• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his reign?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his reign? Alexander 2nd succeeded his father, Nicholas 1st, to the Russian throne in 1855, at the age of 36. There was a great amount of unrest in Russia at this time, mainly because of the defeat of the Crimean War, and so it was clear that major changes had to be made in order to recover. The Crimean War showed the weaknesses in the Russian Army, with its lack of equipment and supplies, over worked soldiers and inadequate officers. There was only 1 musket for every 2 soldiers, and only 4% of the Russian troops equipped with the newest long- range riffles, which was an amazingly small amount compared to the French 33% and the British troops at 50%. The soldiers that fought for Russia were mostly Serfs, this was because they were easier to control, able to pay them less for their work, contributed to over 80% of the population and most of all in the eyes of the Nobles their lives were worth less than their own. ...read more.


The workers were often paid in clothes or food, instead of money, and many had to result in living on the factory floors, because they could not afford to stay anywhere else. The conditions in which they suffered could not be opposed, because strikes were prohibited, and there were often heavy fines if employee's work was not up to a certain standard. There was not much done to improve farming, and so there remained a low agricultural output. Because of these unsuccessful, or none existent, improvements to the economy, there still was still an absence of middle class, leaving only the nobles and the peasants, which seemed to divide the country enormously. The problem with communication was largely improved, by the construction of many railway tracks and trains. The overall mileage was increased from 660 at the beginning of his reign, to 14,000 by the end. These new railways not only allowed people in Russia to travel more easily, but also allowed goods to, which meant that more trade could take place. This new trade dramatically boosted the Russian economy, by the capital from Western countries, which now found it easy to get into to Russia. ...read more.


His actions did not succeed in the long term, mainly because he was such a firm believer in Autocratic ruling, and so did not want to give up a threaten his power in any way. After Alexander 2nd died in 1881, it is clear to see that not much really changed. The Duma, which was the government set up, was abolished, and so there was still no middle class. The peasants were still in a great sense of unrest, because although they were technically given their freedom, they were still controlled and tied to the land by the landowners. Because of all this, the industries, both urban and rural, did not improve, and so there was still a very backwards economy, which even the construction of new railways could not fix. In conclusion it is clear to see that Tsar Alexander 2nd did confront and try and mend the problems facing Russia, but as there was great unrest in Russia, the problems had to be dealt with quickly. There for he was successful in the short term, but although it was a stepping- stone in the right direction, it was not so successful in the long term. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    Russia's backward economic system was something Alexander knew he had to change, and this would need reform: Russia was undeniably economically backward in comparison with every other great power. However, he wanted to modernize without losing his autonomous position, therefore knew he had to handle reforms like emancipation, with care and balance.

  2. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    On the other hand Russia was the world's greatest producer of pig iron by 1855, conversely this merely shows the backwardness of Russia as pig iron was a raw material and Russia didn't even have the means to turn it into finished iron.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    the development of industry leading to an enormous strengthening of the proletariat at the expense of the peasantry and middle layers of society. In the USSR, however, the process ("proletarianisation") had been carried to unheard-of lengths, with the concentration of the workforce into gigantic industrial enterprises of 100,000 or more.

  2. To what extent did the emancipation of the serfs in Russiain 1861 improve the ...

    On one hand there is a lot of evidence showing that the serfs lives improved significantly. The peasants would be considered free citizens. They would be free to marry who ever they chose to, own their own property, take legal action, engage in trade or business and, maybe most importantly, could no longer be bought or sold.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    He tackled the problem by ordering all America's banks to close and to remain closed until government officials had inspected them. Within a few days, 5000 banks that were deemed trustworthy were allowed to re-open. If necessary, they were given Government money to help them.

  2. Tsar Problems

    The Church brainwashed people into believing that the Tsar was chosen by God and he was supposed to be the ruler of Russia and that he should rule as an autocrat.

  1. 'Only Alexander II's policies made significant progress in avoiding revolution in Russia.' How valid ...

    government Alexander II did not make significant progress in avoiding a revolution, his reforms angering the Slavophiles and encouraging revolutionaries that a revolution was possible. It seems the conclusion of events has to be that if Alexander had made no changes to the system when he came into power, serfdom,

  2. Were Was it the length of World War I that destroyed the Reign of ...

    Ironically Germany was one the countries the Russians were at war with and this just happened to be the homeland of the one person single-handedly running the country, the Tsarina; Ironic still was the fact that the great dislike of her was just about the only thing every Russian had agreed on at the time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work