• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: - How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Sources A, B and C are all about General Haig and the tactics he used during the Battle of the Somme. They are all very different sources. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch, without looking at the source we already know what it is likely to be made up of due to its origin. Firstly, it is British and so is obviously going to bias. Secondly, the cartoon is from the magazine Punch, Punch is a very controversial, sarcastic and ironic magazine and is made to entertain and humour the public. Because of these reasons it is quite unreliable and unhelpful. ...read more.

Middle

In order for this source to be more useful it could contain soldier's thoughts or opinions and what the Generals orders were. Another sarcastic view of Haig's tactics comes from source B. This source is made up of quotes from a Blackadder episode, again we know that this programme is set out to entertain and takes a sarcastic approach rather than a serious one. The source refers to the commanders as "Captain 'insanity' Melchitt" and refers to the battle as "A mass slaughter" Because of this we again doubt the commander's skills and capabilities and the source is telling us that this is also the public perception. Similarly to Source A the source does not give a soldiers opinion and only shows the opinion of the public. And although the actors are meant to be soldiers at the battle of the Somme, we still have no factual evidence of what the actual soldiers thought. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also know from personal knowledge and from studying other sources that the soldiers disagreed with the commander's leadership tactics. From a source written by Lieutenant J.A Raws he states: "I honestly believe that Goldie and many others were murdered through the stupidity of those on authority." This shows the actual viewpoints of the soldiers, some thing which none of the sources do. In order for this source to be more useful it could include the number of deaths i.e. 60 000 on the first day of battle, and some quotes from the soldiers that Earl Haig talked to, this would make the source also become more reliable. For the aforementioned reasons I have come to the conclusion that, although the sources show certain opinions about the commanders, they are not useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers. In order for them to be useful they must contain actual quotes from soldiers i.e. like that of Lieutenant J.A Raws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Is there sufficient Evidence in Sources C to L to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer. Sources C, F, H, K, J and L have some evidence within them to support that Haig was highly skilled and an efficient soldier.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    The source is useful in telling us about the conditions in styal mill, but it tells us no information on the conditions of the other mills, which is what we want to find out. A limitation of the source is that we know that Thomas couldn't read nor write, and

  1. Haig in sources

    be true as the British and French were held at a stalemate with the Germans until the Americans joined the war then the British, French and Americans started to advance. This seems to prove that the Battle of the Somme was not s failure because, the entente defeated the Germans,

  2. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    This may be as a step towards peace as opposed to an affiliation with certain groups. (Table 3) When asked if they would vote on another referendum today (s3q33) the majority of those that would not vote are once again those of no religious denomination - 35% with those most

  1. How useful are sources A, B, and C to a historian studying the attitudes ...

    is not very useful for finding out about the views of soldiers in the First World War. This source has the same type of satirical opinion as source A. Source C is an extract from an article in the newspaper; 'The Daily Telegraph' published on in November 1998.

  2. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    The source is telling me that the Generals were pretty useless and made a lot of innocent people lose their lives. It also tells me that soldiers really did dislike their Generals because they put a lot of soldiers and innocent people in life risking situations.

  1. How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    This would have been so that they were able to gain an understanding of what was actually happening. This makes a different to why I trust it because the publishers would not want to lie to the people not knowing what was happening to their loved ones.

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    and regards their advancement on the enemy as 'no further than an asthmatic ant carrying some heavy shopping'. Through these quotes we are able confirm that the soldiers view towards their commanders was that they had no idea of what the war was really like at the front line and out of touch with success of the battles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work