• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam? The United States initially had no plans whatsoever to send troops to fight North Vietnam. They hoped to overthrow the Communist Government there by paying to fund and train a strong South Vietnamese army. However, by early March 1965, 3500 US marines and combat troops had landed in Da Nang. So how did America become so heavily involved in Vietnam? This is a question which has provoked debate amongst many historians studying this period in history. I will be studying three sources and analysing how useful they are to explain America's real reasons for going to war with North Vietnam. Source A is a speech made by President Johnson in April 1965. The date is significant, as this was just a month after the start of `Operation Rolling Thunder`. Operation Rolling Thunder involved extensive, systematic bombing on military and industrial targets in North Vietnam. President Johnson is speaking publically, either to Congress or to the American people. As the president, it could be argued that Johnson would have access to all relevant information and would therefore be an excellent source. However I think it is more likely that this was a propaganda speech made to persuade America that a war with North Vietnam was justified. ...read more.

Middle

This led to Congress passing the Tonkin Gulf resolution, giving Johnson complete power to take `any necessary action to prevent further aggression and achieve peace and security` . However as President Johnson is speaking privately I think he is more likely to be revealing his personal opinion about Vietnam. It is clear from what he is saying that he doesn't care about the Vietnamese people, but ultimately he fears that if he allows South Vietnam to fall to communism they "may chase you into your own kitchen". This again implies the American's fear of Domino Effect of Communism. We are left with feeling that Johnson is full of doubt about whether it is right for him to take America to war thousands of miles away. We know this when he says "this is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". Source C is an interview with Noam Chomsky in 1982; nine years after the last American forces had left Vietnam. By the 1980s many people were questioning the importance of the Vietnam War, and began to criticise America's involvement. Many would have been interested in what Chomsky had to say as he had been openly critical of America's involvement during the war. Chomsky, a life-long anarchist, sympathised with communism and had previously written books about the possible benefits of a Communist government. ...read more.

Conclusion

The President talks about the war with almost religious zeal, by quoting from the Bible. He perhaps provides false reasons as to why he has decided to go to war so that America not only accepts a full scale war, but supports one. It could be argued that Source B is a more reliable account of Johnson's real reason for becoming so involved in Vietnam. It at least gives us Johnsons accurate opinion which contradicts Source A, allowing us to discredit Source A further. It reflects the real dilemma Johnson faced and that it was not just a case of fighting for the freedom of the people of South Vietnam. In source C, Noam Chomsky delivers a critical view of America's involvement in Vietnam. He questions the "official" reasons given for the US going to war in Vietnam. However whilst there is evidence to suggest that Chomsky could be accurate in his views, we know that he has always been against US foreign policy. Unlike Source A, Sources B and C are successful in presenting valid reasons why America should not have gone to war or at least their real motives in doing so. Source A on the other hand provides a smoke screen as to the real reasons America became involved in Vietnam. This is useful to a historian as it tells us about propaganda around this period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    The publicity surrounding the My Lai massacre proved to be an important turning point in American public opinion. It showed the deterioration in the behaviour of US troops and undermined the moral argument about the need to save Vietnam from communism.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Source G ties in closely with Source E as a statement of an American solider upon hearing about the My Lai Massacre in 1968. On March 16th 1968, American soldiers murdered some three-hundred and forty seven to five hundred and four unarmed civilians in South Vietnam, falsely claiming that the village had been a stronghold of the Vietcong.

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly." They were not prepared to let this happen. South Vietnam looked like the next country to 'fall' to communism. The US therefore supported Diem's regime by sending in money, supplies, armaments and military advisers.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    the axe and chopping the wood shows that he is firmly being held account for the war. This would give the British people a negative view of President Johnson as it tells them that he is to blame for the war in Vietnam and it is his fault that the devastating events are taking place In Vietnam.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    The source is only presenting one side of the argument as he doesn't mention anything about America having almost limit less money, heavier firepower and the ability to use airstrikes. In the extract it says "The large majority of deaths took place in the first six months".

  2. Why did America lose the Vietnam War?

    Therefore there is insufficient evidence to support the quote. We have seen several different video sources during class. These have ranged from documentaries made recently on the war, to news broadcasts live from Saigon. One of these sources included an interview with an injured soldier as he was about to be carried away.

  1. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    they might have seen more dramatic gruesome scenes possibly causing for opposition than if their media intake was a newspaper or something less graphic. This there gives me an indication of the effect uncensored media had on the course of the war.

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    Following the election of Richard Nixon the TV coverage shifted from combat related stories to the anti-war movement and the political scenario. From 1970 excluding US withdrawal only 14% of stories about the war related to combat. Four Kent State University students were killed and nine were injured and some

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work