• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Halligan History Coursework Part B How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise of his personal power up to 1941? From the 1920's onwards, Stalin set the stage for gaining absolute power, through a number of campaigns of repression against groups which opposed the Communist Party and Stalin himself. The use of terror became a central part to Stalin's rule during the 1930's with the launching of The Great Purges against opposition to Stalin. It can be seen that Stalin did effectively remove opposition to the exercise of his personal power until 1941 when Germany invaded Russia. The term 'purge' in Soviet political slang was an abbreviation of the expression 'purge of the party ranks.' However, Stalin's terror changed its meaning to almost certain arrest, imprisonment or even execution. It is important to realise that purges in themselves were common throughout Soviet government. The Communists seized power without any real popular support and as a consequence, had to use fear and violence to maintain their position in power. There are many similarities between Stalin's terror and the terror before his rule. During the 1920's there was the banning of other political parties as well as the killing of hostages which pre-dated the same acts which took place during Stalin's reign. ...read more.

Middle

It is true that many of the initial victims of the terror were Old Bolsheviks with independent minds and who did not owe their position to Stalin. Purging this opposition allowed Stalin to bring in new loyal members who obeyed him and thus protected the exercise of his personal power. The purges could also have been motivated by Stalin's paranoia. Evidence suggests Stalin saw opposition everywhere and he told Khrushchev "I trust nobody, not even myself". Also Khrushchev stated that Stalin had "committed his excesses to boost and guarantee his own security, the continuation of his supremacy and the supremacy of his policies within the Soviet Union." Another possible reason for The Terror was because of a genuine fear of impending war from fascist Germany. This made the leaders think it necessary to remove any opposition that would be able to criticise Stalin's handling of any war that could occur. The event which triggered The Great Purges was the murder of Kirov in 1934. It was after the 17th Party Congress in 1934 that Kirov emerged a clear threat to Stalin's leadership. It is thought that at the Congress, some party officials had approached Kirov secretly with the proposal he should take over as General Secretary. ...read more.

Conclusion

What is clear is that Stalin had effectively removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power. He did this by having all his opposition such as Kirov, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin, Rykov and Trotsky killed. He did this through assassinations and through arresting and trialling members of the opposition for crimes they had not committed. This was highlighted in the Moscow show trials. Stalin also made sure nothing else could overpower him by purging thee army and the secret police. The only occasions where Stalin did not effectively remove his opponents were in the failings of the early purges and when Bukharin and Rykov were acquitted of charges in 1936. However, Stalin did succeed in having the party purged effectively later on and Bukharin and Rykov were executed two years later in the third Moscow show trial. Stalin furthered his personal power by appointing new loyal men who supported their leader with enthusiasm and affection to opponents former positions. Stalin had effectively transformed the Communist Party by destroying the Revolutionary generation of Communists. Stalin destroyed any of his past enemies, any potential sources of opposition and terrified the whole Soviet population to the extent that no opposition to Stalin's rule could be organised. Therefore I think it is true to say that Stalin removed all opposition to the exercise of his personal power most effectively. Word count: 2195 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    During the NEP there was a reduction of attacks on religious organisations, but the government tried to split up the Orthodox Church and arrested priests who didn't obey the government. In 1929 a new law was passed, it was now illegal to engage in religious activities outside the religious buildings, only licensed people were allowed to meet for worship.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Collectivisation increased grain production, which could be used to buy machinery. Overall the Soviet Union made enormous economic progress; the Five Year Plans transformed the economy and the society of the Soviet Union. Russia was a success story, under the leadership of one man, Stalin.

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    The books and the cabinets look new. There is a bust of Stalin visible in the corner of the room. However, the source was taken in 1940 when the USSR was under the complete rule of Stalin. In 1940 Stalin has complete control of all media and this photograph is

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    He blamed the failure to achieve these targets on the sabotage of certain elements of society, particularly the Kulak class of rich peasants, as created by Stolypin, in an attempt to preserve the Tsarist system. The existence of this class is debatable, certainly, the numbers of Kulaks was nothing like

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Meanwhile, as peasants flooded into cities to work in factories, all the main communication services became severely overcrowded - transports such as trams or buses were crammed to the point of suffocation. Moreover, overcrowding was not just limited to the transport.

  2. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    Although many people died and it was a very harsh way of doing it was effective to keep Stalin in power because no one could go against him and if they did they would be killed by the Secret Police.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    I also know that Stalin clearly did not care that much for mankind because by getting rid of millions of people was his way of improving a country. Source E is another example showing that Stalin was a great leader.

  2. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    Even after the Bastille, the king's attempts at stabilising the situation and gaining back support by calling back Necker and adding white to the colours of the Assembly was viewed as a cheap attempt to consolidate the people. In addition there was the matter that news travelled relatively slowly, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work