• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Successful Was The League of Nations in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...


How Successful Was The League of Nations in the 1920s? The League of Nations was a post World War 1 'project' that was the spawn of President Wilson's imagination in the 14 points that he took to the Treaty of Versailles. Its original main aims were; * To be strong and united enough to discourage any nation from using force as a way to solve disputes. * To encourage nations to disarm. * To encourage nations to cooperate. * To uphold the Treaty of Versailles. * To improve living and working conditions for people around the world. * To provide a place do discuss international disputes and work them out peacefully. The League was successful on numerous occasions, helping to sort out disputes and help countries through hard times. ...read more.


However the League was not successful on an equal number of times, failing to stop wars, being ignored by nations or ignoring nations themselves. The League was ignored by France in 1923 after Germany had failed to pay its reparations and France took the matter into her own hands. She invaded Germany's industrial region the Ruhr to steal its produce as a replacement for the money. On one occasion Poland seized Vilna from Lithuania because it had a large Polish population. Lithuania went to the League for help but it was in vain as the League did nothing in its aid. Possibly the worst failure of the League was in1923 when some Italian soldiers were killed in Greece; the new Italian Dictator Mussolini wanted to prove himself and demanded 50 million lire as compensation from Greece. ...read more.


Danube 1927 * Greece moving out of Bulgaria * Helping in stopping spread of disease & improving working conditions. * France invading the Ruhr * Italy bombarding Corfu * Poland seizing Vilna Even though this is only a sample of the things that the League did they are the main items. My conclusion is that the League was a good idea but wasn't any more successful than it was a failure. As you can see the League did have twice as many successes than failures but I think you'll agree that the 3 failures are much bigger than some of the successes as they are nations invading each other or going to war. I think that it was a good idea all the same because it's better having 50% successes than 100% failures in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s

    The League was fairly successful in preventing aggression but did not maintain success in doing this. To encourage nations to disarm was a very important aim of the League, they started out well and their intentions were good but failed to actually bring about disarmament.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    One of the main reasons the League of Nations failed was the fact that the USA was not a member of the League. The main problem with the absence of America was the implementation of the 'three stages'. The Moral condemnation would be less effective as the countries would feel less threatened without the presence of America.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations by 1929.

    There was nothing to say about what would happen if someone did declare war. This was looked on as a turning point in History and people thought the world was getting a safer place. Locarno Treaties (1925) Germany agreed borders with France and Belgium as in the Treaty of Versailles (but nothing on Eastern borders).

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    There would also be a lot more unemployment in Germany. This meant less tax payers which would not contribute to the reparations that Germany had to pay. The government may also have to raise the taxes making the government less popular with the people.

  2. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    The League decided to partition the area between the two countries. The League's decision "provided the basis for a peace in Eastern Europe"10. Greek troops invaded Bulgaria in 1925 after some shooting incidents on the frontier. The League swiftly intervened and prevented the outbreak of war in the Balkans, showing "how effective in such situations [the League] could be"11.

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    Britain and France did not take the situation seriously and did not want to upset Mussolini, as he seemed to their strongest ally against Hitler. Eventually Italy was given a moral sanction as everyone thought that they had done wrong.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    of Nations.The Locarno agreements were greeted very enthusiastically, especially by France, for Germany had shown more goodwill to it than ever before. This pave the way for Germany to join the League in 1926, leaving the Soviet Union as the only major power not in the League.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work