• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ashley Simon History Coursework 4th February 2003 Dunkirk Coursework Essay 1 How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of Dunkirk was like? Explain your answer. On May 26th 1940, the British and French forces found themselves on the beaches of Dunkirk after being pushed back from Brussels by the German soldiers. They had to be evacuated to safety from the shores and many small boats came and picked up the men from the water. Overall, Dunkirk was believed to be successful as many men were saved. I will now discuss how the sources are and are not helpful in telling us what happened at Dunkirk. Source A is an account given by ommander Thomas Kerr, one of the naval officers who were sent to organize the evacuation. Source A is a helpful source but has many limitations. It does not give us the opinion of the public behind the war which means we are not entirely sure as to whether the public backed the war or not. Source A does not give us the government opinion. It is important to know the government view because they are the main people behind the war and the ones who make all the decisions. ...read more.

Middle

This source also has a few weaknesses, which make it less helpful. One of these weaknesses is that it does not give us an opinion of how organized the men on the beaches were like Source a does. In addition, this source does not tell us the role, which the Navy played at Dunkirk and how successful they were. This source also does not list the problems, which were faced at Dunkirk, like the fact that many resources had to be destroyed or left behind, as they could not be carried on the boats. This meant that many ammunitions and vehicles were destroyed. Although many factors make the sources weak and in some cases unreliable they can also be quite helpful in giving us an idea of some of the things which took place at Dunkirk. Source A is helpful in many ways because it gives us a personal account of how well the navy performed and gives us a view of how organised the men on the beaches were. We get this view of how organised they were when the Naval officer who is giving his account refers to the soldiers as a rabble. This source also gives us a little view of the losses at Dunkirk because it says that they had: "the odds ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that the sergeant has driven away eight German bombers makes him look very heroic and brave. This source is similar to Source B again because it gives us a view of the German attacks at Dunkirk. This helps to gives us a better understanding of what the battles were like and who was in control. All of the sources give us a personal account of seaman who was at Dunkirk helping the evacuation. All the sources together give a rough outline as to what the battle of Dunkirk was like, helping our understanding of Dunkirk. However, all of the sources fail to give us the public and government opinion on the war, which means they fail to give us an overall view of whether the majority of the people supported the war. This means that their accounts can be seen as unreliable as they do not have the backing of a majority to support their view. I think that all of the sources are equally as helpful as they all give a personal account of different aspects of Dunkirk, which means they cannot be measured against one another because they give us different information. Although the sources had many weaknesses, they also had strengths. Overall, I think that the sources had more strengths than weaknesses and were useful in giving an account of Dunkirk. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    Below is an extract from the speech Winston Churchill made to the House of Commons. (SOURCE M5) What Churchill said in public was not what he really believed. The source below helps to explain this (SOURCE D5) His interpretation was that Dunkirk was the greatest military defeat for the British.

  2. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    Therefore from what we know we and see from the painting we can say the source is reliable Sources K and F have mixed reactions with the evacuation from Dunkirk, they all show their views. Source F is an extract from J Jackson's The Fall of France: The invasion of 1940 published in 2003.

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    But however it is extremely biased because he is talking to the prime minister therefore he might want to say good things. It might be spoken for propaganda purposes; it is also a way of promoting Churchill himself and to help lift the "Dunkirk Spirit".

  2. Haig in sources

    be true as the British and French were held at a stalemate with the Germans until the Americans joined the war then the British, French and Americans started to advance. This seems to prove that the Battle of the Somme was not s failure because, the entente defeated the Germans,

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    A source which shows the psychological victory gained by the British people through Dunkirk is source 5 by Major LF Ellis in which it says ' 'Dunkirk' holds a unique place in the hearts of British people'. It also describes Dunkirk as 'a naval affair in which civilians played so

  2. How successful was Dunkirk

    figures on injuries and the death toll on troops gives the view of a military defeat. This newspaper quotes directly from Churchill who was a key figure during Dunkirk so he had access to details and was directly involved; allowing his information to be more accurate.

  1. Windsor Coursework

    food and facilities such as good attractive restaurants. Evalutaion of my results In this paragraph I will explain what I have discovered from my results, and answer the three main questions according to my results. In my personal opinion Windsor is a good tourist centre and the graphs that were produced from the information I gathered from the tourists and residents of windsor .

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    Overall source B10 opposes to the interpretation of the Battle of Dunkirk because it shows negative information. On the other hand it can also be criticised due to the source being biased. Source B16 is primary source propaganda broadcast which was broadcasted in June 1940 by a traitor of Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work