• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Successful Was The League of Nations in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...


How Successful Was The League of Nations in the 1920s? The League of Nations was a post World War 1 'project' that was the spawn of President Wilson's imagination in the 14 points that he took to the Treaty of Versailles. Its original main aims were; * To be strong and united enough to discourage any nation from using force as a way to solve disputes. * To encourage nations to disarm. * To encourage nations to cooperate. * To uphold the Treaty of Versailles. * To improve living and working conditions for people around the world. * To provide a place do discuss international disputes and work them out peacefully. The League was successful on numerous occasions, helping to sort out disputes and help countries through hard times. ...read more.


However the League was not successful on an equal number of times, failing to stop wars, being ignored by nations or ignoring nations themselves. The League was ignored by France in 1923 after Germany had failed to pay its reparations and France took the matter into her own hands. She invaded Germany's industrial region the Ruhr to steal its produce as a replacement for the money. On one occasion Poland seized Vilna from Lithuania because it had a large Polish population. Lithuania went to the League for help but it was in vain as the League did nothing in its aid. Possibly the worst failure of the League was in1923 when some Italian soldiers were killed in Greece; the new Italian Dictator Mussolini wanted to prove himself and demanded 50 million lire as compensation from Greece. ...read more.


Danube 1927 * Greece moving out of Bulgaria * Helping in stopping spread of disease & improving working conditions. * France invading the Ruhr * Italy bombarding Corfu * Poland seizing Vilna Even though this is only a sample of the things that the League did they are the main items. My conclusion is that the League was a good idea but wasn't any more successful than it was a failure. As you can see the League did have twice as many successes than failures but I think you'll agree that the 3 failures are much bigger than some of the successes as they are nations invading each other or going to war. I think that it was a good idea all the same because it's better having 50% successes than 100% failures in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    One of the main reasons the League of Nations failed was the fact that the USA was not a member of the League. The main problem with the absence of America was the implementation of the 'three stages'. The Moral condemnation would be less effective as the countries would feel less threatened without the presence of America.

  2. How successful was the league in the 1920's and 1930's?

    repute diplomatically, but it was to on use and in 1923 Poland occupied Vilna. The leagues passive response sent a clear message around the world and set a precedent future. Corfu (1923) Five Italians working for the league in Greece were killed.


    Following the case of Samos, the relationship between Athens and her allies become strained and hostile. The five-year peace treaty between Athens and Sparta was threatened with corruption as the allies began to complain of the bad treatment that they were being dealt with by the Athenians.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    Therefore mostly defeating the object of economic sanctions as the US was the biggest trading country. The league was to closely related to the Treaty of Versailles and other treaties which were unfair and which many people hated. This was also an important factor in the decision of the US to stay out of the League.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The Bulgarians appealed to the league for help. The league condemned the Greek action and ordered it to pull out and pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with this moral condemnation, it yielded. This shows how the league's strategy of moral condemnation was working successfully.

  1. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    borders with France and Belgium that had been laid out in the Treaty of Versailles. Both Britain and Italy guaranteed to protect France should Germany violate these borders. -Germany accepted that the Rhineland was to remain a demilitarized zone. -France and Germany agreed to settle future disputes through the League

  2. To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920s?

    In the end the League did nothing and Poland kept Vilna. This shows how weak the League truly was as they couldn?t force countries to follow their rulings and it was easy for Poland to just say no.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work