• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful were Stalin's Economic Policies? Stalin's economic policies can be seen as a significant success, because they achieved their overall goals of modernising and improving Russia as quickly as possible, in order to catch up and compete with the other European powers and America. The first of the Economic policies are the Five Year Plans. Stalin's main ideas were to electrify Russia and increase mining of natural resources and developing steel industry. The tasks were split up into three plans, each lasting five years. The first Five Year Plan centred on laying the foundations in Russia to enable it to cope with the rapid industrialisation - the focus was developing and expanding the heavy industries such as building huge new steel mills and hydroelectric dams to cover new industrial cities' power requirements. The second Five Year Plan saw heavy industry still being a priority, but the focal point shifting to other areas as well, such as mining for coal, lead, tin and zinc. Also, transport and communications were boosted as new railways and canals were built - the most famous example of this being the Moscow Underground, as well as agriculture being made more efficient by a dramatic increase of tractors and farm machinery. ...read more.

Middle

Collectivisation was not so successful in terms of increasing production and boosting Russia's economy, certainly the economic results were not as impressive as those achieved by the Five Year Plans. For instance as a result of collectivisation grain production increased from 36 million tons in 1921 to 95 million tons in 1940, but this was only just over pre-Revolution figures for grain - 86 million tons in 1913, so there wasn't much of an improvement. And though collectivisation was meant to boost food levels in order to combat food shortages, in actual fact it did the opposite, and widespread famines swept the countryside - seven million peasants starved in a famine between 1932 and 1933. As well as this, although the number of pigs increased from 20 million in 1928 to 29 million in 1940, most other animal numbers decreased dramatically. For instance between 1928 and 1934 the cattle population declined from 66.8 million to 35.5 million. The reason the country's economy and people suffered so much was a result of dekulakisation, a main part of collectivisation. Stalin attempted to 'equalise' the peasant population by getting rid of the rich peasants, but what he unwittingly did was clear the countryside of the most efficient and hardworking peasants, leaving the severely depleted numbers of peasants to do the same amount of work as the entire population had done previously. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, peasants were encouraged to denounce others as kulaks, and children were encouraged to inform on anybody, even their own parents. People got used to people killing and dying all around them, and had no trust in their neighbours, which was not what dekulakisation was intended to do. In conclusion, Stalin's economic policies can be seen as significantly successful from his point of view, because he achieved his economic and political goals of industrialising and modernising Russia so it can compete with other industrial powers such as Britain, France and America, and introducing Communist ideas and ways of life in the process. In the long term the Five Year Plans and Collectivisation were substantially successful, because they laid the foundations for a great country, and in the medium term they were considerably successful because they enabled Russia to not be defeated by Germany in World War Two - if they had stretched them out longer than fifteen years, Russia wouldn't have been able to cope with a war and would probably have been defeated. However in the short term Stalin's economic policies were not so successful for the people of Russia, because they inflicted huge misery, loss of life and terrible working and living conditions on them. Collectivisation in particular solved a few problems with efficiency, but eventually the benefits were cancelled out by the huge problems of famine, fear and a general breakdown of society brought about by dekulakisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    These people were put on trial as they thought they had a plan against the Communist regime. The Five-Year Plans really did make Russia a much stronger country. Not only did the Five-Year Pans allow its economy to raise and allow the people of Russia to have their own money,

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Khrushchev states: 'Stalin's brand of collectivisation brought nothing but brutality and misery'. This source is a quote from Khrushchev after Stalin's death. This is a source of good utility and reliability as it is said by Khrushchev after Stalin's death when he was in power so he could say what

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    Stalin also incorporated a transformation of Russian agriculture in the aim of his Five Year Plans. A policy of collectivisation was pursued in order to replace private agriculture with collective and state farms as Stalin did not believe that Russia's socialized industry could rely on an agricultural base provided by small peasant farming.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    way overshadows the effort of the workers under his own personal splendour as his figure was enlarged in the poster so he looks above anyone else to blatantly convey that "Stalin is behind everything" and that all the country's workers respect him and follow his ambitious orders.

  1. To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

    Stalin on deliberately allowed this disaster to go on. Stalin wanted to go to war with the Japanese do he wanted to build stocks to feed the red army and keep their strength up.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    "If someone speaks better than he does, that man is for it! Stalin will not let him live." Trotsky was a threat to his position so Stalin accused him of disloyalty and expelled from the Party. Stalin was extremely paranoid and although Trotsky was expelled from the USSR he still thought Trotsky was planning another revolution.

  1. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    Since Russia's retreat from World War One, none of the allies would trade with Russia, so she needed to be self-sufficient enough to make her own weaponry. Although Russia needed to speed up the rate of industrialization, the rate that Stalin demanded was almost impossible and could not have been done without the near slave labor of the Russian citizens.

  2. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    of Russian industry was increased by some amount and farmers were given tractors and other heavy machinery to help them produce crops. Although all these things would have brought glory to Stalin as a result, they did still help Russia a lot in terms of its economy and place in the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work