• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question one: - How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Sources A, B and C are all about General Haig and the tactics he used during the Battle of the Somme. They are all very different sources. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch, without looking at the source we already know what it is likely to be made up of due to its origin. Firstly, it is British and so is obviously going to bias. Secondly, the cartoon is from the magazine Punch, Punch is a very controversial, sarcastic and ironic magazine and is made to entertain and humour the public. Because of these reasons it is quite unreliable and unhelpful. ...read more.

Middle

In order for this source to be more useful it could contain soldier's thoughts or opinions and what the Generals orders were. Another sarcastic view of Haig's tactics comes from source B. This source is made up of quotes from a Blackadder episode, again we know that this programme is set out to entertain and takes a sarcastic approach rather than a serious one. The source refers to the commanders as "Captain 'insanity' Melchitt" and refers to the battle as "A mass slaughter" Because of this we again doubt the commander's skills and capabilities and the source is telling us that this is also the public perception. Similarly to Source A the source does not give a soldiers opinion and only shows the opinion of the public. And although the actors are meant to be soldiers at the battle of the Somme, we still have no factual evidence of what the actual soldiers thought. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also know from personal knowledge and from studying other sources that the soldiers disagreed with the commander's leadership tactics. From a source written by Lieutenant J.A Raws he states: "I honestly believe that Goldie and many others were murdered through the stupidity of those on authority." This shows the actual viewpoints of the soldiers, some thing which none of the sources do. In order for this source to be more useful it could include the number of deaths i.e. 60 000 on the first day of battle, and some quotes from the soldiers that Earl Haig talked to, this would make the source also become more reliable. For the aforementioned reasons I have come to the conclusion that, although the sources show certain opinions about the commanders, they are not useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers. In order for them to be useful they must contain actual quotes from soldiers i.e. like that of Lieutenant J.A Raws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    the son of Douglas Haig and so is unlikely to say anything negative about his father, this means there is a great element of bias within the source. The source has been taken from 1988 which could well imply the Earl Haig has just suffered years of crticim for his

  2. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    In support to this view from my own knowledge the battle did take pressure off Verdun, where the Germans called off their attack. Nobody at that time knew of a different way of fighting so Haig should not be blamed for using these tactics.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Source C is biased not because it was written by Haig's son (however I'm sure that is part of the reason for his view) but because it does not refer to any hard evidence for the reasons it puts forward, it is an opinion rather than a view.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    was found in London where he made a statement to a local magistrate. This source is useful in telling us information about the mill. He talks about the sleeping arrangement and how they got clean shirts every Sunday. He then goes on to mention that none of the machinery was

  1. How useful are useful sources 1-8 in showing similarities and the differences in the ...

    These jobs paid very high wages and need skill to do the job properly this would have meant that only upper and middle class women would have been given the job. As much dangerous this job was it also was a very important job as much of world war 2

  2. Haig in sources

    So he bombarded the German lines for 5-7 days only to find that the barbed wire was in a worse tangle than before. However if Haig knew about the trenches by visiting them or his generals telling the honest trueth , he might not of sent large amounts of soldiers to their deaths.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    It is also discredited as it is a secondary source, although that does not mean it cannot be reliable. Even though the source may or may not be reliable it is extremely useful, as it contains a lot of information on the subject, which helps you come to your own conclusions.

  2. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    With each of these questions I will consider how the respondents voted on the 1998 referendum and also how they would vote if another referendum were to take place. This will illustrate how people's attitude towards the agreement has changed and developed over the years, since 1998 to 2001.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work