• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Halligan History Coursework Part B How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941? From the 1920's onwards, Stalin set the stage for gaining absolute power, through a number of campaigns of repression against groups which opposed the Communist Party and Stalin himself. The use of terror became a central part to Stalin's rule during the 1930's with the launching of The Great Purges against opposition to Stalin. It can be seen that Stalin did effectively remove opposition to the exercise of his personal power until 1941 when Germany invaded Russia. The term 'purge' in Soviet political slang was an abbreviation of the expression 'purge of the party ranks.' However, Stalin's terror changed its meaning to almost certain arrest, imprisonment or even execution. It is important to realise that purges in themselves were common throughout Soviet government. The Communists seized power without any real popular support and as a consequence, had to use fear and violence to maintain their position in power. There are many similarities between Stalin's terror and the terror before his rule. During the 1920's there was the banning of other political parties as well as the killing of hostages which pre-dated the same acts which took place during Stalin's reign. ...read more.

Middle

It is true that many of the initial victims of the terror were Old Bolsheviks with independent minds and who did not owe their position to Stalin. Purging this opposition allowed Stalin to bring in new loyal members who obeyed him and thus protected the exercise of his personal power. The purges could also have been motivated by Stalin's paranoia. Evidence suggests Stalin saw opposition everywhere and he told Khrushchev "I trust nobody, not even myself". Also Khrushchev stated that Stalin had "committed his excesses to boost and guarantee his own security, the continuation of his supremacy and the supremacy of his policies within the Soviet Union." Another possible reason for The Terror was because of a genuine fear of impending war from fascist Germany. This made the leaders think it necessary to remove any opposition that would be able to criticise Stalin's handling of any war that could occur. The event which triggered The Great Purges was the murder of Kirov in 1934. It was after the 17th Party Congress in 1934 that Kirov emerged a clear threat to Stalin's leadership. It is thought that at the Congress, some party officials had approached Kirov secretly with the proposal he should take over as General Secretary. ...read more.

Conclusion

What is clear is that Stalin had effectively removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power. He did this by having all his opposition such as Kirov, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin, Rykov and Trotsky killed. He did this through assassinations and through arresting and trialling members of the opposition for crimes they had not committed. This was highlighted in the Moscow show trials. Stalin also made sure nothing else could overpower him by purging thee army and the secret police. The only occasions where Stalin did not effectively remove his opponents were in the failings of the early purges and when Bukharin and Rykov were acquitted of charges in 1936. However, Stalin did succeed in having the party purged effectively later on and Bukharin and Rykov were executed two years later in the third Moscow show trial. Stalin furthered his personal power by appointing new loyal men who supported their leader with enthusiasm and affection to opponents former positions. Stalin had effectively transformed the Communist Party by destroying the Revolutionary generation of Communists. Stalin destroyed any of his past enemies, any potential sources of opposition and terrified the whole Soviet population to the extent that no opposition to Stalin's rule could be organised. Therefore I think it is true to say that Stalin removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power most effectively. Word count: 2195 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    I think that the only real way to inspire a nation to work like they did during the five-year plans is to make someone a figure to look up to, to raise morale. In this case it was Stalin. As Russia moves into the 21st century, material such as coal and iron rose dramatically.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    The books and the cabinets look new. There is a bust of Stalin visible in the corner of the room. However, the source was taken in 1940 when the USSR was under the complete rule of Stalin. In 1940 Stalin has complete control of all media and this photograph is

  1. Is Stalin the Red Tsar?

    The similarities between the two political systems are outstanding. There is one stark contrast between the two regimes in terms of political policy. The Tsar was extremely conservative, with no vision for the immediate future. He was primarily concerned with maintaining his rule, much like Stalin, but his economic policies

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    He blamed the failure to achieve these targets on the sabotage of certain elements of society, particularly the Kulak class of rich peasants, as created by Stolypin, in an attempt to preserve the Tsarist system. The existence of this class is debatable, certainly, the numbers of Kulaks was nothing like

  1. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    between them went on a rather excessive spree of concessi9ons, where it seemed the entire feudal system was effectively abolished. Even considering the backtrack the following day, the "August Decrees" still stated the abolishment of all the feudal system except for the paying of dues (which would be abolished over a number of years).

  2. Did Stalin pervert the message of the "real communists?"

    Stalin believed that socialism must be created and consolidated in one country before it can survive anywhere else. Based on Marx's teachings and assurances that communism and capitalism can not co exist Trotsky called for a permanent revolution in an attempt to spread communism throughout Europe and eventually the rest of the world.

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This source tells us that Stalin was very popular and that meeting him was seen as a great honour, it also tells us that he would be regarded in history as a great man. The creator of source E is speaking to the congress of Soviets in 1935 and so,

  2. Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin ...

    policy of the government, discredits the idea of all central, governmental power being distributed through the monarch. This can be specifically shown in the way that Nicholas II relied on special advisers, such as Sergei Witte and Peter Stolypin to mould his economic and agricultural policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work