• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of 'Operation Rolling Thunder' helping to stop communism according to the provenance. In the speech Johnson is stating in the source, I quote "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". By this statement indeed Johnson did want his opinions to be heard and notified by his fellow American citizens, so they shall believe every word that comes out of Johnson's mouth. This was due to a promise being made by President Eisenhower when he was elected president in the year of 1953. Lyndon Johnson wishes all the Americans to trust in what he is saying to be 100% truthful and is trying to carry on regarding the promise made by Eisenhower and earn everyone's respect. The 'Truman Doctrine' was also mentioned about. This is a list of every American President who had been elected in year 1948 to agree with a various amount of promises which they written then had to sign. ...read more.

Middle

Johnson implied, I quote "to leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the value of an American commitment and in the value of America's word. The result would be instability and unrest, and even wider war". I could say this source is being very biased, due to because Johnson is only giving his own opinion on what the American citizens want to hear, whilst he is keeping his real thoughts inside and not expressing his personal opinions. The source can be seen quite useful, but has limitations, as I have stated, it's a public speech where Johnson isn't really voicing his truths about what he thinks of Vietnam. To look at Johnson's person views, then I can begin to study source B. Source B is a private primary speech made by President Johnson in May 1964 according to the provenance. At this point in time, Lyndon Baines Johnson was only just elected president. With Johnson being V.P. (Vice President) he knew a lot regarding Vietnam and knew how everything worked. Lyndon Johnson became the thirty-seventh Vice President in the years from and to 1963-1965. Johnson was one of the major leaders of the 'Democratic Party'. Also Lyndon Johnson was the one who were in charge of creating the "Great Society". President Lyndon Baines in this private speech is discussing a number of things which includes criticizing most of his very own American citizens. ...read more.

Conclusion

President Lyndon Baines Johnson really said? As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said, which could make this source a limitation. Source C is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. The interview is talking about political reasons of the U.S.A and how they went to war which was to dominate Vietnam. Also to discontinue South Vietnam from independence and indeed there was an attack on South Vietnam from the U.S.A. Professor Noam Chomsky says, I quote, "The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America. It feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself - develop it's economy- and that might work". Chomsky is being biased due to him being an anti-American, and is therefore being biased towards the American country. To sum up the conclusion of sources A-C all have value and limitations. In my view source B is most useful as it's a private speech where Johnson is criticizing most of his own American citizens by using negative comments and is saying what he really thinks about Vietnam along with the citizens plus America. Once this private speech with Johnson's personal opinions and views about Vietnam, the tape was then exposed to everyone. Therefore source B is definitely the most useful out of them all. By Jordan Alexander Riley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered ...

    No longer could the government edit what news of the war the public saw and heard about like they had in World War I and II. This war was uncut and as horrifying as being there yourself. This was one of the main reasons that the American public lost faith in the war and why, ultimately, America lost the war.

  2. Why did the United States become involved in the war in Vietnam?

    due to their strong anti-communist ideology. Therefore they felt they had to fill the void when France pulled-out of Vietnam in 1955-56 (after the peace accords which had divided Vietnam in half at the 17th parallel) to prevent Ho Chi Minh from unifying Vietnam under communist rule.

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Johnson had hoped to put to use in his vision for the Great Society - instead of helping to improve the lives of Americans, the American economy is vested entirely in continuing the war against North Vietnam. The cartoon also reflects the fact that popular support for the war is

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    I can infer from this point that the author of the source, Daniel Ford, thought that media did have a big influence on the course of the war as he thought it strongly influenced the publics view. I need to consider if the mass anti war attitude of the public

  1. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This cartoon shows a picture of some poor skinny men breaking the planks the train carriages as they have "great society" written on them and feeding them into the fire to feed the train. The train is called US economy.

  2. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    The Vietminh agreed to a cease-fire, but once again, General Vo Nguyen Giap attempted a strategic attack on the French in Hanoi - however, the French weaponry and naval support made it possible that no matter what the opposition may number, it was clear they would suffice as victor.

  1. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    Finally, another factor that the US would have definitely taken into consideration would have been the support of the South Vietnamese peasants. From the start, America realised that the only way a war would have been won would have been through winning the support of the people they are fighting for.

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    scored so low on the intelligence tests that they would never have been let into the normal peacetime army." This quotation says a 'rising number' but it doesn't mean a majority so there will be some that are well educated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work