• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: - How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Sources A, B and C are all about General Haig and the tactics he used during the Battle of the Somme. They are all very different sources. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch, without looking at the source we already know what it is likely to be made up of due to its origin. Firstly, it is British and so is obviously going to bias. Secondly, the cartoon is from the magazine Punch, Punch is a very controversial, sarcastic and ironic magazine and is made to entertain and humour the public. Because of these reasons it is quite unreliable and unhelpful. ...read more.

Middle

In order for this source to be more useful it could contain soldier's thoughts or opinions and what the Generals orders were. Another sarcastic view of Haig's tactics comes from source B. This source is made up of quotes from a Blackadder episode, again we know that this programme is set out to entertain and takes a sarcastic approach rather than a serious one. The source refers to the commanders as "Captain 'insanity' Melchitt" and refers to the battle as "A mass slaughter" Because of this we again doubt the commander's skills and capabilities and the source is telling us that this is also the public perception. Similarly to Source A the source does not give a soldiers opinion and only shows the opinion of the public. And although the actors are meant to be soldiers at the battle of the Somme, we still have no factual evidence of what the actual soldiers thought. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also know from personal knowledge and from studying other sources that the soldiers disagreed with the commander's leadership tactics. From a source written by Lieutenant J.A Raws he states: "I honestly believe that Goldie and many others were murdered through the stupidity of those on authority." This shows the actual viewpoints of the soldiers, some thing which none of the sources do. In order for this source to be more useful it could include the number of deaths i.e. 60 000 on the first day of battle, and some quotes from the soldiers that Earl Haig talked to, this would make the source also become more reliable. For the aforementioned reasons I have come to the conclusion that, although the sources show certain opinions about the commanders, they are not useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers. In order for them to be useful they must contain actual quotes from soldiers i.e. like that of Lieutenant J.A Raws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Source C is biased not because it was written by Haig's son (however I'm sure that is part of the reason for his view) but because it does not refer to any hard evidence for the reasons it puts forward, it is an opinion rather than a view.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    was found in London where he made a statement to a local magistrate. This source is useful in telling us information about the mill. He talks about the sleeping arrangement and how they got clean shirts every Sunday. He then goes on to mention that none of the machinery was

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    view point of the producers of the programme and not the view of the Public. Although some characters such as Captain Darling are portrayed as being a bit of an idiot other officers such as Captain Blackadder are shown as 'good' characters which could mean the programme doesnot contain to much bias although a little may be present.

  2. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    This source is very useful as it shows how prior to the First World War the stereotypical woman was viewed by the men of the time. It also shows how limited women's lives were, as they were expected to fulfil the same duties repeatedly and were seen only as a means of fulfilling them not for who they were.

  1. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    The soldiers feel that the General is never there. Source B: This source is useful in studying the attitudes of soldiers towards their commanders. This source tells me that the soldiers do not have any respect towards their commanders. This source was written after the war in a series called "Blackadder goes forth" on BBC TV.

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    The author's aim was to amuse the average British person, and considering that about 15-20% of the British population were soldiers, the average British person would at the very least have a soldier in the family. This means that the author would have probably made the cartoon with bias towards soldiers, and would have drawn the soldiers' views.

  1. Study Sources B and C. Which Source is more useful as evidence about the ...

    However source C gives a true eyewitness report that gives real insight into the conditions of evacuation. Most of the facts in this source can be backed and it gives more useful information for the start of the children's evacuation journey.

  2. How useful are useful sources 1-8 in showing similarities and the differences in the ...

    These jobs paid very high wages and need skill to do the job properly this would have meant that only upper and middle class women would have been given the job. As much dangerous this job was it also was a very important job as much of world war 2

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work