• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commander during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge from you studies in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commander during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge from you studies in your answer: Source A depicts a general during a practise attack declaring how the real attack will be difference to the practise, he states ". . . First, The absence of the enemy" turning to the sergeant major he asks for the second reason. The officer replies with "The absence of the General, Sir". This is a typical cheeky cartoon displaying the stereotype of generals who don't go and visit the battle fields. To a historian this source is of some use however the source doesn't declare what date it is. It is from a British magazine - 'Punch'. This magazine was published from 1841 - 1992. I believe this to be most probably from the early post WWI so this shows how the general public (the majority of the men being made up of soldier) were feeling. However 'Punch' was mainly read by the upper class meaning that this view could be biased towards people who served in the war who came from upper class families and hence not provide an accurate view. ...read more.

Middle

However there is no evidence to support that Haig was a highly efficient soldier, the source does not go into depth regarding that which leads us to question the bias of the source. It's written by Haig's son so most probably is biased towards Haig. The source doesn't offer any evidence to support the claims and makes this no more than an opinion. Source F is very negative towards Haig as a person however mentions that he had great self-confidence and that he did not know when to recognized defeat. This could be seen in 2 views. 1 that he was wrong and should of stopped fighting, and the other being that if he had stopped; co-operation with the French would have broken down (source H refers to this and hence implies that Haig was not wrong to carry on fighting) and allowed Germany to win the war. This inability to recognise defeat resulted in Britain prevailing over Germany due to the sustained fighting in my opinion. Source J is a tribute to Haig by the Germans, They certainly agree Haig was a good soldier - "Haig is certainly one of the ablest generals of contemporary England . ...read more.

Conclusion

heavy artillery) However one could argue that Haig was quite versatile and was happy to let experts do what they needed to do and he did use tanks and realised how powerful artillery was and used them to his advantage. Haig didn't stay anywhere near the frontline which leads one to question how could he order his men to go to fight if he didn't know about any complication. On the other hand if he had died on the front line he would of been no use. John Laffin believes that Haig's mindset of the war being one of attrition was an appalling tactic, yet others would argue that it was the only way to win the war. In my opinion I think that Haig was not a perfect general, He did not find out what was happening on the frontline which clouded his judgement, nevertheless He did lead the British to victory which in my opinion suggests that he was a highly skilled and efficient soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory. At the time there was no one who could have done better than him, perhaps he was the best of a bad bunch yet he still brought Britain to victory. ?? ?? ?? ?? Will Price Centre Number:25140 Candidate Number :2485 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the British People 1914 ...

    4 star(s)

    So even before the war women's suffrage was becoming recognised by the government, even some became supporters. There are numerous takes on why the suffragettes and suffragists won them the vote. The fact that they stopped campaigning during the war period meant they would gain some respect from the public

  2. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The men would have seen their friends and compatriots die under Haig, and would have an extensive bias against him; however surely the authorities would also have recognised this. As previously discussed, he was made an Earl and rewarded with a substantial amount of money.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The number of boats and aircraft lost was also very high. Out of 860 ships used to save 340,000 men 243 boats were sunk by attacks from dive-bombing Luftwaffe. So many boats were lost because Dunkirk was not an appropriate port for such an operation.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    This lack of information has been a large topic for discussion when considering Haig's effectiveness. Some people say that he was so uninformed because he never went to the front line, but lived in a well-supplied chateau forty miles behind the line.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Comments made by Haig prior to the attack. Problems with troops were a major factor in the British failing to reach their objectives and the Somme concluding as a disaster. The army almost entirely consisted of civilians. Civilians who had a very different image of war, civilians who had no experience in trench warfare or in combat and had very poor training to prepare them.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    of defeat, and he seems to be concentrating on how he can keep his men alive rather than concentrating on their morale's. The source seems to be very unbiased, but the way it contradicts previous Churchill sources, makes his other sources very unreliable.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    It shows how little women were thought of and places the argument that if these lowly people can vote then why can't a woman? B1 was written by Emily Hall, a suffragette who puts forward their many arguments clearly. She thought many women, like herself had proven their worth and capability.

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    This supports the fact that the Generals acted as cowards and could not possibly know how to win a battle if they do not see the problems facing the army and learn from them. One can argue this source is not reliable as this source was written after the battle

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work