• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam? The United States initially had no plans whatsoever to send troops to fight North Vietnam. They hoped to overthrow the Communist Government there by paying to fund and train a strong South Vietnamese army. However, by early March 1965, 3500 US marines and combat troops had landed in Da Nang. So how did America become so heavily involved in Vietnam? This is a question which has provoked debate amongst many historians studying this period in history. I will be studying three sources and analysing how useful they are to explain America's real reasons for going to war with North Vietnam. Source A is a speech made by President Johnson in April 1965. The date is significant, as this was just a month after the start of `Operation Rolling Thunder`. Operation Rolling Thunder involved extensive, systematic bombing on military and industrial targets in North Vietnam. President Johnson is speaking publically, either to Congress or to the American people. As the president, it could be argued that Johnson would have access to all relevant information and would therefore be an excellent source. However I think it is more likely that this was a propaganda speech made to persuade America that a war with North Vietnam was justified. ...read more.

Middle

This led to Congress passing the Tonkin Gulf resolution, giving Johnson complete power to take `any necessary action to prevent further aggression and achieve peace and security` . However as President Johnson is speaking privately I think he is more likely to be revealing his personal opinion about Vietnam. It is clear from what he is saying that he doesn't care about the Vietnamese people, but ultimately he fears that if he allows South Vietnam to fall to communism they "may chase you into your own kitchen". This again implies the American's fear of Domino Effect of Communism. We are left with feeling that Johnson is full of doubt about whether it is right for him to take America to war thousands of miles away. We know this when he says "this is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". Source C is an interview with Noam Chomsky in 1982; nine years after the last American forces had left Vietnam. By the 1980s many people were questioning the importance of the Vietnam War, and began to criticise America's involvement. Many would have been interested in what Chomsky had to say as he had been openly critical of America's involvement during the war. Chomsky, a life-long anarchist, sympathised with communism and had previously written books about the possible benefits of a Communist government. ...read more.

Conclusion

The President talks about the war with almost religious zeal, by quoting from the Bible. He perhaps provides false reasons as to why he has decided to go to war so that America not only accepts a full scale war, but supports one. It could be argued that Source B is a more reliable account of Johnson's real reason for becoming so involved in Vietnam. It at least gives us Johnsons accurate opinion which contradicts Source A, allowing us to discredit Source A further. It reflects the real dilemma Johnson faced and that it was not just a case of fighting for the freedom of the people of South Vietnam. In source C, Noam Chomsky delivers a critical view of America's involvement in Vietnam. He questions the "official" reasons given for the US going to war in Vietnam. However whilst there is evidence to suggest that Chomsky could be accurate in his views, we know that he has always been against US foreign policy. Unlike Source A, Sources B and C are successful in presenting valid reasons why America should not have gone to war or at least their real motives in doing so. Source A on the other hand provides a smoke screen as to the real reasons America became involved in Vietnam. This is useful to a historian as it tells us about propaganda around this period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    also influenced them to think about how the situation would be different If America chose to follow another path. The engine of the train represents America. As you can see the wood is being passed across the train and is being put into the fire.

  2. American reactions to the vietnam war

    reacted to the war, however other areas of the representation lack sufficient detail, for example the author only briefly mentions how the police collaborated with the construction workers. However it does provide broad coverage as it mentions the different reactions to the demonstration, including a major American newspaper.

  1. Why did the United States become involved in Vietnam?

    put forward by president Eisenhower in 1954 stated that the loss of a single country in South East Asia could potentially lead to the loss of all Asia, India, Japan and finally threatening Europe and America. Just as one domino falls it knocks down the next etc until they are

  2. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    This source is especially useful because it was off the record. This means that it is likely a representation of President Johnson's true feeling towards the war. Not only this but it also conflicts heavily with Source A which shows that Johnson's heart may not have truly been in the

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly." They were not prepared to let this happen. South Vietnam looked like the next country to 'fall' to communism. The US therefore supported Diem's regime by sending in money, supplies, armaments and military advisers.

  2. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    If Diem had only made his regime more popular and compassionate, he might have not have been executed and overthrown along with his brother in November 1963, just three weeks before Kennedy was assassinated. Even though US army was well equipped, had large army and a lot of financial support, they used the wrong tactics for a fight in jungle.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    I know that roughly 70% of deaths of US soldiers occurred in the first 6months so this point suggests the source may be reliable on that point. The extract does not mention who Bilton interviewed but if he only interviewed soldiers from My Lai, he would only know problems faced by those soldiers at that time.

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    A common attitude was expressed by students at New York University with a banner hung out of a window which read "They Can't Kill Us All." Just five days after the shootings, 100,000 people demonstrated in Washington, D.C., against the war and the killing of unarmed student protesters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work