• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like? The Battle for Dunkirk was originally solely a strategic retreat from mainland Europe, in order to save lives. The battle only took place to stop the invading Germans from reaching the escaping Allies, or to at least give the Allies more time to retreat. The popular propaganda that was released after the evacuation led to people viewing it as a heroic retreat, because a clear image was created for the British public. This image was the British army being very brave and heroic, and achieving a clear victory in the face of the power and aggression of Germany. This image became commonly known as the 'Hell of Dunkirk', because the conditions were believed to be a sort of hell on earth. However, this image of the 'Hell of Dunkirk' can vary, when eyewitness reports and sources are read. Source A here views the Navy as the saviours of the British army, and it explains how crucial the role of the rescuers was. ...read more.


Source C is from the point of view of a seaman who was presumably aboard his ship at the time, since he would have been aiding the evacuation process. He does not tell us anything about the actual battle for Dunkirk, but does tell us how the soldiers defended the beaches. This man may not be so critical of the army because he is not in the navy, or it might be just because he was so impressed by the bravery of this one particular soldier. This source helps contribute to our perception of the battle by telling us how this sergeant fought back against the German planes, and succeeded. This source confirms the myth of the 'hell of Dunkirk' because he saw so many men die, but yet he also saw tremendous bravery. He also states that the man who was so brave was a sergeant, confirming that there were senior officers to help keep order. All the sources are written by men aiding the evacuation process by ship, but source A was written by a naval officer, and so criticises the army. ...read more.


These sources give us a very limited view of the battle because there is no information about the defending of the surrounding land to give the soldiers on the beach more time to escape, there is no account from an ordinary soldier who was on the beach, there are no accounts from officers who could prove that there were many soldiers, contradicting source A. To make these sources more representative, we would need there to be information about the German approach, instead just focusing on the army being evacuated by seamen and the navy. In conclusion, these sources are useful in finding out the seamen's perspective on the evacuation from Dunkirk, for finding out that there were incidences of bravery, which does concur with the myth of Dunkirk, and to see from an unaffected position how the evacuation went. You can also find out that the 'myth of Dunkirk' was similar to the reality in some areas of battle, but not in all. None of these sources refers to the battle that was taking place, and therefore cannot help us to understand the battle. However to find out what the battle for Dunkirk was like, these sources are not useful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    has researched precise dates '1939-1940' which could make his information more accurate. However the author seems bias and highly patriotic and due to his job could be loyal to the armed forces affecting the reliability. He uses very dramatic language as he wants his book to sell well so he could be writing to please the audience.

  2. Haig in sources

    hidden from the British public so they didn't lack faith and assurance that Douglas Haig and his generals and officers were not incapable and incompetent. 6. Study Sources J and K To what extent do these sources prove that the Battle of the Somme was a failure for the British and the French (7)

  1. Source A, B and C are useful when finding out what the Battle of ...

    They do, however, seem to be exaggerated. Compared to Source A, Source B has a completely different opinion to source A about the Battle. Source A talks about how the men were "the odds and ends of an army" but sources B and C talk about how brave and heroic the soldiers were and in "columns" which suggests organisation.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    The word 'appeared' implies that he's not quite sure about how much they earned but he is also comparing it to the other mills he visited. It also suggests that they look good/happy to work there. Another use of the source is the he says "no doubt Greg has provided

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of ...

    Source C has a lot of advantages over the other 2 sources. First of all, it corroborates with Source F in the coursework booklet because the image shows troops firing on planes. Also, a Cornish able seaman would have no reason to make the army look better than they actually are.

  2. Battle Of Britain - The Popular Myth

    Sir Arthur Bryant wrote the article in the last year of the war, when Britain was close to victory. Sir Arthur Bryant tells us how a small number of brave and heroic men came out victorious, who were heavily outnumbered by the enemy.

  1. How useful are sources A, B, and C in understanding what the battle of ...

    For a common seaman he seems to speak too well, almost rehearsed. This makes me jump to a conclusion that he may have been told to say these words to help create the myth of Dunkirk, because those words surely wouldn't be a familiar phrase to him.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    and for the first time the British public realised that they could actually lose the war. The Low moral was due to many soldiers dying and men not knowing when they would be evacuated. The soldiers had lostbelief that they could beat the Nazis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work