• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources a-c to explain why the United Sates became involved in the war in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources a-c to explain why the United Sates became involved in the war in Vietnam? The United States initially had no plans whatsoever to send troops to fight North Vietnam. They hoped to overthrow the Communist Government there by paying to fund and train a strong South Vietnamese army. However, by early March 1965, 3500 US marines and combat troops had landed in Da Nang. So how did America become so heavily involved in Vietnam? This is a question which has provoked debate amongst many historians studying this period in history. The 3 sources provided are useful in many ways, however some can be considered more useful than others. Source A is a speech made by President Johnson to the public a month before the start of Operation Rolling Thunder, that seems to suggest that he was pressured into helping Vietnam fight against communism. This is because every president since 1954 have helped South Vietnam by the use of armed forces. America had never lost a war. The reality that he might be the first president to lose a war persuaded Johnson to send more armed forces and fight the war against communism. America had helped South Korea to become independent of communism from the North. This action showed that America had a tough line on communism, for this reason it was hard for the Americans to ignore the communism attack in Vietnam. ...read more.


The Vietcong were continuously murdering top officials in the south as they intensified their campaign for an independent communist Vietnam. Source C is an extract from an interview with Professor Noam Chomsky who was an American journalist and highly critical of the war. He was also very critical of the US government, which adds to the limitations and the usefulness of the source. The interview was held in October 1982, around 10 years after the war had finished. Unlike the two previous sources, Chomsky is looking at the War in Hindsight, which could possibly distort his view on the USA's involvement after knowing the terrible atrocities that were caused making the source both useful and limited. Noam Chomsky argues that America's involvement in the war is misinterpreted this is evident in an interview in October 1982. It is thought that America fought against the North of Vietnam; however he suggests that America actually attacked the South Vietnam destroying the farming and peasant society. In the source the professor implicates strongly that the United States of America moved into Vietnam because it feared of an independent South Vietnam. Noam Chomsky also suggests that America dreaded the thought of South Vietnam reforming and improving its economy. He firmly believes that this procedure would undermine the American influence in the area. ...read more.


Because Chomsky is looking back in hindsight it makes the source limited and 'its official truth now' meaning that he is sympathising with the US public as they all were now aware of the Vietnam true nature of the war. In conclusion all the sources suggest reason such as the domino effect and the spread of communism. Each source is useful and limited, but out of all the sources, source B is the most useful. Source A is the official reason for why the USA became involved and was taken the election year and therefore would contain limitations in order to please the American public and win the election. Source B on the other hand is from the same election year but is the unofficial reasons. The source is taken from a private conversation and underlines the pressures Johnson had to face, from the president himself. Source C is also limited because it is taken after the war and could be argued that Chomsky was highly influenced by his knowledge. Source B is the most useful to explain why American became involved in the war because it gives the most truthful view from Johnson to why the USA entered Vietnam. Overall, they are all useful but because they have their limitations, it could have been more useful to use another source that was more reliable, such as an independent source that is very balanced and gives us a fair picture. 1391 words ?? ?? ?? ?? Max Nastasi-Grace Page | 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    Vietnam since the 1950's, it could be seen as simply maintaining the sphere of influence, albeit stepping it up to the next level by sending in ground troops. Overall, each of the three sources contributes to the reasoning behind the war but there are differences in them which indicate their usefulness.

  2. Why did the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam?

    The failure of Diem's government meant that the United States had to support South Vietnam more substantially and this propping up escalated until war was unavoidable. Lyndon Baines Johnson who succeeded to the presidency following the assassination of Kennedy was influential in the short term for America's involvement in the

  1. Why did America lose the Vietnam War?

    It goes on to explain the dilemma of the soldiers; "Should you kill all of them, or none of them". I am aware that this was a situation faced almost daily by the Americans in Vietnam. The source continues in a contrasting way, questioning the way America was morally justified.

  2. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    The most famous supply route was the Ho Chi Minh trail, that USA didn't not successfully stopped from working. The route linked China and North Vietnam; this provided supplies for all country and a quick repair of equipment. The reason that led Vietcong to victory was that they had what

  1. American reactions to the vietnam war

    contains sharp accuracy when exploring the events and different people's reaction to the war. In addition it is mostly objective with no intention to manipulate the reader's feelings, even though it only focuses on anti-war reactions. Representation 3 explores in great detail the 'Hard Hat' demonstration in May 1970.

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    They thought it was a Nazi thing slaughtering all those people who were innocent. This would have maybe contributed to television losing the war for America if it got shown as an interview on television. It may not have been shown on television so may not have helped contribute to television losing the war.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    The U.S. government dismissed any thoughts that the 'advisors' would be of any military significance, rather, they were to oversee the $10m worth of U.S. supplies which had been sent there. This was now the first step in the American involvement in Vietnam, and one that had escalated from them supporting the (now called)

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    high in the sky without warning" if one desires to secure popular support among a people. As such, it is clear that Source F attributes American defeat to the crimes they committed against the Vietnamese population as a whole in an effort to defeat the Vietcong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work