• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations by 1929.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was the League of Nations by 1929 By 1929, the League was not in clear success or failure. At sometimes the league looked like it was the answer to all world problems and at other times it looked like "a victor's club". The league passed through many situations which shaped its success and failures: * The Economic recovery of countries had reduced international tension so countries were less likely to fight. * However, the Wall Street crash and economic problems ended this and tension rose again. * Britain had a High unemployment rate and so didn't want to sort out other problems when it had enough at home. * Germany's Unemployment and poverty also was a problem and later led on to Nazis being elected. * USA was unwilling to support sanctions when its own trade is a mess. * Japan's Depression leads it to take over Manchuria (part of China). In view of the League's desire to end war, the only criteria that can be used to classify a success, was whether war was avoided and a peaceful settlement formulated after a crisis between two nations. The League experienced success in: Upper Silesia (1921) The Treaty of Versailles had given the people of Upper Silesia the right to have a referendum on whether they wanted to be part of Germany or part of Poland. ...read more.

Middle

The league helped in: * 400,000 Prisoners of War repatriated * Turkish refugee camps helped (1922) * Work against leprosy (extermination of mosquitoes) * Attacks on slave owners in Sierra Leone and Burma; Freed 200,000 slaves in Sierra Leone. * ILO (international labour organisation) successful in: Limiting children's working hours. Banning white lead from paint. Campaigning for improved working conditions. * Recommended marking shipping lanes. * Produced international Highway Code. * Challenged forced labour for railway building in Africa. After stating the success, the failures should be discussed to determine how successful the League was. Article 11 of the League's Covenant stated: "Any war of threat of war is a matter of concern to the whole League and the League shall take action that may safe guard peace." Therefore, any conflict between nations which ended in war and the victor of one over the other must be considered a League failure. Activity outside the League of Nations This is a sign that most countries relied, not on the League, but on separate treaties to keep them safe: * During the 1920s a number of international agreements were reached, mostly outside the League of Nations. * The two most important of these were the Locarno Treaties and the Kellogg-Brand Pact. The Locarno Treaties were signed in 1925. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I would finish by measuring the League of Nations against its aims: * to stop war * to improve people's lives and jobs * to get disarmament * To enforce the Treaty of Versailles (oh yes - what about appeasement? German disarmament? Rhineland? Anschluss? reparations? TOTAL failure here, i think!) The first point was a total failure. WW2 broke out and one of Hitler's aims was to destroy the treaty of Versailles which was what the league was trying to impose. The league did succeed quite well in the second point were it did help with social issues as mentioned before. This was one good thing the league done. The third point was also a totally failure. Treaties were signed to limit armies, (the Washington conference), which was totally contradicting the league. The league said "disarmament" which meant NO armies. The fourth point was also a failure. The treaty of Versailles included the appeasement, German disarmament, Rhineland, Anschluss, and reparations. None of these was not subject to a change. All were tampered with n twisted to suit the strong countries that were looking for their own gain. I conclude by saying the League of Nations was quite a failure by 1929, apart from the social successes which were quite good. Maryam Ali ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This was a very harsh treaty. Why was Turkey treated this way ? Memories were still clear to many people on the Allied side of what had happened at Gallipoli when the ANZACS suffered appalling losses at the hands of the Turks in what was one of the the Allies greatest defeat of World War One.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    However, in the Abyssinian crisis they didn't condemn Italy in fact they came to an agreement with them that basically gave them what they wanted. So they were seen to be giving into the demands of the aggressor. Not only did they give into Italy but the two main powers

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    But not all people's troubles were solved, as the world was too big to be able to solve all the problems. For example there were still many areas where the drug trade and prostitution were still common. Also certain schemes were not compulsory.

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    The next big failure of the League of Nations was over disarmament. The league had not had any success in this area in the 1920's either, but at that stage when the international climate was much better it had seemed not to matter as much.

  1. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    "The league council...could do little more than urge the allied body to bring the matter to a close"15 In 1931 Japan controlled most of the economy of Manchuria. It owned the important mines, railroads, factories and ports. It kept a large army in the port city of Kwantung to protect these assets.

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    Churchill convinced the government that the plan would work whereas it got little support from the Armed Forces, this could have lead to poor command because commanders started to see that the plan would not work. If the commanders were not as ignorant towards the lower ranks, then less soldiers

  1. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Several factors and events led to this downfall:-The Manchurian Crisis (1931-33): The Japanese invaded Manchuria. The Great Depression following the Wall Street Crisis hit Japan badly. Its government could not meet the demands of its growing population as most of its products were imported due to the fact that most

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    even though the Treaty of Versailles limited Germany?s army to 100,000 men and banned conscription. However, Britain, France and Italy did not take any actions against Germany. This was the first clear sign of the policy of appeasement being used by the League towards Germany. The Remilitarisation of Rhineland (1936)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work