• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Stalin's desire to transform the Soviet society? Stalin was the Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922 and came to power as the result of the death of Lenin in 1924. Stalin followed the principles of Marxism which may defined as the 'theory and practice of the proletarian revolution'. They maintained that liberal capitalism could not achieve human emancipation but only through a 'utopian' community that worked together, without classes, could this be achieved. Stalin placed huge emphasis on these theories being put into practice and he did this through fear and force. The political and cultural aims of Stalin's regime were to identify the totalitarian rule of the Communist party with stability and legitimacy. Stalin lay great stress on religion. According to the Socialists, they viewed religion as the 'opium of the people' and were desperate to remove it from society. A number of different religions could be found scattered across Russia. In the countryside, there was widespread support for the Russian Orthodox Church, in the south and central Asia was the belief in Islam and there were also many Jews about. The Socialists brought about the destruction of religion through means of severe persecution and destruction of religious buildings. In many ways, religion was removed, but Stalin failed to remove it from the people's lives altogether. The persecution did impel people to drift away from religion. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in 'gangs' of orphans and beggars roaming the street, increasing the crime rate. At this point Stalin realised that he had to restrict the freedom of abortion and divorce ('The State is not at all interested in the continuation of divorce proceedings'). This was in order to pull the family back together as he expressed his view that 'the state cannot exist without the family'. He also declared that religious marriage was not forbidden, but it had legal significance. He did this in the hopes that the power of religion would further be reduced. And so, although Stalin placed huge emphasis on the traditional view of the family and working women, this fell in the 1930's from being poplar in the 1920's. In the 1920's there was a huge boom in the field of experimental creativity in the areas of music, art, writing and design but in the 1930's, Stalin attempted to control the creative arts. Artists and writers were no longer allowed to experiment with abstract work but were to produce products of propaganda, which showed a happy and healthy Stalin who was one with the people as well as showing collective farms and a strong industry. This made people totally subservient to the needs of the regime and allowed Stalin to influence more power over the people. ...read more.

Conclusion

But in the long run, Stalin was very successful in removing and objectors and he accomplished this through the use of his ruthless secret police. Stalin also used effective propaganda (as I previously mentioned) in order to gain popularity and support. His methods proved to be very prosperous as people began to recognise him as a great, powerful man but who was one with the peasants and didn't consider himself higher than them. This allowed him put forth his principles easily upon the people as they now trusted him and felt that what he said must surely be right. But, evidently, not all people believed all he said - religious activists and other members of parties. Stalin also made use of the Terror to control the USSR. By this he used 'Purges' to remove any enemies and anyone whom he thought might turn against the party. One problem with this method was that by doing so, he removed nearly 35,000 of his best officers, and this caused great loss during World War 2. And so, in conclusion, I would say that Stalin was successful in changing the outside and the look of Russia as a Socialist country (for example, the effective use of putting down rival parties and removing religion on the outside). But he was unable to change the people and their way of life. People were not prepared to entirely leave religion behind and he could not monopolise the families or the role of women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    There were quite a few ways in which Russian life improved. All peasants in Russia were tutored and became literate and good with numbers, farmers were given tractors and other tools to help harvest their crop, almost everyone in Russia was given a job and successful workers were moved into

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Despite the way the workers were treated, Stalin still managed to industrialise Russia from the low economy it was, this made Stalin look like a great man. Stalin used monstrous acts to industrialise Russia and take control of the Soviet Union.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    This is why the Five Year Plans was the spot on policy to intensify the country's economy. The main reason for this is most workers were laid back, untrained and uneducated living in a country which was as backward as it was a hundred years earlier.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    This is because he eliminated many of the military officers during the purges, rejected the massive information warning of the German attack in June 1941 and did nothing to bolster borders. Moreover his prohibition of strategic withdrawal in the summer of 1941 led to the capture of hundreds of thousands of Red Army men.

  1. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    * Women had been particularly hard hit by the NEP. Many had been forced to move from skilled to unskilled work. So large numbers of jobless, unsupported women ended up on the streets. * Housing was still a major problem and most workers lived in overcrowded, poor-quality houses and flats.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    In the meantime, the workers' state was forced to bide its time, maintain private industry under workers' control, and rely to a large extent on the old state bureaucracy to run the state apparatus. This could be maintained, it was hoped, until help came from the workers in the West.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    people and thus he uses this to reinstate that he was not an oppressor, but was a true communist. Reading the source it is clear that there is ambiguity and a double meaning behind it and could be referred to an allegory where moral and conscience issues are embedded deep into the source.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    I am totally sure that the purpose of this source was to undermine Stalin, in one way or the other. 4: Study Sources G and H. Do you trust Khrushchev�s assements of Stalin? Use your own knwledge of Stalin to explain your answer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work