• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How true is it that industrialisation in Stalin's Russia wasachieved only at the expense of the Russian people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How true is it that industrialisation in Stalin's Russia was achieved only at the expense of the Russian people? Industrialisation was a big part of Stalin's Russia. It was a chance for Russia to catch up with the rest of Europe. Previous to Stalin, Lenin's 'New Economic Policy' was a way in which peasants could sell surplus grain and possibly livestock, also small factories could sell goods on the open market. Lenin had to push peasants to grow more in order for there to be any livestock - it work. A slow, but rising intake. At the end of the 1920's Stalin cast aside the NEP and introduced the Five-Year Plans for industry and agriculture. These plans had to be done quickly, in order to pull alongside with the success that other countries had maintained in the last years. Collectivisation was the first step. Agriculture needed to developed, so that famine could be overcome and there would be strong workers for the development of industrialisation. Collectivisation was a plan to 'collect' peasant farms together, therefore, growing surplus grain to give to the state. ...read more.

Middle

Rewards were given to hard workers and those, including people who turned up to work late or were ill, etc, would be seen as corrupt and sent away. Magnitogorsk was a cit, built from scratch, to show the Russian people what life would be live if they helped in this revolution to make Russia better. Punishment for those who didn't work together could have been humiliated in front of their fellow colleagues, fined or sent to a labour camp. Nearly a quarter of a million people migrated to the city of Magnitogorsk during the First Five Year Plans. However, the plans in the First Five Years, did not include any intention of raising living standards, its purpose was to be collective, not individual. This meant that Russians had to live in poor overcrowded conditions, during very bad periods of famine. Nothing to do, but go to work and come back to your corner of a room, which also occupies a large family, without any staple food. The Five Year Plans were to bring great things to the Russian people, when in reality; it didn't do much in the long-term. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1938, in the city of Stalingrad, a city with a population of 1/2 million, had no sewage system. With all this, industrialisation increased and production was on the up. During the First Five Year Plans, machinery output up 4.5%, electricity output up 2.5% and 1,500 new industrial plants. Compared to 1914, production of steel went from 4.8 million tons to 4.0 million in 1928 then increased to 5.9 in 1933. But was all this achieved only at the expense of the Russian people? What did they get out of it? Famines were always lurking about and work and housing conditions were appalling. Nothing got better until the Second Five Year Plans, and even then it wasn't great change. By the time the Third Five Year Plans kicked in, war was upon the Russians. They couldn't reap the benefits that industrialisation. Many people starved, many sent to labour camps. Industrialisation couldn't have happened without them, there is no doubt about it. However, it needn't have at the expense of some many others. There should have been individual, as well as collective, ways to better Russia. There was no sign of any attempts of improved housing or ways to overcome famine. Stalin put up the efforts of the Russian people ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    I think that the only real way to inspire a nation to work like they did during the five-year plans is to make someone a figure to look up to, to raise morale. In this case it was Stalin. As Russia moves into the 21st century, material such as coal and iron rose dramatically.

  2. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    With this title came better housing, free holidays and cash prizes. Any worker in their right mind would most definitely want to have these privileges for both themselves and their families. However, some people did not like these Stakhanovites as they increased the amount of work each worker had to achieve in a day's work.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    of anti Soviet activities and were either executed or sent to labour camps. Trotsky soon followed the list by getting executed by Stalin's agents in Mexico. However, Stalin did not stop there he continued this Great Purge by removing 25,000 officers and many university lecturers and teachers, miners and engineers, factory managers and ordinary workers also disappeared.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    vast amounts of money in training centres of universities as well in the world of work and the fact that it was estimated by statisticians that there were more doctors per head population in the developing Russia than the already developed Britain.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    the foreground, whereas in the second photograph, both Trotsky and Kamenev have been removed. In this photograph, Stalin is portrayed as a man and not as a monster. Source D is an anecdote, which was written by Stalin in 1945.

  2. five year plans in russia

    Not only that, these factories would be able to change their products into war machinery. Tanks, weapons and aeroplanes could be produced at these factories. The large supplies of iron and steel, for example, which would otherwise have been used to make machinery meant for agricultural uses, could then be used for war machinery.

  1. The impact Stalin had on the Russian People in agriculture and industry.

    The Kulaks were divided into three different classes; 1. 'Actively hostile'. 2. The wealthiest Kulak households. 3. Least harmful of the Kulaks. The property of the first two categories were confiscated and given to the local Kolkhoz. In total about 300, 000 Kulak families were deported from their homes; roughly 1.5 million people.

  2. In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on ...

    After recovering from this incident, Stalin first joined forces with the Rightists who were Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky (who wanted to continue Lenin's New Economic Policy) to get rid of Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev, who were the Left Opposition (they didn't want to continue the NEP but wanted to industrialize Russia to make it stronger).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work