• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of 'Operation Rolling Thunder' according to the provenance. This is where he wanted his opinions to be spoken out and heard. In the speech Johnson is saying "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". This is a promise regarded and made by Eisenhower when he was President in 1953. Lyndon Johnson wants all the Americans to believe what he is exactly saying and still wants to keep this promise. The Truman Doctrine was mentioned in the speech which was to come and help about communism in 1948 and Johnson wants to stick with this. In 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started sending "advisers" as first president Kennedy would have wanted. You can see that Johnson is talking in a very religious manner and just maybe a religious when speaking out in the speech. ...read more.

Middle

It's like Lyndon Johnson isn't really bothered and couldn't care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. Johnson is also suggesting that the USA cannot win. It's showing us that Johnson is scared fear of communism taking over the world and that the political consideration "Let's move on, let's go into the North" are just being selfish. We have to be very careful within this speech, as it hasn't been edited o tampered with. If it's all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recording. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said. In source C this is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. It's talking about how the USA went to war for political reasons which were to dominate Vietnam. Also to stop South Vietnam about independence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 'world order' cold was U.S.A think they are democratic and can stop communism. President Johnson when speaking out is saying in other words that we "must" stay in Southeast Asia just like we stayed and did in Europe. In source B this is supposed to be a private and confidential conversation which took place in May 1964 according to the provenance with U.S. President Johnson. Johnson has stated that the U.S. are thick and that they're dumb and not knowledge able to know much about the Vietnam War. "Hell of a lot less". This word/phrase is never spoken out in public. Because it's southern religious Texan and no one ever says the word 'hell' out at all in public. Nearly all the politicians are saying "Let's move, let's go into the North. Most of the politicians' are selfish and un-considerate. Johnson is saying "I don't think we can fight them then thousand miles away from home. I don't think it's worth fighting for." Johnson also spoke out "This is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". That it's the fear of communism taking over. But not just taking over the country, by taking over the world. Johnson forgets that in his office anything that is being said is always being taped, no matter what. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As this can be edited in many various ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Numerous workmen, including Johnson himself, are mournfully dismantling the train in order to provide fuel for the US economy (depicted by the train's engine), which in turn is billowing smoke baring the word "Vietnam". The comic shows that the war effort in Vietnam was consuming massive amounts of resources that

  2. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    No longer could the government edit what news of the war the public saw and heard about like they had in World War I and II. This war was uncut and as horrifying as being there yourself. This was one of the main reasons that the American public lost faith in the war and why, ultimately, America lost the war.

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    The U.S. government dismissed any thoughts that the 'advisors' would be of any military significance, rather, they were to oversee the $10m worth of U.S. supplies which had been sent there. This was now the first step in the American involvement in Vietnam, and one that had escalated from them supporting the (now called)

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Lloyd George wrote source E. He and Haig had both been criticised for how the war was run and he would have replaced Haig with someone else if he had been able to when he became Prime Minister. He had a lot of reasons to make Haig look bad this could make himself look blame free.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    They were also not used to the conditions in the jungle. The constant fear of booby traps in the jungle scared a lot of soldiers, 11% of United States deaths were due to them. In the extract Bilson fails to mention any of these problems.

  2. How useful are sources A, B, C in explaining why the U.S.A. involved in ...

    it is also making a parallel with stopping the progression of communism. The source does not really give us reasons why America is involved in Vietnam it more tries to justify why America is there rather than giving any straight forward reasons.

  1. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    I can infer from this point that the author of the source, Daniel Ford, thought that media did have a big influence on the course of the war as he thought it strongly influenced the publics view. I need to consider if the mass anti war attitude of the public

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    However this backfired badly as the chemical destroyed the natural habitat of various animals and also got into the water supply. The napalm and the Agent Orange would have been seen on television and linked to the loss of the war as the defoliation and burns on people's bodies would have been viewed by millions on the television.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work