• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like? The Battle for Dunkirk was originally solely a strategic retreat from mainland Europe, in order to save lives. The battle only took place to stop the invading Germans from reaching the escaping Allies, or to at least give the Allies more time to retreat. The popular propaganda that was released after the evacuation led to people viewing it as a heroic retreat, because a clear image was created for the British public. This image was the British army being very brave and heroic, and achieving a clear victory in the face of the power and aggression of Germany. This image became commonly known as the 'Hell of Dunkirk', because the conditions were believed to be a sort of hell on earth. However, this image of the 'Hell of Dunkirk' can vary, when eyewitness reports and sources are read. Source A here views the Navy as the saviours of the British army, and it explains how crucial the role of the rescuers was. ...read more.


Source C is from the point of view of a seaman who was presumably aboard his ship at the time, since he would have been aiding the evacuation process. He does not tell us anything about the actual battle for Dunkirk, but does tell us how the soldiers defended the beaches. This man may not be so critical of the army because he is not in the navy, or it might be just because he was so impressed by the bravery of this one particular soldier. This source helps contribute to our perception of the battle by telling us how this sergeant fought back against the German planes, and succeeded. This source confirms the myth of the 'hell of Dunkirk' because he saw so many men die, but yet he also saw tremendous bravery. He also states that the man who was so brave was a sergeant, confirming that there were senior officers to help keep order. All the sources are written by men aiding the evacuation process by ship, but source A was written by a naval officer, and so criticises the army. ...read more.


These sources give us a very limited view of the battle because there is no information about the defending of the surrounding land to give the soldiers on the beach more time to escape, there is no account from an ordinary soldier who was on the beach, there are no accounts from officers who could prove that there were many soldiers, contradicting source A. To make these sources more representative, we would need there to be information about the German approach, instead just focusing on the army being evacuated by seamen and the navy. In conclusion, these sources are useful in finding out the seamen's perspective on the evacuation from Dunkirk, for finding out that there were incidences of bravery, which does concur with the myth of Dunkirk, and to see from an unaffected position how the evacuation went. You can also find out that the 'myth of Dunkirk' was similar to the reality in some areas of battle, but not in all. None of these sources refers to the battle that was taking place, and therefore cannot help us to understand the battle. However to find out what the battle for Dunkirk was like, these sources are not useful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Due to the large no. of people in the photos I don't think they are fake and they coincide with my own knowledge in parts. I think the source may be bias as the author is unknown but was probably taken by the allies as no Germans would have been at the Dunkirk beaches during the evacuation.

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    It is from a book 'World War 2'. The source implies that the BEF left many of their equipment and much of it was destroyed. Many people believed that the British were forcefully pushed out of France and failed to stop the Nazis from attacking France.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Below are 3 sources that I have explained in detail supporting Dunkirk being a morale victory. Sources 6 are two pictures. In the first we can see Allied troops up to their necks in water, queuing up orderly waiting to get evacuated.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The second picture shows men queuing in lines along the beach waiting to be picked up by evacuation vessels, the evacuation looks organised. This source is reliable because photographs do not lie; it is also a primary source, and due to my background knowledge I know that there were thousands

  1. How successful was Dunkirk

    He recalls how easy it was to kill the soldiers because the beach was swarming with soldiers. This backs up the nature of the evacuation as the words 'the beaches were jammed with soldiers' suggests there was no structured well thought plan, just masses of troops all desperately trying to escape with no thought for others.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The source tells us how the troops waded out into the sea, swimming and fighting for boats. I think this source is fairly reliable, as it was written by an ordinary British soldier who was an eyewitness at Dunkirk, and therefore it can't be misinformed.

  1. Defeat, deliverace or victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Gaze of the royal Army Ordnance Corps. When he describes the scene on the beach in Dunkirk he speaks mostly of the disorderly and uncordinated nature of the defeat and even mentions 'naval officers using their revolvers', this shows that almost all sense of discipline has broken down and the situation is chaos.

  2. Battle Of Britain - The Popular Myth

    However the book could be over exaggerated to make the RAF seem far more heroic and brave. This is only the experience of one man and many other pilots might have had different experiences. Richard Hillary would not of been in a good frame of mind as he was badly injured and emotionally scared.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work