• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society? Stalin was the Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922 and came to power as the result of the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin followed the principles of Marxism which may defined as the 'theory and practice of the proletarian revolution'. They maintained that liberal capitalism could not achieve human emancipation but only through a 'utopian' community that worked together, without classes, could this be achieved. Stalin placed huge emphasis on these theories being put into practice and he did this through fear and force. The political and cultural aims of Stalin's regime were to identify the totalitarian rule of the Communist party with stability and legitimacy. Stalin lay great stress on religion. According to the Socialists, they viewed religion as the 'opium of the people' and were desperate to remove it from society. A number of different religions could be found scattered across Russia. In the countryside, there was widespread support for the Russian Orthodox Church, in the south and central Asia was the belief in Islam and there were also many Jews about. The Socialists brought about the destruction of religion through means of severe persecution and destruction of religious buildings. In many ways, religion was removed, but Stalin failed to remove it from the people's lives altogether. The persecution did impel people to drift away from religion. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in 'gangs' of orphans and beggars roaming the street, increasing the crime rate. At this point Stalin realised that he had to restrict the freedom of abortion and divorce ('The State is not at all interested in the continuation of divorce proceedings'). This was in order to pull the family back together as he expressed his view that 'the state cannot exist without the family'. He also declared that religious marriage was not forbidden, but it had legal significance. He did this in the hopes that the power of religion would further be reduced. And so, although Stalin placed huge emphasis on the traditional view of the family and working women, this fell in the 1930's from being poplar in the 1920's. In the 1920's there was a huge boom in the field of experimental creativity in the areas of music, art, writing and design but in the 1930's, Stalin attempted to control the creative arts. Artists and writers were no longer allowed to experiment with abstract work but were to produce products of propaganda, which showed a happy and healthy Stalin who was one with the people as well as showing collective farms and a strong industry. This made people totally subservient to the needs of the regime and allowed Stalin to influence more power over the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

But in the long run, Stalin was very successful in removing and objectors and he accomplished this through the use of his ruthless secret police. Stalin also used effective propaganda (as I previously mentioned) in order to gain popularity and support. His methods proved to be very prosperous as people began to recognise him as a great, powerful man but who was one with the peasants and didn't consider himself higher than them. This allowed him put forth his principles easily upon the people as they now trusted him and felt that what he said must surely be right. But, evidently, not all people believed all he said - religious activists and other members of parties. Stalin also made use of the Terror to control the USSR. By this he used 'Purges' to remove any enemies and anyone whom he thought might turn against the party. One problem with this method was that by doing so, he removed nearly 35,000 of his best officers, and this caused great loss during World War 2. And so, in conclusion, I would say that Stalin was successful in changing the outside and the look of Russia as a Socialist country (for example, the effective use of putting down rival parties and removing religion on the outside). But he was unable to change the people and their way of life. People were not prepared to entirely leave religion behind and he could not monopolise the families or the role of women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Building these great industrial sites would have been hard work as they were built from scratch Stalin successfully invested into huge new tractor works that were built in Stalingrad, Kharkov and other places to meet the needs of mechanised agriculture.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    his devotion to the party, his ardent faith in the people, and love for the people. The source is clearly blinded by propaganda as it was published in 1947. It sees Stalin as the people of Russia saw Stalin, not aware of what his real acts were.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    in his speech in 1931, "All have beaten her because of her military, industrial and agricultural backwardness". Meanwhile, when the first Five Year Plans were under way in 1929, the laid back Russian public began to criticise the rapid speed of industrialisation.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    The countryside was affected more than cities, but 120,000 died in Kharkiv, 40,000 in Krasnodar and 20,000 in Stavropol." -Wikipedia.org 13:20, 20th January 2006. This statement illustrates the enormous extent to which collectivization was a human tragedy. Due to being taken from wikipedia the legitimacy of this source is questionable as wikipedia can be edited by anyone.

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    but honest Communists who were forced to make confessions due cruel and inhumane tortures and subsequently killed. Moreover the military purge of 1938 did not benefit the country at all due to its timing. The purge drastically reduced the size of the Red Army with the execution of some 30,000

  2. Stalin man or monster

    this story to try and illustrate that the lack of concern these men had was down to "our" government policies, "It seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people is the same attitude I met in far-off Siberia".

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    so tractors and more modern equipment was introduced having been produced as a result of the industrialisation of Russia. As a result of collectivisation and Stalin's five-year plans the population of the USSR increased from 159,200,000 in 1913 to 170,600,000 in 1939 and the grain harvest changed from 80.1 million

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    People had to change their beliefs and cultures in order to follow and worship Stalin. Money was also very scarce as Stalin was a firm believer in cheap labour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work