• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? To determine the usefulness of sources A, B and C we must first look at the value, limitation and reliability of the sources towards the question, what was the battle of Dunkirk like? Source A tells us what the state of the army was like at the time of the battle. It does not however tell us what the battle of Dunkirk was like. The person who wrote the article is a commander in the navy. He is commenting on the state of the army so he does not have as much expertise as a commander in the army. However, he was there at the time of the battle so it is a primary source which makes it more reliable than something written after. ...read more.

Middle

The source does show us what the state of the army was like but that is not the question. Source B is a lot different from source A because it does relate to the question. Bill Elmslie was there at the time so he did have access to information about the battle. Although Elmslie is in the navy, he speaks about the army in a much nicer way than Kerr so Elmslie can be trusted more. However, it does not corroborate with my own knowledge because the army and navy did not get on. This leads me to believe that it may be propaganda which makes it a lot less reliable. Although it may not be reliable, it is still has some value in answering the question. It tells us that they were still being attacked on the boats and that they were getting attacked on the beaches. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, as the information corroborates with my own knowledge and Source F I would say that it is not bias or propaganda. In conclusion, I think that sources B and C are useful in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like. Source A however, does not help us at all. It tells what state the army was in but this is from one person's point of view and it is only one section of the beach. Source B may be propaganda but it still tells us that the danger was not over once you were on the ships. This corroborates with my own knowledge because in Major Taylors talk he said that they still got attacked on the boats. Finally, source C tells us that they got attacked from the air and that the troops were still fighting back. As this source corroborates with my own knowledge and Source F it a very reliable source. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The photographs could have been produced to be used as propaganda showing Dunkirk how they wanted the public to see it. The date at which the photographs were taken is unknown which decreases the sources reliability as some days of the evacuation went more smoothly than others.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    Hundreds of people gave their boats to help evacuate soldiers off the beaches of Dunkirk. Many sailed their boats across the English Channel, some with no military experience. The braveness of these people was recognized by some of the top figures. J.P Preistly stated on one of his radio broadcast.

  1. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    Both sources are limited because the sources may have been affected by hindsight and that they may have had a particular view about the evacuation. In source K J.Burn is offering opinion rather than fact making the source limited. Whereas with source F Sources C and E agree the statement,

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for ...

    However, this man does not just continually state the hopelessness of the army, but in fact praises their courageousness. He says that they are almost standing up to death, as the German pilots' machine guns were 'cutting through those columns of soldiers'.

  1. Source A, B and C are useful when finding out what the Battle of ...

    This is a disadvantage because there is no information from the men who were contributing in other parts of the country for example in the army or from the civilians. Also none of them were on the beach itself therefore wouldn't know the position or attitudes of those men who were trying to escape of the beach.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of ...

    Source B is written by a seaman who was at Dunkirk. This source gives us a good view of Dunkirk but like the previous source has its limitations. This source gives a personal account of the German forces attacking. This source does not tell us much other vital information, such

  1. How successful was Dunkirk

    This source is not that reliable as these pictures were taken by an unknown author. The particular images portrayed gives the impression that a German is the author as it only shows the negative events concerning the British so this source could be bias, therefore reliability is called into questioned.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    This source shows panic between troops and the Government. This was quite unusual as this message was given on the most successful day of the evacuation, when 47,081 troops were brought to safety. This source is quite reliable as the message is written at the time of the evacuation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work