• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Halligan History Coursework Part B How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941? From the 1920's onwards, Stalin set the stage for gaining absolute power, through a number of campaigns of repression against groups which opposed the Communist Party and Stalin himself. The use of terror became a central part to Stalin's rule during the 1930's with the launching of The Great Purges against opposition to Stalin. It can be seen that Stalin did effectively remove opposition to the exercise of his personal power until 1941 when Germany invaded Russia. The term 'purge' in Soviet political slang was an abbreviation of the expression 'purge of the party ranks.' However, Stalin's terror changed its meaning to almost certain arrest, imprisonment or even execution. It is important to realise that purges in themselves were common throughout Soviet government. The Communists seized power without any real popular support and as a consequence, had to use fear and violence to maintain their position in power. There are many similarities between Stalin's terror and the terror before his rule. During the 1920's there was the banning of other political parties as well as the killing of hostages which pre-dated the same acts which took place during Stalin's reign. ...read more.

Middle

It is true that many of the initial victims of the terror were Old Bolsheviks with independent minds and who did not owe their position to Stalin. Purging this opposition allowed Stalin to bring in new loyal members who obeyed him and thus protected the exercise of his personal power. The purges could also have been motivated by Stalin's paranoia. Evidence suggests Stalin saw opposition everywhere and he told Khrushchev "I trust nobody, not even myself". Also Khrushchev stated that Stalin had "committed his excesses to boost and guarantee his own security, the continuation of his supremacy and the supremacy of his policies within the Soviet Union." Another possible reason for The Terror was because of a genuine fear of impending war from fascist Germany. This made the leaders think it necessary to remove any opposition that would be able to criticise Stalin's handling of any war that could occur. The event which triggered The Great Purges was the murder of Kirov in 1934. It was after the 17th Party Congress in 1934 that Kirov emerged a clear threat to Stalin's leadership. It is thought that at the Congress, some party officials had approached Kirov secretly with the proposal he should take over as General Secretary. ...read more.

Conclusion

What is clear is that Stalin had effectively removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power. He did this by having all his opposition such as Kirov, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin, Rykov and Trotsky killed. He did this through assassinations and through arresting and trialling members of the opposition for crimes they had not committed. This was highlighted in the Moscow show trials. Stalin also made sure nothing else could overpower him by purging thee army and the secret police. The only occasions where Stalin did not effectively remove his opponents were in the failings of the early purges and when Bukharin and Rykov were acquitted of charges in 1936. However, Stalin did succeed in having the party purged effectively later on and Bukharin and Rykov were executed two years later in the third Moscow show trial. Stalin furthered his personal power by appointing new loyal men who supported their leader with enthusiasm and affection to opponents former positions. Stalin had effectively transformed the Communist Party by destroying the Revolutionary generation of Communists. Stalin destroyed any of his past enemies, any potential sources of opposition and terrified the whole Soviet population to the extent that no opposition to Stalin's rule could be organised. Therefore I think it is true to say that Stalin removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power most effectively. Word count: 2195 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    There were also many good occurrences that improved Russian living and the way, in which Russians worked and led their normal lives. It could be said that many Russian people began to feel as if they were finally being included in the government's plans to run their country, as if they could really make a difference to how everyone lived.

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    An unparalleled Terror had swept through the USSR by 1938. Vast complexes were set up and there was slave labour on various projects, with people being worked to death. Terror was inseparable from Stalin's vision of modernisation. Serious differences existed amongst the leadership of the USSR over the direction in which industry and society should develop.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Almost 300,000 prisoners were set to work on the Belomor Canal with promises that they would be set free when it was completed. By the end of the 1930's there were labour camps in every part of the USSR. Every single one of them was surrounded by watchtowers and barbed

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    These were the main ways in which in which life improved for the Soviet people. Inevitably, the over ambitious nature of the Five Year Plans had to pay a price in order to achieve any success. This cost was paid largely by people who worked as workers in the USSR.

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Source C is also biased and it will show what Western countries wanted people to think was the truth behind communism. The source is anti-Stalin but still has an important message; Stalin had become invincible because of his power. Many of his policies resulted in mass death yet no one stopped him.

  2. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    If left under the old Tsar's troops if morale dropped they could undermine Stalin and kick him out of power. Another tactic that Stalin employed was getting rid of the "Kulaks" or richer peasants. Stalin did this so that collectivisation would work. He needed to make all the peasants equal.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    But the NEP in effect served to strengthen the rich peasants (the kulaks) and NEPmen (capitalist speculators) to the detriment of the proletariat. This was a big step back, although there was no alternative, given the delay of the European revolution.

  2. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Therefore collectivisation was against the interests of the peasants. In 1932, the government doubled the tax amounts and started to take double the amount of grain from the peasants. As this went on, the Kulaks, who were the richer peasants, started to refuse to give their land and produce to the government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work