• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for Dunkirk was like? The Battle for Dunkirk was originally solely a strategic retreat from mainland Europe, in order to save lives. The battle only took place to stop the invading Germans from reaching the escaping Allies, or to at least give the Allies more time to retreat. The popular propaganda that was released after the evacuation led to people viewing it as a heroic retreat, because a clear image was created for the British public. This image was the British army being very brave and heroic, and achieving a clear victory in the face of the power and aggression of Germany. This image became commonly known as the 'Hell of Dunkirk', because the conditions were believed to be a sort of hell on earth. However, this image of the 'Hell of Dunkirk' can vary, when eyewitness reports and sources are read. Source A here views the Navy as the saviours of the British army, and it explains how crucial the role of the rescuers was. ...read more.


Source C is from the point of view of a seaman who was presumably aboard his ship at the time, since he would have been aiding the evacuation process. He does not tell us anything about the actual battle for Dunkirk, but does tell us how the soldiers defended the beaches. This man may not be so critical of the army because he is not in the navy, or it might be just because he was so impressed by the bravery of this one particular soldier. This source helps contribute to our perception of the battle by telling us how this sergeant fought back against the German planes, and succeeded. This source confirms the myth of the 'hell of Dunkirk' because he saw so many men die, but yet he also saw tremendous bravery. He also states that the man who was so brave was a sergeant, confirming that there were senior officers to help keep order. All the sources are written by men aiding the evacuation process by ship, but source A was written by a naval officer, and so criticises the army. ...read more.


These sources give us a very limited view of the battle because there is no information about the defending of the surrounding land to give the soldiers on the beach more time to escape, there is no account from an ordinary soldier who was on the beach, there are no accounts from officers who could prove that there were many soldiers, contradicting source A. To make these sources more representative, we would need there to be information about the German approach, instead just focusing on the army being evacuated by seamen and the navy. In conclusion, these sources are useful in finding out the seamen's perspective on the evacuation from Dunkirk, for finding out that there were incidences of bravery, which does concur with the myth of Dunkirk, and to see from an unaffected position how the evacuation went. You can also find out that the 'myth of Dunkirk' was similar to the reality in some areas of battle, but not in all. None of these sources refers to the battle that was taking place, and therefore cannot help us to understand the battle. However to find out what the battle for Dunkirk was like, these sources are not useful. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    It is from a book 'World War 2'. The source implies that the BEF left many of their equipment and much of it was destroyed. Many people believed that the British were forcefully pushed out of France and failed to stop the Nazis from attacking France.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The source also says that the significance of Dunkirk was only comprehended after as Hitler realised that Britain could continue in the war, and this can be seen as deliverance. It was victory only because of German's mistake as Hitler halted the tanks and underestimated Britain.

  1. Haig in sources

    even if the tommies did get across no mans land they would be held up by the barbed wire but not the machine gum fire as they would have been destroyed by the bombardment, and would not of been shot down and not as many deaths.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    the source in ,'and naval officers using their revolvers' illustrating a scene of total chaos and panic, even amongst the officers. The information seems reliable as the account is primary and first hand and although from a British author doesn't seem biased.

  1. How successful was Dunkirk

    first day which would not be a fair representation of the events. An additional source which supports this type of defeat is source 2. These two images illustrate the equipment abandoned on the beaches. This shows a hurried evacuation which backs up the belief of a panicked evacuation.

  2. Source A, B and C are useful when finding out what the Battle of ...

    Around 338,000 soldiers were rescued, 198,000 of these being British and 139,000 being French. Source B describes a scene from the battle, where German Fighter planes cut through "those columns of soldiers" like a reaper slicing through corn. This suggests that the German machine guns were successful at killing many of the British men.

  1. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    In the first paragraph, he goes on to talk about that is august 1835, Mrs. shawcross left the mill because Mr. Shawcross had died, from this information, we are able to cross-reference the information from source A, and in source a, written in 1836, both George and Elizabeth were alive and well enough to take part in an interview.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of ...

    Source D, the painting by Charles Cundall, shows the troops in some sort of orderly line waiting to get on the boats. This may have been another part of the beach were the commander couldn't see. Overall, the source is not useful on telling us what the battle of Dunkirk was like.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work