• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s

Extracts from this document...


How Successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s When it was set up the LN had four main objectives, these were : to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate, especially in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm and to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world. I will show how successful the LN was in each of its objectives. To improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world was one of the objectives of the LN. I believe the LN was quite successful in doing this. The LN did amazing work in getting war refugees back to their homeland. ...read more.


In my opinion the LN did an amazing amount of work to improve life all around and was very successful in doing this. To discourage aggression from any nation was another of the LN's objectives. They had some successes with this and the disputes were mainly caused by border disputes. 1. One of the successes was in Upper Silesia in 1921. This was when Germany and Poland both wanted control over it. The League came up with a good plan that split the area in two, a war was avoided. 2. Aaland Islands was another success, Finland and Sweden both wanted the Aaland Islands. The League carefully decided that the islands go to Finland. ...read more.


In 1923 the first attempt to disarm was accepted by many nations but Britain didn't agree due to their own interests. In 1926 plans for disarmament conference was set up but it took a long time to come up with these agreements and when they finally did Germany said no because of the new Nazi elected government in Germany. This was a complete failure and nobody took the big step to wards disarmament. My conclusion is that the LN was fairly successful in the 1920s. They were very successful in improving the lives of people. They were fairly successful in discouraging aggression but however they had a complete failure in trying to make all countries head towards disarmament Anthony Tawil 10DR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The League of Nations in the 1920's - Success or Failure?

    The League did not act upon this whatsoever. The occupation ended in 1924 when the invader nations left on their own will. The reason why the League was powerless on this matter was because it needed French support, and by trying to interfere in this matter, they would have lost it.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The economic sanctions are almost useless without America this is because they were the worlds leading trading nation so if the League of Nations would not trade with a country then they would just trade with America instead. The Military sanctions will also be jeopardised, as the American army was

  1. How successful was the League of Nations by 1929.

    Washington Treaty, 1921 USA< Japan, Britain, and France agreed to limit size of navies. Japan's army was limited to 3/5 of USA and British army. This allowed a Japanese naval build up, but at the time was seen as a positive step to maintain peace.

  2. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    These are vital to modern warfare. So ineffectual were the sanctions that Italy was able to complete the conquest of Abyssinia by May 1936. A few weeks later sanctions were abandoned and Mussolini had disregarded the League. Britain and France had not wanted to antagonise Mussolini and had even tried to form a covert deal with

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    abolishing slavery and helping refugees. Although events like the crises in Abyssinia and Manchuria and the failure of the disarmament conference contributed in a great deal to the failure of the League it was probably the 'design weakness' of the league that led to its overall failure.

  2. How successful was the league in the 1920's and 1930's?

    The league gave Germany half of the land and population and Poland received most of the industry. Neither side was completely satisfied but the league did its best as it could and handled the complicated situation well. Both countries accepted the decision of the league and sax the league as an authority and help.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The Bulgarians appealed to the league for help. The league condemned the Greek action and ordered it to pull out and pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with this moral condemnation, it yielded. This shows how the league's strategy of moral condemnation was working successfully.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    There was a dispute in December 1934, between Italian and Ethiopian soldiers at an oasis in Abyssinia. Mussolini then claimed that it was actually Italian territory. He then demanded an apology and prepared the army for an invasion. The Abyssinian emperor Haile Selassie appealed to the League for support.In between

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work