• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B, C in explaining why the U.S.A. involved in Vietnam?Source A is a quote from the U.S. President Johnson to the American public in 1965.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B, C in explaining why the U.S.A. involved in Vietnam? After WW2 Vietnam was separated into the communist north, and the democratic south governed by the corrupt American supported leader Diem. Americas initial aim was to prevent communism spreading, particularly from North Vietnam. A guerrilla army emerged who were sympathetic to the communist beliefs of North Vietnam called the Vietcong and were lead by Ho Chi Minh. In this coursework I intend to assess the usefulness of three sources related to the war in Vietnam. Source A is a quote from the U.S. President Johnson to the American public in 1965. The President is speaking one month after 'operation rolling thunder' and is trying to justify to the public the reasons why America is in Vietnam. One of the most interesting things about this source is that the President does not once directly mention communism or the domino theory although he does make references to communism and the Truman Doctrine, he says 'We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep'. Here he is talking about the Truman Doctrine but he is twisting it to make it sound heroic and dutiful. 'Our objective is the independence of South Vietnam and the freedom of their people'. ...read more.

Middle

He also describes Vietnam as a complete mess asking what is it worth fighting for as it means nothing to him and his country and that he feels there is no way out. America had fallen into its own trap in Vietnam according to this source as the President did not want to fight in Vietnam and he did not think he could pull out without risking his own position. 'Of course if you start running from the communists, they may chase you to your own kitchen' the President believes the domino theory will come into practice which America is meant to be preventing from happening, if he pulls out. He also comments on the war saying 'This is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do.' He believes that it is the wrong thing to do the War in Vietnam but does not see any other option. This source again gives little indication to the reasons that America is in Vietnam it does not give any of the history in Vietnam or of communism though it is less biased than the previous source but does not include enough of the reasons. Source C is the complete opposite of the previous sources it is biased in completely the opposite way to Source A it is taken from an interview with Professor Noam Chomsky who is strictly anti - U.S. ...read more.

Conclusion

The reason America had such influence in South Vietnam was to try and prevent the spread of communism from the North, it was not particularly useful or profitable to the U.S. in its current position. A Guerrilla army called the Vietcong infiltrated South Vietnam from the North. The U.S. used an attack on U.S. ships in the gulf of Tongking as an excuse to launch a full scale assault on North Vietnam. The sources most importantly did not include any information on the U.S. policy of counter- communism which was most relevant to their involvement in Vietnam. Communism was a big issue for the U.S. and the Truman Doctrine stated that they were to aid any country threatened by communism. The sources completely ignored this although Source A hinted at it this was never put across as a definitive reason why America was in Vietnam. Sources A, B, C were not very useful at all in giving reasons why the U.S. was in Vietnam, all were biased to an extent and ignored many of the most vital reasons completely. These sources would not be very useful if they were the only information you had on the Vietnam war as they all lack vital information and reasons to the events in Vietnam. Although this doesn't mean that the sources are not useful as they would be helpful if studying the war from different viewpoints but none are very useful as to why America got involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam war, representation work. In this essay I will evaluate the content, accuracy ...

    They both also use presentational devices to evoke thoughts from their audience and their posters paint an unpleasant picture of the US army's immersion in Vietnam. They are also based on the attitudes of the members of "The Committee to Help Unsell the War" and not on solid facts.

  2. Why was USA involved in Vietnam War?

    Ngo Dinh Diem was a fanatical catholic. As communism hated religion, Diem hated what entire communism stood for. This is why he got America's support - he had a poor record on human rights but his rule was in the era of the US desire to 'contain communism' and anybody who was anticommunist in the Far East

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    The photograph itself was taken by Nic But, a Vietnamese photographer working for the independent Associated Press, making it clear that the source should be most reliable due to its independent and clearly realistic nature. When the photograph was released to the press of the world it provoked a strong response in the American people.

  2. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    US used simple warfare, which could not defeat the guerilla tactics that Viet Cong used. The main of guerilla tactics was to "retreat when enemy attacks, raid when enemy camps, attack when the enemy is tired, pursue when enemy retreats."

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    it was made in Hollywood, it was designed to sell and entertain people. If it had all been fact then it would have been just like a documentary and not many people would have watched it. The film would have also been over exaggerated and biased, the film has limitations

  2. History Controlled Assesment- Success' of USA military

    Representations one and two signify the divide clearly, and symbolise how the USA treated its own people within the United States, never mind those at Vietnam. Patriots supported the war, and wanted the troops to stay in Vietnam. Others however, did not appreciate the USA's presence in Vietnam, and many allied western countries despised the invasion into Cambodia.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    The source says that Haig was 'ultimately victorious' and the Somme was 'the muddy grave of the German army'. This supports Keegan's view that Haig 'did much to lead Britain to victory'. The source also mentions 'Haig's numerous mistakes' and this does not support the view that Haig was 'efficient and highly skilled'.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    The public would have put the government under pressure to withdraw as to try and secure the parties future by not losing possible votes. However on the other hand this source could be biased as it was said by Vietnam veteran Tom Hain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work