• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: - How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Sources A, B and C are all about General Haig and the tactics he used during the Battle of the Somme. They are all very different sources. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch, without looking at the source we already know what it is likely to be made up of due to its origin. Firstly, it is British and so is obviously going to bias. Secondly, the cartoon is from the magazine Punch, Punch is a very controversial, sarcastic and ironic magazine and is made to entertain and humour the public. Because of these reasons it is quite unreliable and unhelpful. ...read more.

Middle

In order for this source to be more useful it could contain soldier's thoughts or opinions and what the Generals orders were. Another sarcastic view of Haig's tactics comes from source B. This source is made up of quotes from a Blackadder episode, again we know that this programme is set out to entertain and takes a sarcastic approach rather than a serious one. The source refers to the commanders as "Captain 'insanity' Melchitt" and refers to the battle as "A mass slaughter" Because of this we again doubt the commander's skills and capabilities and the source is telling us that this is also the public perception. Similarly to Source A the source does not give a soldiers opinion and only shows the opinion of the public. And although the actors are meant to be soldiers at the battle of the Somme, we still have no factual evidence of what the actual soldiers thought. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also know from personal knowledge and from studying other sources that the soldiers disagreed with the commander's leadership tactics. From a source written by Lieutenant J.A Raws he states: "I honestly believe that Goldie and many others were murdered through the stupidity of those on authority." This shows the actual viewpoints of the soldiers, some thing which none of the sources do. In order for this source to be more useful it could include the number of deaths i.e. 60 000 on the first day of battle, and some quotes from the soldiers that Earl Haig talked to, this would make the source also become more reliable. For the aforementioned reasons I have come to the conclusion that, although the sources show certain opinions about the commanders, they are not useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers. In order for them to be useful they must contain actual quotes from soldiers i.e. like that of Lieutenant J.A Raws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Haig was aware of the thick barbed wire and the deep German dug-outs. However, He felt that the artillery bombardment was more than capable of eliminating those obstacles. Technology was being boosted and Britain had just developed the tank that had high expectations.

  2. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    A historian would find this source very useful because it clearly states the way the way the Suffragettes thought, and it outlines the many arguments they had. I think that this source would be reliable as it was written by a suffragette and unless you wanted a balanced view this source tells you how many women thought.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    However it does have some use to a historian because the author talks about how some of the older soldiers never said a bad word about Haig. On the other hand I believe this should be treated with scepticism due to the bias of the excerpt in the first paragraph.

  2. Haig in sources

    hidden from the British public so they didn't lack faith and assurance that Douglas Haig and his generals and officers were not incapable and incompetent. 6. Study Sources J and K To what extent do these sources prove that the Battle of the Somme was a failure for the British and the French (7)

  1. How useful are the sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle ...

    "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." (A.J.P Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your knowledge to explain your answer. The quote made by A.J.P Taylor is a contradiction.

  2. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    It will show us whether they still support the agreement and whether or not they have faith in it. To begin with we can look at how respondents voted in the 1998 referendum (s3q34). This will demonstrate their opinion at the time of the referendum and whether they supported it and felt it would be of benefit.

  1. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    The soldiers feel that the General is never there. Source B: This source is useful in studying the attitudes of soldiers towards their commanders. This source tells me that the soldiers do not have any respect towards their commanders. This source was written after the war in a series called "Blackadder goes forth" on BBC TV.

  2. First World War Sources Questions

    This also suggests that the source is more reliable as it is backed up by other sources. 6. (a) Sources 11, 12 and 13 all complement Haig as being a very worthy leader of the British army. Source 11 begins by saying how David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work