• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are these sources for explaining why the League was effectively paralysed by the end of the 1930's?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework THOMAS HITCHINGS 11 JME 643 T MR. MITCHELL Question 5 How useful are these sources for explaining why the League was effectively paralysed by the end of the 1930's? If the League was "effectively paralysed by the end of the 1930's," then source D from 1932 is a good example why. At a time when there was political and economical instability across the globe, this was the time when an organisation like the League of Nations should have been standing tall, guiding those nations through their troubled times. Instead, as source D shows, this mass gathering of nations was being walked all over by the Japanese army; the coalition of the world's most powerful nations was acting against everything that their principles and their covenant was all about and allowing a ...read more.

Middle

shows how they had a good idea of the sort of punishment should be placed on the fascist government; this proves that they knew they needed to place sanctions on these administrations. However, (ii) demonstrates how poor they were at actually imposing them, clearly the procedure had not been thought through, failing to impose effective sanctions on the appropriate materials. Source H also highlights the embarrassing lack of support from its own members for its decisions, clearly a sign of a lack of communication. The statement in (ii) says it all: "the incomplete membership of the League made it impossible to make all sanctions effective," the admission from the foreign secretary of the League that shows just how powerless they really were, and how, due to a lack of support the League was crumbling from within and slowly rendering itself feebly ineffective. ...read more.

Conclusion

The League had the potential to be the biggest dog in the yard; but just like a bulldog without any teeth, the League had no muscle or dominance over the other nations, they had all lost their power and with that they had lost their influence and the respect from the other nations who they were meant to be looking over. Together these sources can come together and provide an accurate depiction of the League, they all agree that while the League had all the right principles and all the right intentions, the League could not act upon them, this lost the League its respect and after that it was not long before the League was to become a forgotten power, whose ideas may have lived on, but whose name was forever destroyed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    The Germans had long been furious about having to disarm after the First World War whilst the other nations didn't. Many countries were actually spending more money on arms that before the First World War. After the Manchurian crisis the league realised the urgency of the problem.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    Britain and France weren't willing to supply troops, mainly because of their heavy losses in the First World War. So in the end they resorted back to the economic sanctions which were useless. There was never a time when troops fought on behalf of the League.

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    There is evidence of this from the inscriptions: - 'When a guilty verdict is declared, the prytaneis are to make a decision as to what the offender should pay or suffer'. Despite the fair nature of these trials, it is possible that Athens' influence upon law, as well as the

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

    This meant that decisions, which had to be unanimous, could not be made as quickly as the League would have liked. * The absence of the USA in particular, but also the USSR, severely weakened the league. * It was too closely linked to the treaties of 1919.

  1. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930s?

    Both countries were members of the League, and China, under Article 11- it stated that in the event of war (or threat of war) the League was to 'take any action deemed wise and effectual to safeguard the peace of nations,' appealed.

  2. "Dad's Army" - How much can you learn from these sources about the work ...

    Even though Eden said that the new LDV (Local Defence Volunteers) would be provided with uniforms and weapons, the newly formed Home Guard had to make do with small armbands displaying the LDV initials for military outfits. However, later on, sets of denim arrived.

  1. "Germany came to see itself as a victim without actually being destroyed" How accurate ...

    and moderation on the part of the allies, not entirely born of war-weariness" The next thing to be dealt with was the transfer of territory. The most obvious term was the return of Alsace-Lorraine to France. Schleswig was also returned to Denmark after it had been annexed by Bismark.

  2. What were the consequences of the failure of the league in the 1930s?

    In February 1932 the Japanese had set up a puppet government in Manchuria. The Japanese government didn't want to go any further, but in contrast, the army generals and other high military officials wanted to go even further. It was obvious who was the aggressor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work