthful reports?!' written on his paper. This suggests that they are also not sure about what they hear and whether it is true or not.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Foner (New York, 1978). Hopes for Liberalization and the Murder of Kirov In 1934, the Soviet Union was still devoted to industrialising, trying to catch up, as Stalin had put it, rather than let the other powers overwhelm them - Stalin's version of the Darwinian struggle, vaguely similar to Hitler's.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work