• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s When it was set up the LN had four main objectives, these were : to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate, especially in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm and to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world. I will show how successful the LN was in each of its objectives. To improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world was one of the objectives of the LN. I believe the LN was quite successful in doing this. The LN did amazing work in getting war refugees back to their homeland. ...read more.

Middle

In my opinion the LN did an amazing amount of work to improve life all around and was very successful in doing this. To discourage aggression from any nation was another of the LN's objectives. They had some successes with this and the disputes were mainly caused by border disputes. 1. One of the successes was in Upper Silesia in 1921. This was when Germany and Poland both wanted control over it. The League came up with a good plan that split the area in two, a war was avoided. 2. Aaland Islands was another success, Finland and Sweden both wanted the Aaland Islands. The League carefully decided that the islands go to Finland. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1923 the first attempt to disarm was accepted by many nations but Britain didn't agree due to their own interests. In 1926 plans for disarmament conference was set up but it took a long time to come up with these agreements and when they finally did Germany said no because of the new Nazi elected government in Germany. This was a complete failure and nobody took the big step to wards disarmament. My conclusion is that the LN was fairly successful in the 1920s. They were very successful in improving the lives of people. They were fairly successful in discouraging aggression but however they had a complete failure in trying to make all countries head towards disarmament Anthony Tawil 10DR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The economic sanctions are almost useless without America this is because they were the worlds leading trading nation so if the League of Nations would not trade with a country then they would just trade with America instead. The Military sanctions will also be jeopardised, as the American army was

  2. How successful was the league in the 1920's and 1930's?

    Mussolini demanded compensation from the Greek government. When the Greek government refuses, Mussolini attacked and occupied the island of Corfu. This was a perfect opportunity for the league to fulfill their policy. Italy was a prominent member of the league and a great power of the league.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    But it wasn't just border disputes the league had success with. They were also successful in making social and industrial improvements. The league did tremendous work to get refugees and former prisoners of war, back to their home countries. It is estimated that in just the first few years after

  2. Was the League of Nations a Success in the 1920's?

    Signed by USA, Britain, Japan and other countries. There were three different treaties; these were called the Washington Treaties. The first treaty was to respect each other's possessions; the next one was to leave China alone and a naval ratio 5:5:3.

  1. The League of Nations was a Great Success in the 1920's. Nobody could have ...

    However aggression was discouraged over the Aaland Islands, 1921. Both Sweden and Finland wanted control over the Aaland Islands which were midway between each country. Both countries were threatening to fight for the Islands. Both countries appealed to the league, after studying the matter closely, the league said the islands should go to Finland.

  2. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    It is significant to note that none of the settled disputes went against a major power which may have challenged the League's decision. This illustrates how successful the League actually was. The League of Nations was also quick to prove its value by settling the Swedish-Finnish dispute over the sovereignty of the Aaland Islands (1920-21).

  1. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Mussolini wanted revenge for this humiliation. He also had his on the fertile lands and mineral wealth of the region. Most importantly, he wanted conquest and glory. His style of leadership required military victories, and he had often mentioned restoring the Roman Empire.

  2. To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920s?

    The League also wanted to ?Encourage nations to disarm? in the hope that countries would choose to settle disputes peacefully instead of resorting to violence. The league largely failed in bringing around disarmament because many countries were not prepared to give up their own armies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work