• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of 'Operation Rolling Thunder' according to the provenance. This is where he wanted his opinions to be spoken out and heard. In the speech Johnson is saying "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". This is a promise regarded and made by Eisenhower when he was President in 1953. Lyndon Johnson wants all the Americans to believe what he is exactly saying and still wants to keep this promise. The Truman Doctrine was mentioned in the speech which was to come and help about communism in 1948 and Johnson wants to stick with this. In 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started sending "advisers" as first president Kennedy would have wanted. You can see that Johnson is talking in a very religious manner and just maybe a religious when speaking out in the speech. ...read more.

Middle

It's like Lyndon Johnson isn't really bothered and couldn't care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. Johnson is also suggesting that the USA cannot win. It's showing us that Johnson is scared fear of communism taking over the world and that the political consideration "Let's move on, let's go into the North" are just being selfish. We have to be very careful within this speech, as it hasn't been edited o tampered with. If it's all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recording. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said. In source C this is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. It's talking about how the USA went to war for political reasons which were to dominate Vietnam. Also to stop South Vietnam about independence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 'world order' cold was U.S.A think they are democratic and can stop communism. President Johnson when speaking out is saying in other words that we "must" stay in Southeast Asia just like we stayed and did in Europe. In source B this is supposed to be a private and confidential conversation which took place in May 1964 according to the provenance with U.S. President Johnson. Johnson has stated that the U.S. are thick and that they're dumb and not knowledge able to know much about the Vietnam War. "Hell of a lot less". This word/phrase is never spoken out in public. Because it's southern religious Texan and no one ever says the word 'hell' out at all in public. Nearly all the politicians are saying "Let's move, let's go into the North. Most of the politicians' are selfish and un-considerate. Johnson is saying "I don't think we can fight them then thousand miles away from home. I don't think it's worth fighting for." Johnson also spoke out "This is a terrible thing we are getting ready to do". That it's the fear of communism taking over. But not just taking over the country, by taking over the world. Johnson forgets that in his office anything that is being said is always being taped, no matter what. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S. president Johnson really said. As this can be edited in many various ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    a 15 man VC suicide squad and he said "I've never been convinced that those last 25 thousand casualties were justified" When suspected journalist's and voices of the people lost their faith in the war what else could the public do but lose faith as well?

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    We didn't go there to be Nazis. At least none of the people I knew went there to be Nazis." His response reflects the general public response to the crimes at My Lai - the media's coverage of the story provoked an outrage in America.

  1. Why did the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam?

    As a result, starting in 1955 they sent military advisors to assist the South Vietnamese Army and this number augmented and their involvement escalated.

  2. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    Also in 1949, the Elysee Agreement was signed by Bao Dai (the Emperor of Vietnam) and President Vincent Auriol of France where the French pledged to assist in the building of a national anti-Communist army, as opposed to one that was backed by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)

  1. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    This quote states that media did not have an influence on the course of the war. However I find this source quite limited as it is quite hard to understand how it is possible to measure the effect of 'negative media' on anyone and would be very interested to know how they came to this conclusion.

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    But i think it would have contributed to Vietnam losing the war in general if news of this got out. Source H is a cartoon published in the British magazine Punch in 1967. It shows the effects of President Johnson's war policy on the "Great Society"-his vision to "feed and shelter the homeless...to provide more education and medical care.

  1. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    Due to their constant movement, there were no distinguishable major bases to bomb, which meant the supply line to the Viet Cong never stopped. An attempted solution to the jungle bases of the Viet Cong was the use of the chemical Agent Orange, which was used to kill the leaves

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    These officers would share experience with the men, and the GIs had had some combat training before coming to Vietnam, so they were not completely unprepared but there is some truth that, "As a soldier began gaining experience he was sent home" because most soldiers would only do one tour of duty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work