• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was the League of Nations up to 1929?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was the League of Nations up to 1929? The League of Nations was an international organization, established by the Treaty of Versailles (signed on the 28th June, 1919) that ended World War I. It was set up in 1920 at the Paris peace conference and, like its successor, the United Nations, its purpose was the "promotion of international peace and security". Member countries would try and settle their disputes by talking rather than fighting. If talks between nations broke down, they were to go to the League to settle their differences. The League was a product of World War I as that the conflict convinced most people of the necessity of averting another tragedy. The League was built upon Woodrow Wilson's 14th point (a provision for "a general association of nations ... under specific covenants.") and it was the American president who had the greatest role in setting it up. Though the president campaigned for the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles personally, the US Senate ultimately rejected the treaty. This was mostly due to the America's strong belief in isolationism, which precluded its participation in the League. This was disastrous for Britain and France as America was the prime economic and biggest potential military power. It also perhaps set the League up as weak from the beginning as it did not include the world's biggest power. The League also did not include any of the defeated powers: Germany, Bulgaria, Turkey, Austria and Hungary, as they were not allowed to join until later as punishment for their role in the war. ...read more.


These included the Washington Naval Treaties (1921), Locarno Treaties (1925) and the Kellog-Briand Pact (1928). Overall, the League's successes were simple and primarily involved border disputes as a result of the end of war treaties. This was simply repairing the aftermath of war and addressing social and humanitarian issues that all countries wished resolved. Therefore the League was able to carry out the work with relative ease. The successes met the following aim: to improve people's lives and jobs. To some extent The League did increase international co-operation through the various treaties signed. Though I feel it was more to do with the foreign ministers (Austin Chamberlain, Briand and Stresemann) and the countries themselves through "power diplomacy" rather then the League. Though the League did settle some conflicts, it also made unpopular decisions (in the Upper Silesia conflict the German population were denied NSD). Perhaps the only reason the weaker countries did not argue with the League was because of their poor economic situations because of the war. No one really wanted to start fighting again and this did not really show that the League could keep peace rather that no could fight back. Though it can be argued that disarmament was also addressed with the Washington Naval Treaties it was only one small step towards the aim of multilateral disarmament and was in fact organised by the USA not the League of Nations, though they were present. All other chances for disarmament (e.g. 1923 - The Draft Treaty of Mutual Assistance and in 1924 - The Geneva Protocol) ...read more.


They were also unwilling to use their armies as they had just finished fighting a world war. The tension caused by the Treaty of Versailles and the other end of war treaties, and the exclusion of the defeated powers, meant that the League was not respected by all. There was also tension between the Leagues' major powers as Britain and France did not trust each other and often disagreed, and Italy and Japan were upset about the Treaty of Versailles. The League was possibly weak from the start, especially without America, and its organisational system meant that it took too long for major decisions to be made. As a result, other countries saw that the League was weak and had no power and influence. The major powers saw that if they wanted something, the Leagues "weapons" of sanctions were ineffective and its condemnation insufficient, particularly without the USA. It was also pointless to use violence to stop violence. It is therefore not surprising; that the league did have some failures and that dictators were able to come to power. It was however; the first international organisation of any sort attempted and was bound to have problems at the start. Though the League did eventually disband it did lead to the formation and growth of other formal international organizations such as the Red Cross, Hague Conferences and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. These in turn led to significant improvements in international co-operation, and the eventual formation of the United Nations (in June of 1945) based on the League, still in existence today. Katie Taylor 11H October 5th, 03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    By 1931 Japan controlled most of Manchuria's economy. The great depression had caused Japan like the rest of the world, much hardship. Many factories were closed; people were left homeless and unemployed. The Japanese army officers got impatient, they thought that the ideal way of helping the Japanese out of

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    When Mussolini attacked Abyssinia, the League of Nations was prompt to act and, condemning Mussolini's actions, decided to implement economic sanctions on Italy. These sanctions had little effect since Italy still had access to steel, copper and oil, all of which are valuable goods during times of military activity.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    The countries would not disarm if other countries around them wouldn't. An example of the League of Nations failure on disarmament is that they tried to organise a conference on disarmament. It took them five years to even agree what it was about and when it did meet it achieved nothing.

  2. The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles in Addressing the Causes of ...

    Although it was probably affordable to Germany, many Germans disagreed and blamed this clause for the great economic depression in 1929. This created an atmosphere of anger and aggression towards the foreign policy. They held the belief that they had nothing much to lose and started to lean towards a more extreme political stance.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations by 1929.

    They had traditionally belonged to Finland but most of the islanders wanted to be governed by Sweden. Neither Sweden nor Finland could come to a decision as to who owned the islands and in 1921 they asked the League to adjudicate.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Therefore, throughout the 1920's, in nearly all parts of the Treaty, the terms were carried out. It was after 1933, that there was a systematic breaking of the terms when the Nazis came to power. The other peace settlements It is often forgotten, that with the energy put into the

  1. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    Greek troops were withdrawn and damages paid to Bulgaria. Turkey claimed the province of Mosul which was part of the British mandate of Iraq. The League ruled in favour of Iraq and therefore Britain, and although it played a somewhat "subsidiary role...it served as the channel through which a settlement was reached"12.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    The Kellogg-Briand Pact: The Kellogg-Briand Pact marked the high point of international relations in the 1920s, the terms being: -The parties were to condemn war as a means of solving international disputes and reject it as an instrument of policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work