• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of 'Operation Rolling Thunder' according to the provenance. This is where he wanted his opinions to be spoken out and heard. In the speech Johnson is saying "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". This is a promise regarded and made by Eisenhower when he was President in 1953. Lyndon Johnson wants all the Americans to believe what he is exactly saying and still wants to keep this promise. The Truman Doctrine was mentioned in the speech which was to come and help about communism in 1948 and Johnson wants to stick with this. In 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started sending "advisers" as first president Kennedy would have wanted. You can see that Johnson is talking in a very religious manner and just maybe a religious when speaking out in the speech. ...read more.

Middle

It's like Lyndon Johnson isn't really bothered and couldn't care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. Johnson is also suggesting that the USA cannot win. It's showing us that Johnson is scared fear of communism taking over the world and that the political consideration "Let's move on, let's go into the North" are just being selfish. We have to be very careful within this speech, as it hasn't been edited o tampered with. If it's all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recording. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said. In source C this is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. It's talking about how the USA went to war for political reasons which were to dominate Vietnam. Also to stop South Vietnam about independence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 'world order' cold was U.S.A think they are democratic and can stop communism. President Johnson when speaking out is saying in other words that we "must" stay in Southeast Asia just like we stayed and did in Europe. In source B this is supposed to be a private and confidential conversation which took place in May 1964 according to the provenance with U.S. President Johnson. Johnson has stated that the U.S. are thick and that they're dumb and not knowledge able to know much about the Vietnam War. "Hell of a lot less". This word/phrase is never spoken out in public. Because it's southern religious Texan and no one ever says the word 'hell' out at all in public. Nearly all the politicians are saying "Let's move, let's go into the North. Most of the politicians' are selfish and un-considerate. Johnson is saying "I don't think we can fight them then thousand miles away from home. I don't think it's worth fighting for." Johnson also spoke out "This is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". That it's the fear of communism taking over. But not just taking over the country, by taking over the world. Johnson forgets that in his office anything that is being said is always being taped, no matter what. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As this can be edited in many various ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    Source C however is from a well known and very biased author and is also over 10 years after the war and is therefore likely to be unreliable in its facts and figures. Because of these reasons I can conclude that, although the sources may be of use individually, together

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    In 1959 the communist government in North Vietnam ordered the Vietminh to begin a terror campaign against Diem's government. President Kennedy had dealings with Diem and supported him. Diem's regime was so corrupt that eventually the US encouraged the South Vietnam army to overthrow him.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    I know that roughly 70% of deaths of US soldiers occurred in the first 6months so this point suggests the source may be reliable on that point. The extract does not mention who Bilton interviewed but if he only interviewed soldiers from My Lai, he would only know problems faced by those soldiers at that time.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    This therefore infers that media could have been import for the deciding of the course of the war hence making the source not as useful at proving that media did not have an influence on the war. Source Q backs the view that media had not influence and says,' Among

  1. Why did the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam?

    European countries and was a strategy of containment against the Soviet Union and the expansion of communism. Consequently the US felt obligated to support South Vietnam in their struggle against the communist North to whom their Cold War enemy: the USSR supplied with; medical supplies, arms, tanks, planes, helicopters, artillery, anti-aircraft missiles and other military equipment.

  2. How useful are sources a-c to explain why the United Sates became involved in ...

    President Johnson clearly gives out his feelings and intentions about the war in Vietnam. This source states several reasons for the USA's involvement in Vietnam making it quite useful. Source B is an extract of President Johnson's ideas and thoughts about the war are expressed in a private conversation in May 1964.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    came great anger within communities who had lost a relative, a friend or somebody else. This could be integrated into the logic behind the personal rationale that fell behind another reason why people demonstrated against the Vietnam War - they wanted to see an end to the 'bloodshed' and 'unnecessary killing' that engulfed the media reports throughout the U.S.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    The President goes on to say that if America did not go to war, the result would be `instability and unrest, and even wider war`. This is a vague reference to the Domino Effect, which was a theory strongly believed by Johnson.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work